Recommended Posts

I recently found out that my website that I designed to work with IE7 and Firefox 2, doesn't work properly with IE6. I'd like to see a recent chart or something that tells me the percentage of users between IE6 and IE7. Anyone know where I can get one thats updated regularly?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538810-percentage-of-ie6-to-ie7-users/
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, IE6, however outdated and insecure, is still to widespread to not support it. (Unless you already have a target audience and you know not many people use IE6)

Yea I'd say that updating to IE7 is a must for everyone! :shiftyninja:

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

It is the people's fault if they are still using IE 6. I have no sympathy for them.

1) If they do not trust IE 6, then that is thier fault. They can read reviews on the Internet; or, use their common sense, open their eyes and see the phishing filters and security measures that are staring them right in the face!

2) If they don't like IE 7 then again that is thier fault. They can get FireFox or another browswer (especially one with skins). I'm sure they can find a browser they like, out there somewhere. Or they can just realise that IE 7 is the future and is MUCH better!

3) Too lazy!!!?!!? Again, this is thier fault! If they are too lazy to upgrade (does not take much effort at all), then why can't the developers be too lazy to support IE 6? (which would probably take a little bit more effort to do than a lazy customer clickin "Install" in Windows Update).

I have no sympathy for people who refuse to upgrade to IE 6, it is thier fault. Also, you cannot say that people do not know about IE 7 (I know you haven't, but some will); EVERYBODY who has an Internet connection, and a pair of working eyes, have been informed that a new IE version is out, by Microsoft, through Windows Update and other mediums.

IE 6 is redundant now in my opinion and EVERYBODY should upgrade to IE 7.

P.S. I agree that some small and large business may not have upgraded (e.g. my school), but again, this falls under the "lazy" aspect! It doesn't take more than a day to upgrade a whole school network! And the holidays would be an excellent time, yet alas they still have not.)

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

While I agree that any mission critical and corporate websites must still support IE6, I do encourage everyone to drop support for it in favour of a warning message telling the user to update to IE7 on their personal websites. IE6 needs to be phased out and any little bit to compel a user to update helps.

In terms of market share, it's still very large and yes corporate/business/money-making websites, etc, should still support it. It also depends on the target audience. It'll likely be reasonable if you drop support for IE6 on a website that gets say 10% of IE6 visitors, as in a lot of tech websites.

I understand about the requirements which is one reason why maybe they should support IE 6.

But in reply to the above comment: If people are not genuinely interested in upgrading IE, then it is thier fault if some of thier favorite websites do not show up properly. I have no sympathy for them. Software updates are there for a reason and IE 6 has a newer update - thus making IE 6 OLD and redundant!

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

wise up.

just like software developers should instantly stop making stuff for XP just because vista has come out?

maybe in a few years...same with IE6. it is so prevalent that only an idiot wouldn't at least try to make their site accessible with IE6. especially if you run a business website where you sell...

When I think about it, it would be stupid for developers to stop supporting IE 6 (however, they should encourage people to upgrade by putting a message in thier site).

I agree fully with the person who wrote the message under my first message, now I think about it.

  • 1 month later...

I'm currently using my dad's computer because the power supply took a dump in my computer, and one of the first things I did was put in 64bit Windows XP and upgrade to IE7. Anyone who is a hardcore internet user (browses the internet for horurs on end) and is up to snuff with internet security will upgrade to IE7 (that's probably why the percentage of IE7 users are so low -- there aren't many people out there who are actually intelligent about internet security). There's no reason not to upgrade to IE7 unless you're using a pirated copy of Windows XP and can't make the transition to IE7. In that case, for your security, use Opera or Firefox 2. Do not use IE6, you're only setting yourself up for a disaster, granted you hit the right website.

predator001: His point is to get people to stop using the insecure IE6 and start using the more secure, and smarter IE7. With all the phishing going around in websites, and fraud, you would be silly not to use IE7 over IE6, granted you have the choice. The problem is, more than half of the Windows XP users actually run a pirated copy of the operating system and can't make the transition to IE7 because of validation issues. Only one of my friends actually use a legit copy of Windows XP, everyone else I know is all illegal. If website developers would stop supporting IE6 and would only support IE7, that would not only imcrase the amount of sales for Microsoft, but it would also ensure that more people are securely browsing the internet.

There are a lot of cool features in Firefox 2, Opera, and IE7 alike, such as tabbed browsing, spell checking, text-to-speech, tighter security, and higher compatibility. Firefox 2 has the spell checking, they all have tabbed browsing, but IE7 has the increased security and compatibility, whereas if you turn to Opera, you have text-to-speech and a lot of bandwidth feedback that neither IE7 nor Firefox 2 provide. The theory here is, if you're using IE6 and you're concerned about your internet security, then stop it -- pick up Firefox 2 or Opera if you can't get passed the validation to install IE7. All three browsers have a lot of innovative freatures that make browsing the internet more secure and fun. I chose IE7 over them all because its's made by Microsoft, which means it's going to have the best compatibility, it has a lot of security features, and it's the "official" supported medium for browsing on more than most of the websites. Firefox 2 has a little bit of compatibility issues with some websites, and so does Opera, but they're all great web browsers, and they're all more secure and more compatibile than IE6.

