Windows Vista Upgrade Editions - The Full Story


Recommended Posts

For a while now people have been speculating vover what exactly happens if you buy an upgrade edition of Vista.

Well I've got Vista Business Upgrade and this is the story

The DVD IS fully bootable infact its a normal vista DVD - all editions are there and the key determines the edition you get, and you can not enter a key - normal Vista DVD.

However, When you attempt to boot from the dvd and try the key provided it informs you that the key can only be used to upgrade from within Windows. Damn

Don't bother trying to install without a key and then entering the upgrade key when you have vista up and running either, the Licensing service gives an error which informs you that the key cannot be used for clean installs.

Damn

So with an upgrade edition you HAVE to start the install from the previous edition of windows.

The only way i can see to get a clean install, is to have 2 hard disks (Or partitions), stick XP on the second, start the Vista setup, and install it to the 1st hard disk, then you have a clean vista install. When its in and happy format the XP disk and there you go. (this is what i'm doing ATM)

We'll see how it goes!

so you cant say stick in an xp cd during setup to prove you had xp, you have to install over it! :no:

No, you can't insert a previous Windows version disc. You have to have an existing Windows installed. However, when you run setup from within Windows you can choose the option to clean install. Another installation just has to be present on the hard drive which will get renamed after installation so you can delete.

It's not that bad, just means that you have to install two OSes really. Since I have Vista Upgrade licenses, what I'll end up doing is making a version of XP that's had every single component removed with nLite. That way it'll install fast :)

I use to be a big fan of buying the "upgrades" and performing a clean install with them, but I thought Microsoft did away with that. Of course, several neowinians disagreed, but I knew Microsoft had taken some preventative measures with the "upgrades".

great clarification, but sucks...

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

Again this is Microsoft assuming that everyone is a pirate/thief. I'm all for Microsoft ensuring that you have a genuine copy of Windows before allowing a Vista upgrade to be used but it should be possible to do that without installing the original version first. This just means you now have to install XP, activate it and then do a clean install of Vista, completely negating the improvements they've made to install speed. It's a big slap in the face to anybody that buys it rather than pirating it. Microsoft really needs to sort its act out as this situation is unacceptable to genuine paying customers.

This has already been said, but I'll add it to this thread.

Your XP has to be both activated and Genuine or Vista Update won't load.

If 3 years down the road you format your Hard Drive or your Hard Drive crashes, you better hope you still have your XP CD and key still or have your whole HDD backed up. You will have to first load XP, then reactivate it and have it show as Genuine. Then reload Vista.

If you loose your XP CD and or key, then you will not be able to use your Vista Upgrade.

Spend the extra money and get the Full Install if you can.

5 years from now it'll be a wonder if MS will still allow new XP installs to be activated, let alone be verified as genuine. XP won't be like an OS such as Windows 95 where it'll still install and run happily on an old PC 11 years after its release.

(This is assuming you don't use certain OEM installs that come pre-activated, like the case with my older VAIO.)

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

Why is it a major issue to install from the current OS? What is SO bad about it?

I don't think that is the issue, perhaps I'm wrong but here is my take on it: the upgrade editions of Vista required a previous Windows OS installed and activated and while right now there is no real issue. But there will come a time when you will not be able to activate your copy of Windows XP, as it will no longer be supported, what happens then? If you had no choice but to reformat your computer, how do you reinstall Vista? the simple answer is you cannot and will be required to purchase a full install of Vista, there is where the issue lies I think?

I know its not new news, just confirming how it worked!!

By the way windows XP does NOT have to be activated to do the upgrade. I installed XP, didn't activate it (didn't even install the LAN card drivers) and then did a clean install on the same partition, no problems at all. Would still prefer to boot from the vista disk, but oh well.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

You sure? MS said it has to be activated for it to be upgraded to Vista. If your correct and you don't need to, that will certainly take the pain out of reinstalling an upgrade edition of Vista.

100% sure I just installed XP and then did my vista install without activating XP.

Why isn't MS making/showing an additional box when doing a clean install.

Like... do you own a previous copy of Windows XP? Yes, oh well... here you can key in your license number.

And another box in which you can type in your Vista key.

So, you do have a "clean" install of Vista without the remains of Windows XP (and activitating it, since all the valid keys are stored onto MS's servers).

Problem solved :yes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Linux 7.2's first release candidate gets off to a good start by Paul Hill Credit: Larry Ewing It has been a few weeks since the release of Linux 7.1, and in that time, the Linux 7.2 merge window has been open, where developers can submit their features and patches ready for the upcoming release. That window is now shut, and the release candidate phase has begun so that new features can be tested and further fixes applied. According to the founder of Linux, Linus Torvalds, this week’s release candidate looks “reasonably normal”. Although we are super early in the release candidates, this is a good sign as it makes it more likely that an eighth release candidate will not be needed. Torvalds even mentioned that the update’s stats are only larger than they really are because there was another AMD header drop with a third of the patch just being AMD GPU register definitions, which aren’t big changes but make the code contributed look larger overall. In addition to this, he noted that just over half the patch is drivers, even when excluding the AMD register dump. The rest of the changes are spread out over architecture updates, tooling, documentation, and core kernel updates. In the next week, Torvalds says that he will be chilling out, taking the week “mostly off”. Despite this, he will be reading emails and keeping up with things, so if he is slow responding, now you know why. He said he is hoping for a calm week, but we will just have to see if the second release candidate is actually like that. We should expect seven or eight release candidates before Linux 7.2 is released, so expect it around the end of August. If you missed it a few weeks ago, be sure to check out our coverage of Linux 7.1's release.
    • Ridiculous claim that the labor cost difference of $6000 annually would increase cost per phone by $200. The employees produce 3 phones per month or what?
    • Sparkle 2.20.1 by Razvan Serea Sparkle is a free, open-source Windows optimization tool designed to make your PC faster, cleaner, and more private. With Sparkle, you can easily debloat Windows by removing unnecessary apps and services, disable Microsoft tracking to enhance privacy, and apply performance tweaks to boost speed. Its cleaner removes junk and temporary files, while every change is safe and fully reversible. Sparkle also features a modern, user-friendly interface with automatic updates, making system maintenance simple. Explore over 39 tweaks, from disabling telemetry and hibernation to optimizing network and game settings, all aimed at customizing and enhancing your Windows experience. Sparkle supports Windows 10 and 11. Sparkle 2.20.1 changelog: You can now change the Animation Direction from Up, Left, or Off. Added configurable animation direction (Up, Left, Off) for improved accessibility Added TTL caching to the system info backend Refactored tweak application flow to await NvidiaProfileInspector Improved IPC listener cleanup to correctly remove specific listeners Fixed online status not updating after successful network requests Updated system info tests to support backend caching Removed electron-toolkit utils dependency in favor of internal is.dev helper Fixed unwanted files and folders being included in application bundles Download: Sparkle 2.20.1 | Portable | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Sparkle Website | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Never used the G7 Pro, but I've never had a good experience with that style of d-pad and fighting games.
    • And I just bought a seat cushion for my mesh chair. The chair feels nice but the first time I sat in it with boxers, I realized I don't like the feel of mesh on my legs. 😂
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      JKR earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      250
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      86
    5. 5
      macoman
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!