[NHL] Forsberg finally traded...


Recommended Posts

to the Nashville Predators!!

Sources tell TSN the Nashville Predators have agreed to trade Scottie Upshall, Ryan Parent, a first round pick and a third round pick to the Philadelphia Flyers for Peter Forsbeg.

It is important to note that while the two teams may have agreed on the players involved, the deal is not official until it is approved by the league via a trade call involving both teams and NHL Central Registry. Sources say that call has not been completed, so it is premature to say that the deal has been finalized, only that it has been tentatively agreed to by both teams and it is expected.

Forsberg was on the ice for warm-ups for Thursday's game against the Toronto Maple Leafs, but he was scratched from the lineup.

In 40 games with the Flyers this season Forsberg has 11 goals and 29 assists. He is also leads the Flyers with a +2 plus/minus rating.

Forsberg has missed 16 games with a variety of injuries this season including a concussion, an injured groin and a sore back.

Source: http://tsn.ca/nhl/news_story/?ID=196374&hubname=

There you have it! Big Big Trade :|

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/539234-nhl-forsberg-finally-traded/
Share on other sites

Only a moron like Gary Bettman would award a franchise to Nashville, apparently Nashville owners are too blame for this stupid divisional teams playing eachother for 80% of the season..

As a canucks fan i'm not concerned over Forsberg return to the west, unless of course he went back to Colorado, or if Joe Sakic gets traded to Nashville. :no:

Yeah i would not like to be in Manny Legace's skates right now...

I wonder what the other top teams in the west are going to do now with regards to trades. They will have to find someway of beefing up their roster to compete with Nashville now.

wow. Sullivan. Karyia. Forsberg. :|

David Legwand too. There is some discussion that Forsberg could play LW rather than his traditional Centre role.

Way too much to pay, IMO

Well, it's a win now approach. If Nashville wins the Stanley Cup then it was worth it and if they don't then it wasn't.

They managed to get a premiere player without touching their active roster. Whatshisface #1 Scottie Upshall was a former 1st rounder (6th overall, I believe) whose value had faded significantly. He is now projected to be a checking line player and not a top 6 guy. The other guy Ryan Parent is a solid blue chip defensive prospect but Nashville already has two young defensemen (Shea Webber and someone else Franson) and a third guy Klein in the system somewhere. Nashville's 1st round pick will probably be so late that it could almost be considered a 2nd round pick and the 3rd round pick is conditional somehow on something.

Sorry, lots of vague references there because I can't be bothered to reference it properly. That's the gist of it however. It seems like a good deal to me. It does give Nashville a legitimate shot to put them over the hump and win it all. Of course, Forsberg needs to stay healthy but he has shown that he can take off large gaps in time and still be effective. He missed one regular season completely and came back to lead the playoffs. 27 points in 20 playoff games as I recall.

Then again, it could all be for nothing. You can't blame them for not trying however. It is a decidedly nonconservative move from a traditionally conservative team.

Edited by Fred Derf
updated using the names provided by bayrider
Way too much to pay, IMO

Not really.

If Forsberg re-signs, I think it will be a win-win. Why?

1. Scottie Upshall: The guy was a first round pick, but hasn't amounted to anything more than a 1/2 point per game player tops. With Upshall gone, this also opens up a roster spot for Alex Radulov to play a more important role on the top 2 or 3 lines.

2. Ryan Parent: He's touted to be a pretty good defenseman but he's no Jack or Erik Johnson. To add to that, Nashville has so many D prospects right now that are doing really well, losing Parent is no big loss. Zidlicky, TImmonen, Weber, Suter, Vishnevsky and Franson & Klein in the minors. Nashville is stacked on defensive prospects

3. Nashville's 1st round pick: Nashville will probably be picking 29th or 30th in this year's draft, so it's not like they're giving up a high draft pick, even if it's a 1st rounder. Also keep in mind that this year's draft is a relatively weak one. Don't expect to see many players in this year's draft amount to much.

4 Nashville's 3rd Round Pick: no big deal!

If Forsberg can bring Nashville the Cup, or go very deep in the playoffs, I'd say it's worth it. In perspective, Nashville isn't giving up much.

Not really.

If Forsberg re-signs, I think it will be a win-win. Why?

1. Scottie Upshall: The guy was a first round pick, but hasn't amounted to anything more than a 1/2 point per game player tops. With Upshall gone, this also opens up a roster spot for Alex Radulov to play a more important role on the top 2 or 3 lines.

