Recommended Posts

I recently found out that my website that I designed to work with IE7 and Firefox 2, doesn't work properly with IE6. I'd like to see a recent chart or something that tells me the percentage of users between IE6 and IE7. Anyone know where I can get one thats updated regularly?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/538810-percentage-of-ie6-to-ie7-users/
Share on other sites

Unfortunately, IE6, however outdated and insecure, is still to widespread to not support it. (Unless you already have a target audience and you know not many people use IE6)

Yea I'd say that updating to IE7 is a must for everyone! :shiftyninja:

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

It is the people's fault if they are still using IE 6. I have no sympathy for them.

1) If they do not trust IE 6, then that is thier fault. They can read reviews on the Internet; or, use their common sense, open their eyes and see the phishing filters and security measures that are staring them right in the face!

2) If they don't like IE 7 then again that is thier fault. They can get FireFox or another browswer (especially one with skins). I'm sure they can find a browser they like, out there somewhere. Or they can just realise that IE 7 is the future and is MUCH better!

3) Too lazy!!!?!!? Again, this is thier fault! If they are too lazy to upgrade (does not take much effort at all), then why can't the developers be too lazy to support IE 6? (which would probably take a little bit more effort to do than a lazy customer clickin "Install" in Windows Update).

I have no sympathy for people who refuse to upgrade to IE 6, it is thier fault. Also, you cannot say that people do not know about IE 7 (I know you haven't, but some will); EVERYBODY who has an Internet connection, and a pair of working eyes, have been informed that a new IE version is out, by Microsoft, through Windows Update and other mediums.

IE 6 is redundant now in my opinion and EVERYBODY should upgrade to IE 7.

P.S. I agree that some small and large business may not have upgraded (e.g. my school), but again, this falls under the "lazy" aspect! It doesn't take more than a day to upgrade a whole school network! And the holidays would be an excellent time, yet alas they still have not.)

I've said it before and I'll say it again, not supporting IE6 is a stupid move as a web designer or developer. There are simply too many people out there using IE6 because 1) they don't trust IE7, 2) they don't like IE7, or 3) they're just lazy. It's far too early to cut support for IE6 as IE7 has only been out for months. Besides, making something work in IE6 as opposed to IE7 isn't that drastic. Use the IE conditional statements to include certain stylesheets, and in your stylesheet, using IE6 specific stlyes: * html #header { } /* Applies to IE6 and below only */

While I agree that any mission critical and corporate websites must still support IE6, I do encourage everyone to drop support for it in favour of a warning message telling the user to update to IE7 on their personal websites. IE6 needs to be phased out and any little bit to compel a user to update helps.

In terms of market share, it's still very large and yes corporate/business/money-making websites, etc, should still support it. It also depends on the target audience. It'll likely be reasonable if you drop support for IE6 on a website that gets say 10% of IE6 visitors, as in a lot of tech websites.

I understand about the requirements which is one reason why maybe they should support IE 6.

But in reply to the above comment: If people are not genuinely interested in upgrading IE, then it is thier fault if some of thier favorite websites do not show up properly. I have no sympathy for them. Software updates are there for a reason and IE 6 has a newer update - thus making IE 6 OLD and redundant!

Developers of software and websites SHOULD stop supporting IE 6!

wise up.

just like software developers should instantly stop making stuff for XP just because vista has come out?

maybe in a few years...same with IE6. it is so prevalent that only an idiot wouldn't at least try to make their site accessible with IE6. especially if you run a business website where you sell...

When I think about it, it would be stupid for developers to stop supporting IE 6 (however, they should encourage people to upgrade by putting a message in thier site).

I agree fully with the person who wrote the message under my first message, now I think about it.

  • 1 month later...

I'm currently using my dad's computer because the power supply took a dump in my computer, and one of the first things I did was put in 64bit Windows XP and upgrade to IE7. Anyone who is a hardcore internet user (browses the internet for horurs on end) and is up to snuff with internet security will upgrade to IE7 (that's probably why the percentage of IE7 users are so low -- there aren't many people out there who are actually intelligent about internet security). There's no reason not to upgrade to IE7 unless you're using a pirated copy of Windows XP and can't make the transition to IE7. In that case, for your security, use Opera or Firefox 2. Do not use IE6, you're only setting yourself up for a disaster, granted you hit the right website.

predator001: His point is to get people to stop using the insecure IE6 and start using the more secure, and smarter IE7. With all the phishing going around in websites, and fraud, you would be silly not to use IE7 over IE6, granted you have the choice. The problem is, more than half of the Windows XP users actually run a pirated copy of the operating system and can't make the transition to IE7 because of validation issues. Only one of my friends actually use a legit copy of Windows XP, everyone else I know is all illegal. If website developers would stop supporting IE6 and would only support IE7, that would not only imcrase the amount of sales for Microsoft, but it would also ensure that more people are securely browsing the internet.

