Music App. For Mac OS X


Recommended Posts

This may sound like a project that will never come true. However, with a little bit of time, teamwork, and effort the folks on Neowin can really make a good music app. for Mac OS X.

How?

There are a lot of music apps. for Mac. However, there are many apps. that are missing features that are true necessities. For example, iTunes is great, but it's bloated full of stuff that are rarely used by many users. Another example, would be those commercial products, we can't afford.

If you combine features from every popular Mac music app. and pack it all into one simple user interface such as foobar, it can really make a difference when using a Mac. Especially, when it's made for open source use.

A great example is VLC, it's simple, compact, and plays all videos without any hassle to download codecs from websites. It would be great to have a simple application just like VLC, but it's focus is playing music on a Mac.

So, anyone willing to unite and work on it?

It would be great. :)

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/531170-music-app-for-mac-os-x/
Share on other sites

You can actually play mp3s and other music in VLC. It's pretty handy.

yea, you can, but he is asking for something LIKE vlc which FOCUSSES on music, just like foobar but especially for mac.

i think its a nice idea, although im an itunes user for years and i love it. :) but if thered be a real handy, little, good looking, not-so-hungry app that seems appearing to me... why not giving it a try.

hopefully some coders here have enough time and fun to do something like this. :)

Just because iTunes offers many features doesn't mean it's bloated. The interface is very clean and you can disable services such as Radio, Podcasts, iTunes Store, etc. if you don't need them.

But I agree, beyond iTunes Mac OS X lacks good music players.

But I agree, beyond iTunes Mac OS X lacks good music players.

That tends to be the case for most Mac software. One or two great apps to do a specific task instead of 50-100 mediocre ones like you tend to have on Windows or Linux. Quality vs. quantity.

looks like it hasnt been updated in ages

The application has been discontinued because Adion couldn't compete with iTunes.

That tends to be the case for most Mac software. One or two great apps to do a specific task instead of 50-100 mediocre ones like you tend to have on Windows or Linux. Quality vs. quantity.

Yep. It never bothered me. Like you said (at least what I assume you meant) the average quality of Mac OS applications is much better than what you come across on Windows and Linux.

Roxio Toast Titanium is living proof. ;)

*Dreams of a Cocoa WinAmp-ish app for Mac OS X*

Though I love iTunes, and it's always been everything I needed. I'd still love to at least try a fully native WinAmp-like app for Mac OS X. XMMS, unfortunately, needs X11 to run. Not very practical, in my opinion.

Since switching in late November, I have been seriously missing Winamp. Running it in Parallel's Coherence mode just doesn't compare to running it natively. Right before the switch, I made a few mockups of an OS X-styled skin for Winamp that might make a pretty decent native app. If there is enough interest in something like this, I'm sure we could get a small team (3-4 people?) together to work on it.

Any takers?

one replacement for itunes in the future may be http://www.songbirdnest.com/

although they already look very "similar"....

Doubt it. It uses the same horrible technique as Firefox to render it's interface and it's slow as hell as a result. It won't ever come even close to iTunes if it doesn't become a truly native Mac OS X application.

I for one never really liked WinAmp, always used Windows Media Player and after that iTunes (first on Windows XP, later on Mac OS X).

Doubt it. It uses the same horrible technique as Firefox to render it's interface and it's slow as hell as a result. It won't ever come even close to iTunes if it doesn't become a truly native Mac OS X application.

I for one never really liked WinAmp, always used Windows Media Player and after that iTunes (first on Windows XP, later on Mac OS X).

Songbird would be awesome if it wasnt for that skinning engine

Just found out that MPlayer for Mac OS X isn't dead. I was keeping track of the wrong site.

http://www.mplayerhq.hu/design7/dload.html

Not entirely related to this thread, but it's a pretty nice replacement for VLC. I find VLC a bit too unstable lately. :/

picture1ge1.png

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!