2. Ryan Parent: He's touted to be a pretty good defenseman but he's no Jack or Erik Johnson. To add to that, Nashville has so many D prospects right now that are doing really well, losing Parent is no big loss. Zidlicky, TImmonen, Weber, Suter, Vishnevsky and Franson & Klein in the minors. Nashville is stacked on defensive prospects

3. Nashville's 1st round pick: Nashville will probably be picking 29th or 30th in this year's draft, so it's not like they're giving up a high draft pick, even if it's a 1st rounder. Also keep in mind that this year's draft is a relatively weak one. Don't expect to see many players in this year's draft amount to much.

4 Nashville's 3rd Round Pick: no big deal!

If Forsberg can bring Nashville the Cup, or go very deep in the playoffs, I'd say it's worth it. In perspective, Nashville isn't giving up much.

I highly doubt Forsberg will resign, which is the problem. I would not give up two high draft picks and two players you're pretty high on (Nashville is high on those players, make no mistake) for an injury-prone rent-a-player.

I highly doubt Forsberg will resign, which is the problem. I would not give up two high draft picks and two players you're pretty high on (Nashville is high on those players, make no mistake) for an injury-prone rent-a-player.

The draft picks are not high. Nashville will probably pick 29th or 30th in the 1st round. Unlike the NFL, a 1st rounder isn't guaranteed to amount to much, and most analysts are saying that this years draft is exceptionally weak aside from the top 5-10. So giving up a very late first rounder, in a very weak draft isn't much. And a 3rd rounder in the NHL is virtually a crap shoot to even make the lineup.

Upshall hasn't proven his 1st round worth and Nashville couldn't care less because Upshall gone, this leaves room for the highly touted Radulov to play a more important role on the team. The kid has 11 goals (23poitns) in 40 games playing on the bottom line with Nashville's worst players. This guy scored 152pts in the minors in 62 games.

As for Parent, like I said, it was a sacrifice Nashville could make because they're so loaded with defensive prospects and rookies its not even funny. Not too many teams could give up a prospect like Parent, who is not touted to be anywhere near as good as Marc Staal or Luc Bourdon.

Bayrider: 1st and 3rd round picks are high, regardless of where they are in the round -- that was what I meant. I wasn't referring to their specific place, just the round they're in.

And I'm not sure what you're smoking... Parent is 19 years old. He's Crosby's age. That's what you guys don't seem to comprehend. He has plenty of time to grow and mature. He and Upshall were both first-round picks, so Nashville is essentially trading away three 1st rounders and a 3rd rounder for Forsberg, who likely won't play there next season.

Upshall is still a work-in-progress, most definitely. But the Predators were trying to finally work him into their roster -- something they haven't been able to do. I'm not sure why you think this makes Radulov (who is definitely a great prospect) get a ton of playing room, since Upshall only played in 14 games this season. He wasn't getting played regularly, and they were waiting to integrate him into their system.