There are a lot of cool features in Firefox 2, Opera, and IE7 alike, such as tabbed browsing, spell checking, text-to-speech, tighter security, and higher compatibility. Firefox 2 has the spell checking, they all have tabbed browsing, but IE7 has the increased security and compatibility, whereas if you turn to Opera, you have text-to-speech and a lot of bandwidth feedback that neither IE7 nor Firefox 2 provide. The theory here is, if you're using IE6 and you're concerned about your internet security, then stop it -- pick up Firefox 2 or Opera if you can't get passed the validation to install IE7. All three browsers have a lot of innovative freatures that make browsing the internet more secure and fun. I chose IE7 over them all because its's made by Microsoft, which means it's going to have the best compatibility, it has a lot of security features, and it's the "official" supported medium for browsing on more than most of the websites. Firefox 2 has a little bit of compatibility issues with some websites, and so does Opera, but they're all great web browsers, and they're all more secure and more compatibile than IE6.

That is only visitors to the w3c sites... and talk about a massively skewed numbers at that... in the REAL world its no where near 30+% for FF AND ie still accounts for about 80% of the markey in total

  • 10 months later...

Is there a way to find the percentages of the browsers from the portals sites? I would like to know what percentages yahoo, msn, google and aol are getting.

It would be cool if all sites revealed what kind of browsers that they were getting. This way you can find a site that has a similar demographic to yours and use that to base your browser support decisions on. Though I do think it is always a good idea to suport as many browsers as possible. The only exception might be if you are making a site that is targeted at a niche area. If i was making a site for Apple news I would not be to concerned about IE.

  • 4 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • google, meta, microsoft, true cancers of modern society
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 changelog: Fixed a bug where Overwrite behaved as Overwrite All during same-drive move operations. AdvancedInstaller fixed the installer’s security vulnerability: EXE Bootstrapper resolved the %appdata% location incorrectly for the System account. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 28 | 14.6 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • First exciting thing to come to Windows in a long time ! This is the kind of things they should focus on, instead of cramming as much AI as they can in everything.
    • New AMD graphics driver fixes install issues and FSR 4.1 crashes on RX 7000 GPUs by Taras Buria AMD is rolling out yet another graphics driver. Version 26.6.4 is now available for download, bringing two important fixes. One is for those still using Windows 10 and having trouble installing driver 26.6.2. In fact, this patch is coming from the recently released hotfix, so it is not new if you are already running version 26.6.3. The second fix is for RX 7000 owners. AMD recently brought FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen graphics cards, but there was a bug with certain games crashing when using FSR 4.1. I experienced this issue with Forza Horizon 6, so today's driver should take care of that. Here is the official changelog: Intermittent install issue seen when installing AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.2 on Windows® 10 systems for Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Intermittent application crash may be observed in some games with AMD FSR Upscaling 4.1 enabled on Radeon™ RX 7000 series graphics products. Known issues include the following: Intermittent application crash or driver timeout may be observed while playing Battlefield™ 6 on AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. AMD is actively working on a resolution with the developer to be released as soon as possible. Texture flickering or corruption may appear while playing Battlefield™ 6 with AMD Record and Stream on some AMD graphics products. AMD FSR Upscaling and AMD FSR Frame Generation may show as inactive in AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition while playing Battlefield™ 6 when enabled on Radeon™ RX 9000 series graphics products. Failure to install may be observed while installing AI Bundle components in some regions with limited access to HuggingFace and GitHub. Model flickering or rendering failure may be observed in Maxon Cinema 4D and Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. Intermittent application crash may be observed on some models while running Blender on Radeon™ RX 7000 series and above graphics products. Users experiencing this issue are recommended to install AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.3.1. You can download the AMD Radeon driver 26.6.4 from the official website here. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • Amazon may use OpenAI and Nova models after Anthropic reportedly raises costs by Karthik Mudaliar Amazon is reportedly considering to use OpenAI models and even its own Nova family of AI models after Anthropic raised the cost of using Claude inside Amazon services. According to a report from The Information, Amazon is weighing its options to reduce costs under a new arrangement with Anthropic. But back in April, Amazon said it would invest $5 billion more in Anthropic, with the possibility of adding up to another $20 billion if certain commercial milestones are met. That investment actually came on top of another $8 billion Amazon had already put into the Claude maker. Anthropic, meanwhile, committed to spend more than $100 billion over 10 years on AWS technologies, including Amazon’s Trainium chips. Amazon isn't just a customer of Anthropic but also one of the most important backers and cloud partners. This is why it makes it interesting that Amazon is considering other alternatives to handle its internal workloads. Although Amazon has been building its own options for a while now. Its Nova family of AI models was announced in late 2024 for Amazon Bedrock, with models aimed at text, image, and video tasks. Amazon pitched the model around cost and latency at that time. With that said, OpenAI has also become a more realistic option recently for AWS customers as well as for Amazon itself. Earlier this year, OpenAI brought its latest models and Codex coding agent to Amazon Bedrock, after changes to its previously more restrictive Microsoft cloud arrangement. This allowed AWS to serve even those customers who wanted other alternatives from Claude, without having to move workloads out of Amazon's cloud. Evaluating alternatives could also be due to commercial pressure and not necessarily a sign of a damaged partnership between Amazon and Anthropic. Whether or not Amazon is actually considering switching entirely to OpenAI's models or its own Nova models remains unknown at this moment.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      61
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!