PS3 "Live" type Service available?


Recommended Posts

Hey,

I'm asking this question for a friend that is considering a PS3.

Does the PS3 let you talk to people that you are playing multiplayer games with? ...Similar to the 360's "Live" service?

If so, does it come with the headphones? ...and is the matchmaking process as easy as Live?

Thanks.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/536599-ps3-live-type-service-available/
Share on other sites

Hey,

I'm asking this question for a friend that is considering a PS3.

Does the PS3 let you talk to people that you are playing multiplayer games with? ...Similar to the 360's "Live" service?

If so, does it come with the headphones? ...and is the matchmaking process as easy as Live?

Thanks.

yes and no, there is an online service but it is not nearly as feature rich as live is per say

Yes you are able to use the mic within games to chat. Also, with the next "big" update in March.. inclusive within the firmware update is rumored to be such features like voice/video chat and what not. With that being said, it's also stated that eventually we should be able to do voice/video chat with others (even those outside of the game) while still being in the game itself. All part of the multitasking fixes and new features they are going to add this spring and into summer. Some is speculation and rumored, but other little things have pretty much been confirmed. Wonder what else they'll come up with. PSN will be a whole different animal by then.. we don't need "Live" :p

we don't need "Live" :p

I'm just curious here, and this is judging by all your posts, not just this one... but why exactly are you so against the Xbox? I don't get it, why dismiss something which is arguably just as good as the PS3, if not better? You aren't a Sony employee or anything (I'm assuming), so how does it benefit you? Join the dark side, we're all nice you know.

I'm just curious here, and this is judging by all your posts, not just this one... but why exactly are you so against the Xbox? I don't get it, why dismiss something which is arguably just as good as the PS3, if not better? You aren't a Sony employee or anything (I'm assuming), so how does it benefit you? Join the dark side, we're all nice you know.

I'm not against the XBox.. I'm just supporting the Playstation 3. I'm pretty sure you'd throuw a cry baby fit if I placed the same question in your hands only vice versa. Not everybody in this world wants to be a sheep.. some of us can and will have other preferences. Nothing wrong with supporting the PSN and it's future, but according to you and some of your playmates there is? Odd. :blink:

:iiam: ...he's not a happy camper when it comes to Xbox :p

Yeah, I don't even understand why he has a 360. All he does is complain about it.

As stated, at least for right now, PSN is broken in comparison to XBL, but I guess I'd have to agree with TDQ - with the exception of neglecting it all together (which, for some reason or other, wouldn't surprise me if they did), the only thing Sony could possibly do to it is make it better.

-Spenser

I'm not against the XBox.. I'm just supporting the Playstation 3. I'm pretty sure you'd throuw a cry baby fit if I placed the same question in your hands only vice versa. Not everybody in this world wants to be a sheep.. some of us can and will have other preferences. Nothing wrong with supporting the PSN and it's future, but according to you and some of your playmates there is? Odd. :blink:

No, I'm not saying don't support the PS3, nothing wrong with that, it's just some of the things you say puzzle me. Like if Sony does something wrong like blatantly lie, you'll say "oh let's not worry about it" and "we don't need Live", when clearly it is better than PSN. Meh, I guess you really really love PS. I just like to keep my options open, whatever is better for my money, I'll go for.

Oh and I have nothing against PS3, I just disagree with some of Sony's business practices of late. I would buy one when it's released (games like R&C and MGS I love) if it wasn't so expensive, in my eyes yes it is too expensive. When the prices come down.

No, I'm not saying don't support the PS3, nothing wrong with that, it's just some of the things you say puzzle me. Like if Sony does something wrong like blatantly lie, you'll say "oh let's not worry about it" and "we don't need Live", when clearly it is better than PSN. Meh, I guess you really really love PS. I just like to keep my options open, whatever is better for my money, I'll go for.

Oh and I have nothing against PS3, I just disagree with some of Sony's business practices of late. I would buy one when it's released (games like R&C and MGS I love) if it wasn't so expensive, in my eyes yes it is too expensive. When the prices come down.

Does it puzzle you because it's not your way of thinking? Guess so, but you know.. we're all entitled to our preferences. I can understand the expensive comment, but I guess some of us don't mind shelling out the cash for things like this. It's entertainment to me and I love everything it has to offer.. the future is only bright from here and I'm sure there are plenty more offerings to come from the PSN and Sony itself. Some of us don't let the media ramblings or forum/blog babble interfere with our decision. Some of the business practice is questional as of late, but you could nail that label on any other company if you really wanted to. Part of the cost of being a big time corporation is being able to go under the crosshairs every now and again. Entertainment is a very expensive industry and it won't get any cheaper.. so what's not to love about a free network service for video games? :yes:

No, I'm not saying don't support the PS3, nothing wrong with that, it's just some of the things you say puzzle me. Like if Sony does something wrong like blatantly lie, you'll say "oh let's not worry about it" and "we don't need Live", when clearly it is better than PSN. Meh, I guess you really really love PS. I just like to keep my options open, whatever is better for my money, I'll go for.

Oh and I have nothing against PS3, I just disagree with some of Sony's business practices of late. I would buy one when it's released (games like R&C and MGS I love) if it wasn't so expensive, in my eyes yes it is too expensive. When the prices come down.

I've honestly seen the opposite. If Microsoft does something wrong or Nintendo even, it's just whatever, they'll fix it. But if Sony turns around and does the same thing, it's like "OMFG SONY Sux0rs... xb0x pwns ps3".

And I do agree about the price, Sony would have had great things going for them if it was just a little cheaper.

I've honestly seen the opposite. If Microsoft does something wrong or Nintendo even, it's just whatever, they'll fix it. But if Sony turns around and does the same thing, it's like "OMFG SONY Sux0rs... xb0x pwns ps3".

And I do agree about the price, Sony would have had great things going for them if it was just a little cheaper.

That's because Sony lie, then lie again, and keep on lying. When Microsoft or Nintendo mess up, they are quick to try and fix things, while Sony just go quiet. Like that scaling issue, it can scale horizontally fine using the new firmware, but, for vertical scaling, it needs a hardware scaler.

That's because Sony lie, then lie again, and keep on lying. When Microsoft or Nintendo mess up, they are quick to try and fix things, while Sony just go quiet. Like that scaling issue, it can scale horizontally fine using the new firmware, but, for vertical scaling, it needs a hardware scaler.

Those words in bold pretty much mean I can ignore your opinion on the subject, MS are masters are going dark when the stuff hits the fan.

"Our" network? Why did you phrase it like that. Makes you sound like you have a part in it's creation.

Let's be honest, can Sony provide a network like 'Live' for free? I don't think so. Are Sony good at making software? Nope, certainly not, look at their SDK.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Pretty nice tool, thanks
    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      83
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!