Forsberg will be gone unless the Predators win the Cup this season. Mark my words. And even if they win, I don't think that's a lock for him coming back -- it could increase his value depending on how he does in the playoffs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
    • Save 74% on this Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle by Steven Parker Today on offer via our Online Courses section of the Neowin Deals store, you can save 74% on the Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle. This comprehensive 2026 CompTIA training bundle is created for aspiring IT professionals who want a faster, clearer way to earn multiple industry-recognized certifications while building practical, job-ready skills. Designed around real-world expectations, the curriculum guides you from foundational IT concepts to hands-on technical mastery across A+, Network+, Security+, Cloud+, Server+, and Pentest+ domains. You'll develop the confidence to troubleshoot systems, secure networks, manage cloud and on-prem environments, and tackle complex technical challenges with a methodical approach that employers value. By focusing on practical application and exam-aligned content, this bundle helps you stand out in the job market, prove your capabilities, and prepare for roles such as IT technician, network specialist, cybersecurity analyst, and system administrator with clarity and confidence. Certificate of Completion only. You will not receive official CompTIA certificates upon completion of each course. It's only designed to help you prepare for the covered certification exams. You need to take and pass the exams to get certified. Courses included in this bundle A Plus Certification - CompTIA A+ 220-1202 Training Master hardware, software, networking, and security essentials Covers the full Core 1 & Core 2 scope with inclusive materials that reflect real-world IT work CompTIA Cloud+ (CV0-004) Comprehensive pathway to mastering essential cloud concepts & acing the certification exam Practical skills in cloud architecture, security, and DevOps CompTIA Network+ (N10-009) Training Course Design, configure, manage & secure modern networks Covers OSI & DoD models, IP addressing, subnetting, routing technologies, VLANs, wireless networking, structured cabling, and robust disaster recovery planning CompTIA Server+ (SK0-005) Master server management, administration, and security Practical skills for server hardware installation, disaster recovery & enhancing data security CompTIA Pentest+ Course (PT0-003) Gain demonstrable capabilities in penetration testing, security testing & risk assessment Hands-on pentest labs online and real-world deliverables CompTIA Security+ Certification Course (SY0-071) Essential skills in security concepts, threats & risk management Compliance considerations & authentication mechanisms, with a practical lens to implement them in real-world networks CompTIA Cybersecurity Analyst CySA+ (CS0-004) Hands-on experience in threat modeling, vulnerability assessment & incident response Effective security measures that protect networks & data Tangible outcomes you'll achieve Validated hands-on skills across operating systems, networks, cloud, and security Confidence to pass multiple certification exams on or before your target dates A versatile toolkit for diagnosing, securing, and optimizing IT environments Ability to communicate technical concepts clearly to both technical and non-technical stakeholders Who is this course for Aspiring IT technicians and support professionals who want a clear, practical pathway to multiple industry‑recognized CompTIA certifications IT learners looking to build real‑world skills in hardware, networking, cloud, security, servers, and penetration testing Those aiming to qualify for roles like help desk technician, junior network engineer, system administrator, security analyst, or cloud administrator by earning key certificates efficiently About Vision Training Systems Since 2012 and more than 100,000 students, Vision Training Systems has been delivering expertly crafted online IT training courses to help you earn industry-recognized certifications like CompTIA A+, Network+, Security+, Cisco CCNA, Project Management, CEH V13, Microsoft Azure, AWS, and more. Plus dive into the world of AI, IT Leadership, and core soft skills needed to excel in an IT Career. Whether you’re launching your IT career or looking to grow into a senior role, our flexible, on-demand platform empowers you with the skills and certifications employers demand. Good to know Length of access: lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop or mobile Maximum number of device(s): 1 Available to BOTH new and existing users Certificate of Completion ONLY Experience level required: all levels Closed captioning NOT available NOT downloadable for offline viewing Here's the deal The Complete 2026 CompTIA Certification Training Bundle normally costs $199, but you can pick it up for just $40, that's a saving of $159. For terms, specs and license info, click the link below. Deal Price $40.00 with code SAVE20 (was $199) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • AMD RX 9070 GRE AI, Blender benchmarks vs 9070 XT, 7800XT, Nvidia RTX 5070, 4070 by Sayan Sen Earlier this week, we shared the first part of our review of AMD's new RX 9070 GRE. It was about the gaming performance of the GPU, and we gave it an 8 out of 10. As a follow-up, similar to how we did with the 9070 XT and non-XT, we are doing a dedicated productivity review for the RX 9070 GRE as well, where we compare it against the 9070 XT, 9070, 7800 XT, as well as Nvidia's 5070 and 4070. This will include AI, rendering, compute, and more benchmarks. AI performance, especially, is a very important metric in today's world, and AMD also promised big improvements thanks to its underlying architectural improvements. We will be pitching it against