Windows Vista Upgrade Editions - The Full Story


Recommended Posts

I wish I had an upgrade key!!

An upgrade is not always recommended... because some of your apps might not work after upgrading, and the users folders are differente in windows vista, and that would mean migrating from the old structure to the new one (although I think Vista has symbolic links from the old documents and settings to the new Users, for "legacy support"). There's always a chance you screw things up.

Antivirus in XP have different kernel privileges than in vista , right? Which would mean you can screw the antivirus up easily too!

And overall, a lot of useless files are kept when upgrading.

That's the main reason most of us don't like an upgrade.

Then, what happens when you format your computer for whatever reason? There HAS to be a clean install option (what happens when you run the installer from within VISTA?).

And lastly, Upgrade versions have always been the same as the retail ones, with a reduced price. You could only use an upgrade version if you could prove that you had purchased a previous version of windows before. This is, upgrade versions have THE SAME features, but you can only use that license if you meet that requirement.

A clean install is a feature to me, I don't think that has to change now in upgrade versions. If there's no way you can perform a clean install from an upgrade disc, it has to be written somewhere in the box, or the EULA, or whatever: "This upgrade version IS the same as the retail one, BUT you can not perform a clean install". I wouldn't buy it if I knew that beforehand.

I think that if everyone looks around on these forums they will find that this thread isn't really "news"

I announced how the upgrade discs would work months ago and everyone jumped on my ass saying I was wrong.

Now it looks like I was 100% exactly, dead on as for how it would work.

I agree 100% Morpheus Phreak - I read several weeks ago the entire thread where you explained how Vista would work and it's the best I've read anywhere as to how Vista will work on Full/Upgrades, etc. . I made a file from your posts, editing to just the questions and your answers.

I think it would be a great benefit to put a sticky on this site that can be referenced by all. The questions answered by you have been asked a billion time already and people are still give incorrect answers.

Great job Morpheus Phreak :yes: :yes:

I don't think that is the issue, perhaps I'm wrong but here is my take on it: the upgrade editions of Vista required a previous Windows OS installed and activated and while right now there is no real issue. But there will come a time when you will not be able to activate your copy of Windows XP, as it will no longer be supported, what happens then?

Create an image of an activated XP installation and you won't have that problem should it ever arise.

Hmmm, wonder what happens if I do a clean install of Vista Ultimate without providing a key and then later go in and give it a upgrade key...
Don't bother trying to install without a key and then entering the upgrade key when you have vista up and running either, the Licensing service gives an error which informs you that the key cannot be used for clean installs.

Damn

... which sucks. They could've at least allowed the licensing service to scan an older Windows XP license for upgrade eligibility.

I did preorder the Vista ultimate upgrade about a week ago. While I don't mind installing from XP (I'll just keep an image as others have suggested), I'm wondering if since that computer is not running vista, could I install the XP on another computer?? Or is that computer basically hogging a license for both XP and Vista at the same time??

Is there anywhere a person can find the EULA for OEM, upgrade, and retail?? I'm sorta curious to the wording MS uses for each of these.

I'm wondering if since that computer is not running vista, could I install the XP on another computer?? Or is that computer basically hogging a license for both XP and Vista at the same time??

An upgrade is exactly that... an addition to the original product. If you could use any old version of XP to install Vista and keep on using XP there wouldn't be any point in the upgrade edition being sold.

What I want to know is: say you have XP Pro. Can you buy the upgrade edition of Vista Home Premium and be eligible to use it? I mean, I don't think it would let you do an in-place upgrade over your current install judging by the upgrade matrix that I saw, but would it give you the option of a clean install if you start it from inside XP?

Or would you be required to by Vista Business or Ultimate if you wanted to use an Upgrade edition?

yes but you would have to do a clean install AKA windows.old. Anyone know what will happen to the program files directory? I was planning on getting windows vista ultimate upgrade but now i'm thinking of getting home premium full just to be able to do a clean install.

