Windows Vista Upgrade Editions - The Full Story


Recommended Posts

For a while now people have been speculating vover what exactly happens if you buy an upgrade edition of Vista.

Well I've got Vista Business Upgrade and this is the story

The DVD IS fully bootable infact its a normal vista DVD - all editions are there and the key determines the edition you get, and you can not enter a key - normal Vista DVD.

However, When you attempt to boot from the dvd and try the key provided it informs you that the key can only be used to upgrade from within Windows. Damn

Don't bother trying to install without a key and then entering the upgrade key when you have vista up and running either, the Licensing service gives an error which informs you that the key cannot be used for clean installs.

Damn

So with an upgrade edition you HAVE to start the install from the previous edition of windows.

The only way i can see to get a clean install, is to have 2 hard disks (Or partitions), stick XP on the second, start the Vista setup, and install it to the 1st hard disk, then you have a clean vista install. When its in and happy format the XP disk and there you go. (this is what i'm doing ATM)

We'll see how it goes!

so you cant say stick in an xp cd during setup to prove you had xp, you have to install over it! :no:

No, you can't insert a previous Windows version disc. You have to have an existing Windows installed. However, when you run setup from within Windows you can choose the option to clean install. Another installation just has to be present on the hard drive which will get renamed after installation so you can delete.

It's not that bad, just means that you have to install two OSes really. Since I have Vista Upgrade licenses, what I'll end up doing is making a version of XP that's had every single component removed with nLite. That way it'll install fast :)

I use to be a big fan of buying the "upgrades" and performing a clean install with them, but I thought Microsoft did away with that. Of course, several neowinians disagreed, but I knew Microsoft had taken some preventative measures with the "upgrades".

great clarification, but sucks...

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

Again this is Microsoft assuming that everyone is a pirate/thief. I'm all for Microsoft ensuring that you have a genuine copy of Windows before allowing a Vista upgrade to be used but it should be possible to do that without installing the original version first. This just means you now have to install XP, activate it and then do a clean install of Vista, completely negating the improvements they've made to install speed. It's a big slap in the face to anybody that buys it rather than pirating it. Microsoft really needs to sort its act out as this situation is unacceptable to genuine paying customers.

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

5 years from now it'll be a wonder if MS will still allow new XP installs to be activated, let alone be verified as genuine. XP won't be like an OS such as Windows 95 where it'll still install and run happily on an old PC 11 years after its release.

(This is assuming you don't use certain OEM installs that come pre-activated, like the case with my older VAIO.)

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

Why is it a major issue to install from the current OS? What is SO bad about it?

I don't think that is the issue, perhaps I'm wrong but here is my take on it: the upgrade editions of Vista required a previous Windows OS installed and activated and while right now there is no real issue. But there will come a time when you will not be able to activate your copy of Windows XP, as it will no longer be supported, what happens then? If you had no choice but to reformat your computer, how do you reinstall Vista? the simple answer is you cannot and will be required to purchase a full install of Vista, there is where the issue lies I think?

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

100% sure I just installed XP and then did my vista install without activating XP.

Why isn't MS making/showing an additional box when doing a clean install.

Like... do you own a previous copy of Windows XP? Yes, oh well... here you can key in your license number.

And another box in which you can type in your Vista key.

So, you do have a "clean" install of Vista without the remains of Windows XP (and activitating it, since all the valid keys are stored onto MS's servers).

Problem solved :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!