the data we already have for the RX 9070, and RX 9070 XT, but also the Nvidia 5070 FE, MSI GeForce RTX 4070 VENTUS 2X 12G, and Gigabyte Radeon RX 7800 XT GAMING OC 16G as they are in a similar price class, but also because we do not have a comparable 5060 Ti card lying around here that we can compare it against. Before we get underway, this is a collaboration between Sayan Sen and Steven Parker, who lent me his test bed. Also, there was no editorial input from AMD. First up, the specs of the RX 9070, 9070 XT, and 9070 GRE, which were given to us by AMD: Radeon RX 9070 GRE Radeon RX 9070 Radeon RX 9070 XT Boost Clock: Game Clock: up to 2.79GHz up to 2.20GHz up to 2.52GHz up to 2.07GHz up to 2.97GHz up to 2.40GHz Stream Processors 3,072 (48 CU) 3,584 (56 CU) 4,096 (64 CU) Ray Accelerator 48 56 64 AI Accelerator 96 112 128 ROPs 96 128 Texture Mapping Units 192 224 256 Memory 12 GB GDDR6, 18Gbps Clock, 192-bit Bus 432 GB/s 16 GB GDDR6, 20Gbps Clock, 256-bit Bus Effective Memory Bandwidth: 640 GB/s Infinity Cache 48 MB (3rd Gen) 64 MB (3rd Gen) Card Bus PCI-E 5.0 X16 Output 2x HDMI 2.1b 2x DisplayPort 2.1a Power consumption 220W 304W Recommended PSU 650W 750W Slot width 2x 3x Price (SEP) $549 $599 As you can see from the specs above, it is less than the standard RX 9070 in every way that counts, except for slightly higher Boost and Game clock speed. Design Moving on, the RX 9070 GRE we were given is an XFX Swift triple-fan, dual-slot design with two 8-pin connectors. At 30cm (self-measured), it will fit in most systems easily. There is no RGB either. The AMD Radeon RX 9070 GRE by XFX from all angles. Test system Our test system consists of the following: Lian Li O11 Dynamic Mini V2 Flow (Amazon|Newegg) ASUS Z890 ProArt Creator WiFi (Amazon|Newegg) Intel Core Ultra 7 270K Plus (Amazon|Newegg) Thermal Grizzly KryoSheet - 44x37 (Amazon|Newegg) 2x 16GB G.Skill Trident Z5 RGB (7200 MT/s in XMP) (Amazon|Newegg) Sabrent Rocket4 Plus 2TB SSD (Amazon) Windows 11 25H2 (Build 26200.8246) AMD shared a press driver based on the recently released Adrenaline 26.5.2 that we were required to use. We now move on to our benchmarks. First up, we have Geekbench AI running on ONNX. For some reason, the 9070 GRE does exceptionally well here in both half-precision (FP16) and single-precision (FP32). It manages to beat the RTX 5070 and RX 9070 non-XT, and is only behind the 9070 XT. Since Geekbench runs in short bursts instead of continuously hammering the graphics card, it seems the GRE's faster boost clocks are helping here. Next up, we move to the UL Procyon AI test suite, starting with the image generation benchmark. We chose the Stable Diffusion XL FP16 test since it is the most intense workload available on Procyon. The Nvidia cards do very well here, as even the 4070 out-muscles AMD's best fairy easily. The positive thing about the GRE is that it gets quite close to the 9070 non-XT in this test; this indicates that the VRAM does not play a very big role here, as SD XL relies on float16 (FP16). So this is something to keep in mind again. If you wish to work with float32 AI workloads, graphics cards with larger than 12 GB buffers would likely emerge as victors. Regardless, the gains are still massive on AMD's 9000 series compared to the 7000 series. Following image generation, we move to the text generation benchmark. This is one test where the 9070 GRE struggled, quite a lot. It seems that the 12 GB VRAM and lower memory bandwidth of the new Radeon 9070 GRE are hurting it quite a bit; the split is massive, especially in a test like Llama2, which packs 13 billion parameters. As such, in all the tests, the 9070 GRE is the slowest of the lot. Next, we tried Blender, and here the AMD GPUs were beaten by Nvidia. Rendering is something the Green team has always had a lead over the Red side, and it has not changed so far. On the positive side, though, the 9070 GRE shows significantly better results than the 7800 XT, which means AMD is on the right path. Catching up to Nvidia, though, will require a lot more effort. And we hope HIP and ROCm can keep improving. Wrapping up AI testing, we measured OpenCL throughput in the Geekbench compute benchmark. The RX 9070 GRE alongside the 9070 did not fare well here at all, even falling behind the 7800 XT. Interestingly, even the RTX 5070 could not beat the 4070 on OpenCL, so perhaps this suggests that OpenCL optimization may not have been a priority for either AMD or Nvidia in the modern era. Conclusion We reached the end of our productivity performance review of the 9070 GRE, and we have to say it's a mixed bag. Unlike the 9070 and 9070 XT, the GRE excels in some areas while losing ground fairly easily in others. Similar to how it happened in gaming, any time the card's memory subsystem gets hammered, it tends to fall behind the others. This was the case with text generation, wherein we saw the VRAM sometimes hit its maximum available 12 GB of usage with larger model sizes. So what do we make of the RX 9070 as a productivity hardware? It can certainly be used, but you have to know it has its limitations. For those looking for a GPU that can deal with more, AMD recently unveiled the Radeon AI PRO R9700, which is essentially a 32 GB refresh of the 9070 XT with some additional workstation-based optimizations. On a similar note, the new Ryzen AI Halo platform is something you can consider if you want to set up a local AI processing station. Considering everything, we rate AMD's Radeon RX 9070 GRE a 7.5 out of 10 for its productivity performance. Price is less of a factor for those looking at productivity cases compared to those considering the GPU for gaming, and as such, we felt it did quite decently on many occasions and can be handy if you need a 12 GB GPU and, for some reason, don't want to get Nvidia. Purchase links: RX 9070 / XT / GRE (Amazon US) As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!