• 0

[c#] Database Search as you type functionality


Question

Hi guys,

I have a situation where I need to be able to search a database as the user types. It's running locally in SQL Server 2005, so I've been querying every time the textbox text changes. This doesn't seem to work. Basically, if I search for '2334', '2' might have 5000 results, whereas '2334' might have 7. If I type '2334' really quickly, my current method flashes the results for '2334', then shows me the results for '2'. (D'oh!)

Basically, on text change, I prepare my query, execute it, and databind a datagridview to it. This seems to work, but not when you type quickly.

What is the proper way to do this? Then, how can I have it so that, let's say the user is typing '2334', in the text box, but by the time '2334' is in, '2' hasn't finished yet, so it can ignore the searches for '23', and '233'?

Thanks

9 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I don't know about C#, but I can do that in Java. If C# supports mutilthreading, then it's easy "by concept".

You register a listener on that text box. When the user starts typing, you create a thread to search the database, when the user keeps typing:

1- create a thread the search the database with the user's current value entered

2 - check to see if that previous thread is still running, if so, kill it and let the current thread finish execution.

  • 0

You could use the Binding Source's Filter method to do it, but then the search text would have to come from only one column.

As the user types on the textbox event, just use BindingSource1.Filter = "%COLUMNNAME% - '" + TextBox1.Text + '"

  • 0

I remember i tried to implement this a while back, it caused the biggest issues, it's definitely not trivial, as someone mentioned you have to spawn a new thread and then check if a previous thread is running or not, and because of the nature of STA model, having to route your UI calls back on the UI thread, this causes so many issues, i mean in theory doing the thread thing actually works, but when you act like a stupid user, and type really fast and quickly backspace, it causes issues.

Many of the time filters work off index'ed files, rather than hammering the database on every new text update. The trade-off being, the results won't be up to date until it's next indexed.

I wasn't too sure about the filter's property in the binding source it always looked interesting never tried it, but, i think it's based off the premises that the data is pre-loaded into the datagrid or whatever control it maybe binded to, so the results may not be up to date one very filter call. But i suppose you can just do a re-bind on every filter call.

Also there was one thing i noticed in these filter implementations whether it be in Vista or in Spotlight, there's a delay from when a user types to when the results appear, i think it does this to prevent rapid text typing with crazy users, so maybe you can consider that as well, implementing a delay from the text-entry until the execution of the filtering method.

  • 0

you have to do the threaded approach.

but you have to be VERY careful not to hammer your database.

for instance: you could set up a thread to do the search and only do the search every other second or so while the user is typing. that'd help you NOT kill your db when tons of users are doing the same thing. another thing you could do is index a smaller table in your database of common keywords that the user could search for and search on that (the index that Winston talked)

and about the threads, C# has a you can simply use the BeginInvoke (read the docs on these) methods to call stuff on the secondary thread as if you were on the main thread.

you have to be very careful with the threads, though :)

  • 0

I'm not worried about hammering the database. It's not a multi-user application. It attaches the database at runtime in sql server 2005 express.

Thanks guys, hopefully I can come up with something. Any more tips, or a link to a good article, would be welcome.

Ok. Why BeginInvoke()?

I've been doing stuff like this:

void whatever()

{

if (this.invokerequired)

{

this.invoke(new whateverdelegate(whatever));

}

else

{

do whatever

}

}

Maybe i need to read up more on threading.

  • 0
  Menge said:
and about the threads, C# has a you can simply use the BeginInvoke (read the docs on these) methods to call stuff on the secondary thread as if you were on the main thread.

you have to be very careful with the threads, though :)

Definitely. Also if you want to have it easier, in the case of doing it in .NET 2.0, you can make use of the BackgroundWorker component to help you manage calls to the UI.

  • 0

Okok. Let's see if I have this right.

Every search I want to make initiates a thread. Every thread has a delay, 500ms, or 1sec or something before it does anything. After this delay, it checks to see if it's the last thread in my collection of threads. If it's not, it aborts. If it is, it ensures that there are no threads before it doing stuff. If there are, it aborts them. Then, it performs the search and updates the UI.

Good? Bad? Fundamentally flawed in every way shape and form possible, making you feel bad for my copy of visual studio?

  • 0

Anyone see any problems with this? It seems to work....

private void doThreadWork(object dataholder)
{
	if (so == null) return;
	System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(1000);
	if (System.Threading.Thread.CurrentThread == lastThread)
	{
		for (int i = 0; i < 50; i++)
		{
			if (!aThreadIsWorking) break;
			System.Threading.Thread.Sleep(100);
		}
		try
		{
			aThreadIsWorking = true;
			//Get my list of stuff from the database and process it.
			//Send it off to a threadsafe method that sets the datagridview's DataSource
		}
		finally
		{
			aThreadIsWorking = false;
		}
	}
}

to start it all off:

System.Threading.Thread x = new Thread(new ParameterizedThreadStart(doThreadWork));
lastThread = x;
x.Start(data);

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Can" is fine. I want the ability for it to "not." Actually, I would prefer vice versa. But it has to be optional, otherwise companies wouldn't be too happy.
    • ChatGPT can now connect to Outlook, Teams, Gmail, Google Drive, and other services by Pradeep Viswanathan Apart from regular consumers, ChatGPT is also growing fast among business users. In fact, OpenAI now has 3 million paying (Enterprise, Team, and Edu) business users, up from 2 million in February. During a live stream today targeted toward business users, OpenAI announced that ChatGPT can now connect to more external services to pull in real-time context and provide more useful responses for users. The following are some of the external connectors available in ChatGPT Deep Research for Plus, Pro, Team, Enterprise, and Edu users: Microsoft Outlook Microsoft Teams Microsoft SharePoint Dropbox Box Google Drive Gmail Liner In addition to the above, IT admins in organizations can now build custom ChatGPT connectors using the popular Model Context Protocol (MCP). These custom connectors will allow organizations to make use of the data available inside their proprietary systems and other apps within ChatGPT, alongside pre-built connectors. Today, the ChatGPT team also announced a new feature called record mode for ChatGPT Team users on macOS. The record mode feature will allow users to capture meeting audio and get meeting transcriptions, meeting action items, summaries, etc. ChatGPT record mode will also be available to Plus, Pro, Enterprise, and Edu users in the future. Kevin Weil, Chief Product Officer at OpenAI, tweeted the following regarding today’s launch: While ChatGPT's new connectors and features mark significant progress, it faces a formidable challenge in the enterprise market against Microsoft 365 Copilot, which enjoys native integration within the Microsoft 365 ecosystem.
    • I decided to give this a try and, wow. I like it. One of the most customizable browsers I've ever used I think, and it even has the classic menu bar. That's one of the reasons I've stuck with Firefox for so long. Not sure if I'll make this my main browser yet but it's looking good so far.
    • No messaging app from a large commercial entity is really encrypted to a point they are actually unable to access your content. If you trust whatsapp and friends to do this either you are a fool.
    • From my point of view this seems like a good thing? Option to pay as you go in an otherwise Subscription app? Yes Please! Free Windsurf + BYOK = Now I have a reason to try Windsurf.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Apprentice
      DarkShrunken went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Dedicated
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      DarkShrunken earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rookie
      Pat-Garrett went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Week One Done
      Outdoor Saunaio earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      331
    2. 2
      snowy owl
      165
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      158
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      154
    5. 5
      Xenon
      127
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!