Question: If I did buy the home premium FULL and use the anytime upgrade to ultimate and I have to reinstall windows, would I be able to choose ultimate instead of home premium for the upgrade

This may have been mentioned, but there are so many threads concerning this that it is hard to keep up with what's already been stated. If you do purchase an upgrade edition, and you start the upgrade from within Windows as required, do you have the option to format the hard drive during setup so you can have a really clean install?

um has anyone noticed this:

APPLIES TO

? Windows Vista Home Premium

? Windows Vista Home Basic

? Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit edition

? Windows Vista Home Basic 64-bit edition

? Windows Vista Starter

Windows Vista Ultimate and Business don't appear any word if those versions can do a clean install/upgrade?

I agree 100% Morpheus Phreak - I read several weeks ago the entire thread where you explained how Vista would work and it's the best I've read anywhere as to how Vista will work on Full/Upgrades, etc. . I made a file from your posts, editing to just the questions and your answers.

I think it would be a great benefit to put a sticky on this site that can be referenced by all. The questions answered by you have been asked a billion time already and people are still give incorrect answers.

Great job Morpheus Phreak :yes: :yes:

Thanks peach :)

I'm always glad to be of use somewhere :)

Also for Xerxes, XP will be supported for quite a few years to come. By that time the next version of Windows will already be out so people won't really have to worry about it being supported for reinstalls.

yes but you would have to do a clean install AKA windows.old. Anyone know what will happen to the program files directory? I was planning on getting windows vista ultimate upgrade but now i'm thinking of getting home premium full just to be able to do a clean install.

Question: If I did buy the home premium FULL and use the anytime upgrade to ultimate and I have to reinstall windows, would I be able to choose ultimate instead of home premium for the upgrade

Yes, you are issues a new key when you do the AU and your old license is invalidated.

So that means from there on out when you reinstall you use the new key and choose Ultimate.

Neojoker check for my posts on this subject. I've outlined it exactly as to how it works quite some time ago.

Basically you can perform a clean install but it can be a pain.

1 method involves just doing an in place clean install and it renames all of the old windows files so you have to delete them afterwards.

The other method is installing XP on a 2nd partition/drive and then telling Vista to install to the first partition and then just formatting the 2nd partition/drive

1 method involves just doing an in place clean install and it renames all of the old windows files so you have to delete them afterwards.

The other method is installing XP on a 2nd partition/drive and then telling Vista to install to the first partition and then just formatting the 2nd partition/drive

I can't remember what I did now... I think I formatted everything and installed XP (with nothing else) and then ran the Vista Upgrade.

Turns out the problems we discussed here are more widespread than just the edition I have. And now it's confirmed;

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070128-8717.html

This well and truly sucks.

I have a new Mobo and gfx card here, and tomorrow morning I was gonna do a clean install of Vista Ultimate after I'd put my new PC together.

Now I have to reinstall and reactivate XP on my new hardware, then install Vista? I know this will give me a clean system, but still it's just an extra step I shouldn't have to take. Whats more I'll probably have to ring MS up to reactivate XP as all my hardware has completely changed.

Not sure if I should even bother now.

ffs.

q

I have no idea I sent an email to microsoft through that website and they will get back to me. But if you read closely it s tates: buy a licence that has this feature and neither ultimate nor business appear in this section. I'm still confused over these changes but I want X64 and ultimate is the only ed that includes this in the package.

IMHO this is unacceptable. There is no reason the installer couldn't just ask for your XP CD and/or product key, then even go online and verify it if they want. It works fine for now until you want to format. Then what? Sure you could backup your drive after you install it but then when you restore it a year later you will have to do a years worth of updates. You could slipstream the updates to the upgrade disc but then if you do that you still have to install XP or something first. Users are better off pirating. Nice job Microsoft! :rolleyes:

um has anyone noticed this:

APPLIES TO

? Windows Vista Home Premium

? Windows Vista Home Basic

? Windows Vista Home Premium 64-bit edition

? Windows Vista Home Basic 64-bit edition

? Windows Vista Starter

Windows Vista Ultimate and Business don't appear any word if those versions can do a clean install/upgrade?

I have been trying to figure this out all day since I plan on buying the Ultimate Upgrade tonight. Can anyone confirm this?

I'm not sure that article is right, if you read the first post in this thread, the guy is saying he can't do a clean upgrade boot from a Business Upgrade disc.

So who's right?

q

The disks are the same, its the key! you cannot do a format, clean dvd boot install from a business upgrade key. Trust me i've tried all the possible ways

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!