Recommended Posts

Alright.. I don't know what I'm doing wrong.. but I cannot get other XP box's to read simple shares on vista

As in there is no prompts whatsoever XP reports nothing there..

I have done a basic telnet test and only found port 139 open

This is my 2nd or 3rd install of Vista and this problem has re-occurred with this same computer.. the firewall is off.. I can use Terminal Services via the internet (meaning it's possible to connect to it)

I have a Nvidia and a Marvel Yukon onboard Ethernets tried them both no change.. I tried turning on guest accounts.. (the old XP trick) in the list my shared devices I have upwards of like 8 or 9 now.. of course none of them show up via outside..

I have tried multiple XP box's and again it doesn't list.. I have tried pulling up by direct name and by direct IP nothing.. (I use a static internal IP currently the ethernet is the Marvel) Lastly, I can pull up external XP shares with the vista on the box and or boot into my old xp and network fine..

My basic understanding is I do not know the settings to turn it on.. or bring up a login/dialog box (haven't seen one ever) I prefer my shares open (with guest account) usually cause I don't worry about stuff like that on my own network..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/531629-networking-hell/
Share on other sites

to enable guest account login for network shares on a vista machine (no user/pass):

control panel - network and sharing center... set password protected sharing to off

to make vista machines play nice in a workgroup with XP or Samba machines, use regedit:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\netbt\Parameters\UseNewSmb = 0

and also type secpol.msc into the start menu and hit enter, browse to:

Local policies - Security options - Network security: LAN manager authentication level

then set it to LM & NTLM - use NTLMv2 session secuirty if negotiated

Assuming all machines are on the same subnet, XP boxes should now be able to access the vista machine's shares. If it still doesn't connect, temporarily disable windows firewall and try again.

It's not only port 139 that needs to be reachable, port 445 for tcp (maybe udp also) must also be open on the vista machine's firewall. :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Funny enough, the aesthetic is pretty much the only thing I like from Windows 11 so I don't mind a distro that looks like it but the perks of it being Linux underneath. I'm usually a 'start with the base and build it myself' type Linux person but if a distro is close enough to what I'd likely set it to myself, no reason not to start with a good chunk of the work done for me.
    • Ignoring for the moment the bizarre claim that the new Outlook app is more "agile"... "Microsoft also mentions offline and PST (Outlook data/personal storage table) additions that are continuing to improve. The company is right in this regard as it recently confirmed another new offline feature for New Outlook. And PST file support is also here." This was the dealbreaker for me. If true, and if it works sanely, then "New" Outlook becomes viable. Still, gonna wait for the other shoe to drop...
    • Because Win7 was beautiful, much faster and more functional than XP. Win10 (glossing over 8 as many do) was slightly faster in some cases, more functional in some cases, but some people such as myself hated how it looked and decided it wasn't worth the upgrade. Some people liked (or were ok with) the look, and thus it is a good upgrade. Win11 is like 10, but is less functional between key features being removed and constant bugs/crashes either due to updates, or just things that were never patched. It literally has nothing going for it, and I use it every day at work so I'm quite familiar with it.
    • I switched my mom from Chrome to Firefox and she had a serious meltdown. She even managed to figure out how to reinstall Chrome, which really surprised me. What finally got her to switch was Chrome no longer being supported on Win7 and me putting a Chrome skin on FF, and setting it up identically.
    • Feels very much like most other gnome based Linux distros. There is minimal amounts that are influenced by Windows 11, maybe just enough to make people who are switching comfortable enough with the idea. As far as I can tell its mainly just turning the 'taskbar' panel as a 100% sized static panel, rather than the default dynamic sized. Turning it from the Mac OS Dock into the Windows taskbar. The Arc Menu - that I assume you're taking not with from the screenshots, is indeed the Windows 11 style one, but it has lots of other options too, from the more traditional gnome, Windows 7 etc. Still free to install what ever Window Manager you want once you're comfortable enough with Linux though.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Bert Fershner earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Year In
      Steviant earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      552
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      208
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      175
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      151
    5. 5
      Som
      138
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!