Windows Vista Upgrade Editions - The Full Story


Recommended Posts

For a while now people have been speculating vover what exactly happens if you buy an upgrade edition of Vista.

Well I've got Vista Business Upgrade and this is the story

The DVD IS fully bootable infact its a normal vista DVD - all editions are there and the key determines the edition you get, and you can not enter a key - normal Vista DVD.

However, When you attempt to boot from the dvd and try the key provided it informs you that the key can only be used to upgrade from within Windows. Damn

Don't bother trying to install without a key and then entering the upgrade key when you have vista up and running either, the Licensing service gives an error which informs you that the key cannot be used for clean installs.

Damn

So with an upgrade edition you HAVE to start the install from the previous edition of windows.

The only way i can see to get a clean install, is to have 2 hard disks (Or partitions), stick XP on the second, start the Vista setup, and install it to the 1st hard disk, then you have a clean vista install. When its in and happy format the XP disk and there you go. (this is what i'm doing ATM)

We'll see how it goes!

so you cant say stick in an xp cd during setup to prove you had xp, you have to install over it! :no:

No, you can't insert a previous Windows version disc. You have to have an existing Windows installed. However, when you run setup from within Windows you can choose the option to clean install. Another installation just has to be present on the hard drive which will get renamed after installation so you can delete.

It's not that bad, just means that you have to install two OSes really. Since I have Vista Upgrade licenses, what I'll end up doing is making a version of XP that's had every single component removed with nLite. That way it'll install fast :)

I use to be a big fan of buying the "upgrades" and performing a clean install with them, but I thought Microsoft did away with that. Of course, several neowinians disagreed, but I knew Microsoft had taken some preventative measures with the "upgrades".

great clarification, but sucks...

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

Again this is Microsoft assuming that everyone is a pirate/thief. I'm all for Microsoft ensuring that you have a genuine copy of Windows before allowing a Vista upgrade to be used but it should be possible to do that without installing the original version first. This just means you now have to install XP, activate it and then do a clean install of Vista, completely negating the improvements they've made to install speed. It's a big slap in the face to anybody that buys it rather than pirating it. Microsoft really needs to sort its act out as this situation is unacceptable to genuine paying customers.

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

5 years from now it'll be a wonder if MS will still allow new XP installs to be activated, let alone be verified as genuine. XP won't be like an OS such as Windows 95 where it'll still install and run happily on an old PC 11 years after its release.

(This is assuming you don't use certain OEM installs that come pre-activated, like the case with my older VAIO.)

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

Why is it a major issue to install from the current OS? What is SO bad about it?

I don't think that is the issue, perhaps I'm wrong but here is my take on it: the upgrade editions of Vista required a previous Windows OS installed and activated and while right now there is no real issue. But there will come a time when you will not be able to activate your copy of Windows XP, as it will no longer be supported, what happens then? If you had no choice but to reformat your computer, how do you reinstall Vista? the simple answer is you cannot and will be required to purchase a full install of Vista, there is where the issue lies I think?

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

100% sure I just installed XP and then did my vista install without activating XP.

Why isn't MS making/showing an additional box when doing a clean install.

Like... do you own a previous copy of Windows XP? Yes, oh well... here you can key in your license number.

And another box in which you can type in your Vista key.

So, you do have a "clean" install of Vista without the remains of Windows XP (and activitating it, since all the valid keys are stored onto MS's servers).

Problem solved :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!