Request PNG's (For Docks) Here...

By dreamsINdigital
in Tips, Tweaks & Customization

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

Dominik

Posted
Posted
OK,step by step  :)

whistlerXP - i'm only 14 as well  :blush:

StuntstnutS - i think it's crap anyway :D

nicedreams - thank you,i'll try some games later! and don't worry about sharereactor link,it's not warez site,it's only a list of download links  ;)

JHAres - You have bad eyes,top "bright" is same,68% and 52% aren't more bold (it looks like it is because text isnt so wide) and spaces on the left and right are right! Check default Alcohol icons- 120% is written over whole rectangle,but 68 and 52 arent.120% - 4 characters, 52% and 68% have only 3 characters.Don't blame me i know what i do  :angry:

:D

woah, dominik, I said i LIKED IT, no need to beatch about it....btw, can you add a tutorial section to your website, whenever its gonna be done?

I know only one tutorial - PRACTICE with anything.That's all you need. :p

I don't think i'll make any tutorial,sorry.Oh yes and i don't know when it will be finished,i'm lazy you know :rolleyes:

Grand Master

Dominik

Posted
Posted
oh and btw, there seems to be some serious talent around, 13-14-15 year olds doing what will take me years to learn

I've learned photoshop very fast.It's not about program skills,it's about artist feeling :yes: I've gone to art school since i was 6 years old :yes:

Mentor

JHAres

Posted
Posted
JHAres - You have bad eyes,top "bright" is same,68% and 52% aren't more bold (it looks like it is because text isnt so wide) and spaces on the left and right are right! Check default Alcohol icons- 120% is written over whole rectangle,but 68 and 52 arent.120% - 4 characters, 52% and 68% have only 3 characters.Don't blame me i know what i do  :angry:

:D

I'm not blaming mate... just helping to get the icons equal... :p

Ok... let see the three icons together... :p

Opinions...???? :rolleyes:

Edit: Look what I say...??? The bright in 52 and 68 has a sharp border, and 68 looks bolder that 52 and 120... ;)

post-42-1040590254.png

Rising Star

StuntstnutS

Posted
Posted

Ive gone to waldorf ( art-music ) school since I was 3, and Ive been using photoshop for about 6 months, you need mastery of the tools before you can create on paper ( photoshop ) what your imagination can dream.

/edit... the red alcohol png seems a bit darker, it is the same as the others, but the red makes the right side of the rectangle too dark, might need to lighted it up just a little bit. :)

Mentor

JHAres

Posted
Posted
check green alcohol icon again,i've reposted it 1 hour ago :D

top bright is same,it just looks different on red backround

and you're right,i've forgotten to check BOLD on red alcohol icon :blush:

Right... 68% (green) is ok now... :p

But that sharp bright limit in 52% and 68% not appearing in 120% is just by the color...??? :blink:

Grand Master

jago6498

Posted
Posted

Hey Dominik, you had made me a IGN icon in the Icon request thread, but it's highest resolution was 72x72. I needed it to be a 128x128 IGN logo, either a .PNG or .ICO is fine. I can just convert the icon to a 128x128 PNG...

DAng, if you say that your 14 & your not a kid...then I must be ancient then b/c I'm 22...

Grand Master

Dominik

Posted
Posted
Hey Dominik, you had made me a IGN icon in the Icon request thread, but it's highest resolution was 72x72. I needed it to be a 128x128 IGN logo, either a .PNG or .ICO is fine. I can just convert the icon to a 128x128 PNG...

DAng, if you say that your 14 & your not a kid...then I must be ancient then b/c I'm 22...

jago - I've made two ign.com icons and they're only 72x72 because main logo on the site is very small.If I'd enlarge it to 128x128,it would be blurry and I don't like that.Anyway I think you haven't set your dock to show the PNG in 128x128 on hover,so you don't need so big PNG.You can convert 72x72 ICO to PNG anyway and Dock will automatically resize it to bigger size when your cursor is on it.

You're not ancient,you're just grandfather ;)

Mentor

JHAres

Posted
Posted
I go to normal school, well as normal as you can get in England.

My son in the the secondary level... technical school... at I.T.P.A. = Instituto Tecnologico Philips Argentina in spanish or in english must be P.A.I.T. = Philips Argentina Technological Institute... and yes, is a college depending from Philips Electronics.... ;)

Grand Master

jago6498

Posted
Posted
Hey Dominik, you had made me a IGN icon in the Icon request thread, but it's highest resolution was 72x72. I needed it to be a 128x128 IGN logo, either a .PNG or .ICO is fine. I can just convert the icon to a 128x128 PNG...

DAng, if you say that your 14 & your not a kid...then I must be ancient then b/c I'm 22...

jago - I've made two ign.com icons and they're only 72x72 because main logo on the site is very small.If I'd enlarge it to 128x128,it would be blurry and I don't like that.Anyway I think you haven't set your dock to show the PNG in 128x128 on hover,so you don't need so big PNG.You can convert 72x72 ICO to PNG anyway and Dock will automatically resize it to bigger size when your cursor is on it.

You're not ancient,you're just grandfather ;)

Ah ok, oh well...no biggie...if I can find you a larger image would that make it eaiser to make a 128x128 PNG?

Enthusiast

MaxPower2k

Posted
Posted
Hey Dominik, you had made me a IGN icon in the Icon request thread, but it's highest resolution was 72x72. I needed it to be a 128x128 IGN logo, either a .PNG or .ICO is fine. I can just convert the icon to a 128x128 PNG...

DAng, if you say that your 14 & your not a kid...then I must be ancient then b/c I'm 22...

jago - I've made two ign.com icons and they're only 72x72 because main logo on the site is very small.If I'd enlarge it to 128x128,it would be blurry and I don't like that.Anyway I think you haven't set your dock to show the PNG in 128x128 on hover,so you don't need so big PNG.You can convert 72x72 ICO to PNG anyway and Dock will automatically resize it to bigger size when your cursor is on it.

You're not ancient,you're just grandfather ;)

here's a 128x128 IGN png:

post-42-1040591686.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft will finally let you sign in to Edge with a Google account

      By Leopeva64 · Posted

      In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • The official Funny Pictures thread

      By +Edouard · Posted

    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By Jaybonaut · Posted

      You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Creative Sound Blaster AE-X PCIe review: your headphones will love it

      By cleverclogs · Posted

      Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?

  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!