CPU usage 100% for no reason

By cannedmeat
in Microsoft (Windows)

 Share

Recommended Posts

Rookie

cannedmeat

Posted
Posted

I have a PC that that I bought awhile ago and it is 100% perfect according to the vista upgrade advisor app.

I am using my powertogether (MS Campaign) version of vista business(32bit) and it installs without a hitch. but it is laggy. I used actual drivers for vista on my Vid card, Printer Etc. but it is slow and laggy

I used EVEREST home edition to snoop out my specs.

my specs:

Compaq SR1730Z CTO(Custom to order)

AMD64 3700+ Sandiego w/ 1MB cache

2GB PC3200 DDR ram

160GB SATA drive

lightscribe DVD burner (dual layer

no name DVD-Rom

SB Audigy4

ATI x1800GTO 256MB DDR3

ATI Xpress200 chipset (ATI RS482/RX482 northbridge, ATI SB450 southbridge)

Now mind you, it runs nicely otherwise albeit the lag and the task manager telling me my CPU is screaming along at 80-100% usage.

My best educated guess is my chipset doesn't play well. So i spoke to a rep at HP and he said that ATI hasn't released official drivers yet for Vista. no idea when but HP does have Vista added under the support/drivers. So i guess that will come soon!?!

what causes the CPU to run so high when my task manager says it is running at or near 100% the idle process uses like 80% but nothing else seems to come about when i click the "processes by user" button.

any ideas? I like Vista and it was free and otherwise a fun OS to tinker with.

BTW, I tried to use the WEI (windows experience index) rating app and it always gets to the end then says that too much interference causes it to not be able to finish.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538003-cpu-usage-100-for-no-reason/
Share on other sites
Mentor

Nightwind Hawk

Posted
Posted

Yeah, what Mio said. If you click the Performance tab, your CPU shouldn't be too high (mine's 0-2% idle).

However, CPU aside, memory does seem to be a high-end resource :unsure: With just tasks such as Firefox and Gaim, Vista uses up nearly 1.3 GB of memory. Anybody else noticing this?

Rising Star

nautiqueskier

Posted
Posted

Vista actually doesn't use as much RAM as it seems, but it caches your frequently accessed files on startup so that frequently-used apps and such will load faster. This is otherwise known as SuperFetch, and is why hard drives tend to do a lot of "thrashing" when Vista first boots.

If another program actually needs any of this memory, Vista will instantly release it.

The idea here (and accurately) is that free RAM is wasted RAM so Vista tries to use as much RAM as possible.

Nobody seems to get this and reports that Vista uses massive amounts of RAM, and while it definitely uses more RAM than XP, its not as bad as it first appears.

Experienced

solardog

Posted
Posted
  Ames said:
Vista actually doesn't use as much RAM as it seems, but it caches your frequently accessed files on startup so that frequently-used apps and such will load faster. This is otherwise known as SuperFetch, and is why hard drives tend to do a lot of "thrashing" when Vista first boots.

If another program actually needs any of this memory, Vista will instantly release it.

The idea here (and accurately) is that free RAM is wasted RAM so Vista tries to use as much RAM as possible.

Nobody seems to get this and reports that Vista uses massive amounts of RAM, and while it definitely uses more RAM than XP, its not as bad as it first appears.

Thank you. That clears that up for me very nicely.

Rookie

cannedmeat

Posted
  • Author
Posted
  Brandon Live said:
Have you clicked the "Show process from all users" button and then clicked the CPU column header to sort by CPU usage and see which process is using the most CPU cycles?

yeah but, there's nothing showing why other than system kernel which is running like a cat in heat :cry:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • Microsoft quietly burying a massive Windows 7 hardware driver feature as Windows 11 kills it

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      Microsoft quietly burying a massive Windows 7 hardware driver feature as Windows 11 kills it by Sayan Sen Last month Microsoft announced a big update for Windows hardware drivers. The company declared that it was killing Windows Device metadata and the Windows Metadata and Internet Services (WMIS). For those wondering what it is, device metadata, as the name suggests, is the collection of additional, user-facing information that an original equipment manufacturer (OEM) provides about a hardware device. The feature was introduced with Windows 7 and can include stuff like icons, logos, descriptive texts, among other things, that help the Windows UI display details about such devices in places like Task Manager or Device Manager. This was a huge deal back in the day when Windows 7 debuted. The company called the feature "Device Stage" and Microsoft described it as a "new visual interface" that essentially worked like a "multi-function version of Autoplay where it displays all the applications, services, and information related to your device." It is often considered synonymous with the Windows "Devices and Printers" Control Panel applet. Neowin did an in-depth overview of the feature when it first launched which you can find in its dedicated article here. The Windows OS was able to obtain the device experience metadata from the WMIS, but now that the feature is being deprecated, Microsoft has begun removing information about Device Stage from its official support documents. Neowin noticed while browsing that a support article regarding automatic Windows hardware drivers was updated for Windows 11 and 10 sometime last year after the release of Windows 11 24H2. Previously, this article was geared for Windows 7 and was much longer. It also contained information about Device Stage, which, as mentioned above, was a headlining feature on Windows 7. In the said article, the section "If Windows can't find information about your device in Device Stage" has been deleted. You can find the archived version of the support page here. Aside from shortening the amount of information on the page, Microsoft has also added some more details on it. The company has now tried to define what the Microsoft Basic Display Adapter is, how updating drivers through Device Manager works, as well as a thorough and detailed troubleshooting section for common hardware driver errors on Windows, including one for USB-C. You can find all the new details on the updated support page here on Microsoft's website.
    • Microsoft Edge is getting new media control center, AI-powered history search, and more

      By +MrElectrifyer · Posted

      Sounds creepy to say the least. Don't need nor want AI having access to my history. They're claiming it to be an "offline" model now, but how can we guarantee they don't go behind our backs and change that?
    • Apple warns Australia against joining EU in mandating iPhone app sideloading

      By +MrElectrifyer · Posted

      Exactly! Without those fundamentals you've mentioned, Democracy is literally just Demonstration of Crazy, nothing to be proud of in such system.
    • Microsoft: Edge performs better than Google Chrome on Windows in ad blocking and more

      By monterxz · Posted

      Still I see almost no ads in mobile Edge unlike Chrome. So their browser is much better at blocking ads than Chrome and it is a fact. It even blocks ads on YouTube and you can add simple custom block filters. Also, Edge still support manifest v2 on desktop, so I'll look for another browser when I start seeing ads again.
    • Here's why it makes sense to name it iOS 26 and why it doesn't

      By +sphbecker · Posted

      Considering they consistently release a new version every year, I think it makes perfect sense. There is a minor pain point at the time of the change, so as long as they only change it once, we get over it and end up in a better place. The issue with MS' naming scheme is that they change their mind so frequently. 3.1, 95, 98, ME, 2000, XP, Vista, 7, 8, 8.1 10, there is no consistency. That was the issue, not the choice of naming the OS after the year. Minor correction: Windows 7 was 6.1. Even Windows 10 was version 6.4 at launch, but they retroactively changed it to 10.0 early on, along with an announcement that they would no longer track the kerel version and OS version separately...then proceeded to call Windows 11 version 10.0.2, so yeah, MS sucks at naming.

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      viraltui earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      viraltui earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      LunaFerret earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Ricky Chan earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      maimutza earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      481
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      263
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      238
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      230
    5. 5
      Edouard
      176
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!