That is only visitors to the w3c sites... and talk about a massively skewed numbers at that... in the REAL world its no where near 30+% for FF AND ie still accounts for about 80% of the markey in total

  • 10 months later...

Is there a way to find the percentages of the browsers from the portals sites? I would like to know what percentages yahoo, msn, google and aol are getting.

It would be cool if all sites revealed what kind of browsers that they were getting. This way you can find a site that has a similar demographic to yours and use that to base your browser support decisions on. Though I do think it is always a good idea to suport as many browsers as possible. The only exception might be if you are making a site that is targeted at a niche area. If i was making a site for Apple news I would not be to concerned about IE.

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
    • Depends on what you need. Might be a bit clearer on what you plan to do with it. Sort of a waste if you get the newest and greatest, but don't know how to use it.
    • NTLite 2026.06.11200 by Razvan Serea NTLite is a Windows configuration tool that allows you to modify your existing Windows install or an image yet to be deployed, remove Windows components, configure and integrate, speed up the Windows deployment process. Reduce Windows footprint on your RAM and storage drive memory. Remove components of your choice, guarded by compatibility safety mechanisms, which speed up finding that sweet spot. Windows Unattended feature support, providing many commonly used options on a single page for easy setup. Easily integrate a single or multiple drivers, update or language packages. Package integration features smart sorting, enabling you to seamlessly add packages for integration and the tool will apply them in the appropriate order, keeping hotfix compatibility in check. One of the important new features of NTLite (compared to its predecessors) is the ability to modify an already installed the operating system, by removing unnecessary components. Supports Windows 11, 10, 8.1 and 7, x86 and x64, live and image. Server editions of the same versions, excluding support for component removals and feature configuration. ARM64 image support in the alpha stage. Does not support Checked/Debug, Embedded, IoT editions, nor Vista or XP. NTLite 2026.06.11200 changelog: New Secure Boot Migration support: Verification, certificate staging, and boot-manager/sector update across the Image, Updates, Apply, and Create-ISO pages (2023 CA migration, optional 2011 revocation, Anti-rollback, Boot sector choice etc) Secure Boot Host Readiness: Live host Secure Boot migration monitor and Servicing-task control Option under Image page - C:\Windows row, or load the host as the target - Updates - Secure Boot Image: 'Sort mounted images first' option for the image list in Menu-Settings UI: Hover description card for Components and Unattended pages, selectable text and quick access to Compatibility options Command line: Relay commands into the already-running instance Enables controlling already running NTLite via ntlite.exe Use /NewInstance to launch an additional instance using CLI operations (premium) UI: 'New instance' option via main menu instead of a secondary ntlite.exe prompt Apply: Hide individual Apply-page notes with a per-note dismiss (X), critical excluded Settings: 'Unsigned RDP file launch warnings' tweak (RDP client), bypassing the April 2026 security-update prompt on RDP connections Upgrade Image: Live OS and deployed image editing now unlocked on free/test licenses, same licensing as images Image: 'Recompress' option in manual dialog Remove Editions to shrink the WIM in one session Image: SWM part size set inline on the Apply page and image dialogs, split-size popup retired Image: Relative 'Last change' dates; editions grouped by build time to reduce noise Image: 'Forget - Missing' on the Edit-cache menu to mass drop entries whose folder is gone Components: Root groups reorganized - user-facing groups first, system/critical last Components: Show filter options to view components by Template or App-type, since Apps are now merged into groups Presets: Delete confirmation now lists the multi-selected preset names UI: Design update propagated to the rest of the tool UI: Filter and search match words in any order and partially, better results filtering Components Unattended: Input-locale language derives from the user locale, with an independent keyboard picker, enables combinations previously unavailable Unattended: Input-locale now allows for a user value override Unattended: Localization OOBE WinPE now can be copied with the new WinPE Copy OOBE localization toggle, enter locale settings once for both stages Updates: Downloader greys and locks updates the image already carries (hotfix and MSIX) Updates: Resume interrupted update downloads Command line: Many upgrades, see /?, now prints help to the console or redirected output UI-Translation: Finnish language added, also thanks for Chinese Traditional (Matt), French (tistou77), Italian (clarensio), Russian (RDS), Swedish (1FF), Vietnamese (Vu Anh Vu) Fix Components: Containers removal breaking Apps deployment Components: Microsoft Account had leftovers when Easy Migrate is kept Image: Export to an existing WIM improvements, Append renamed to Merge Image: Improved 26H1 live removal support Image: No more 'X:\ not accessible' popup for certain drives during image scan Presets: Manual image refresh picks up presets added/removed outside the app Tweaks: Disabled visual-effect animations no longer return after first logon on a new profile Tweaks: Live Visual Effects toggles (animations, drag full windows, font smoothing) now apply correctly Download: NTLite 2026.06.11200 | 20.5 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Link: NTLite Home Page | NTLite Features | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      258
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!