Does Windows Vista Aero look like Mac OS X Aqua to you?


Recommended Posts

You do realize that Spotlight is just a lame copy of Windows Desktop Search, right? And that WDS shipped before Spotlight, right?

All Apple did was move the search box from the taskbar to the top-right of the screen. And now in Leopard they're playing catch-up again by adding features that Vista / WDS already has.

As much as I don't like getting involved in this kind of stuff...this one I have to correct...

LAME COPY?!

You realize spot light is integrated on the kernel layer of the operating system while WDS is on the application layer? When I used WDS, it first took like 4 hours to index my 500GB HD, and than every time I add a new file, index, index, index some more which mind you ate up CPU and HD cycles...lame copy? Much more the other way around...Apple is really not playing catch up. Anything Vista search can do spotlight can. I mean meta data, tags i"m not sure what you meant by "catch up"...and plus we have been using it since 2005...

I agree about the dashboard stuff though :p

oh and I'm not sure if you got your facts correct, Expose was introduced in 10.3 which released in 2004. I don't think flip 3D was around back than. I beat tested Vista since longhorn, I can't remember exactly but I'm pretty sure flip 3D wasn't around back than...

Edited by NeoXY
yea, the mac fanboys are pretty ridiculous to purport that this this looks like their horrid OS..

nah, Vista does not look like OSX.. as Vista actually looks pretty (at least compared to OSX)

I agree, the only nice thing about OSX is how the buttons look in the graphite skin, otherwise it's interface is quite unnapealing

As much as I don't like getting involved in this kind of stuff...this one I have to correct...

LAME COPY?!

You realize spot light is integrated on the kernel layer of the operating system while WDS is on the application layer? When I used WDS, it first took like 4 hours to index my 500GB HD, and than every time I add a new file, index, index, index some more which mind you ate up CPU and HD cycles...lame copy? Much more the other way around...Apple is really not playing catch up. Anything Vista search can do spotlight can. I mean meta data, tags i"m not sure what you meant by "catch up"...and plus we have been using it since 2005...

LOL

1) No part of Spotlight is implemented in the kernel. That wouldn't even make sense.

2) Spotlight is extremely limited in its capabilities. It has no ability to crawl non-file items (like e-mail databases, for example).

3) WDS is a Windows system service, and is just as integrated with the OS as Spotlight (if not moreso).

4 hours to index 500GB of data (especially large files with lots of content to index) isn't bad at all. Spotlight would certainly take far longer. Of course, spotlight doesn't give you any indication of how much has been indexed, so you kind of have to guess at that.

Every single new feature that Apple is adding to Spotlight in Leopard is already availabe on Vista. How is that not playing catch-up?

oh and I'm not sure if you got your facts correct, Expose was introduced in 10.3 which released in 2004. I don't think flip 3D was around back than. I beat tested Vista since longhorn, I can't remember exactly but I'm pretty sure flip 3D wasn't around back than...

I'm pretty sure an early version of Flip3D was present in the very first Longhorn 3xxx alpha builds (there were videos and screenshots of that ages ago).

Nope. doesn't look like MacOS. Anyway, I hadn't heard that exactly. What I have eard is that Vista "stole" features from MacOS, but then I think, hey, can't a mayor software company like MS put an integrated search, or a 3D chess game in their OS without things being said about them?

Cause in that case, how about Leopard Spaces? (I think that's how they're called...) aren't they a Gnome idea (many desktops)? Is Apple a thief for implementing it on it's next OS? Nope. But what about if MS had done it on Vista (which by the way would have been great :) )... would they be thiefs to the public eye? Probably yes. There's just to many people out there that like to make unimportant things huge.

My personal opinion is that this Aero thing looks neat, and the WPF that's under it is awsome!

LOL

1) No part of Spotlight is implemented in the kernel. That wouldn't even make sense.

2) Spotlight is extremely limited in its capabilities. It has no ability to crawl non-file items (like e-mail databases, for example).

3) WDS is a Windows system service, and is just as integrated with the OS as Spotlight (if not moreso).

4 hours to index 500GB of data (especially large files with lots of content to index) isn't bad at all. Spotlight would certainly take far longer. Of course, spotlight doesn't give you any indication of how much has been indexed, so you kind of have to guess at that.

Every single new feature that Apple is adding to Spotlight in Leopard is already availabe on Vista. How is that not playing catch-up?

I'm pretty sure an early version of Flip3D was present in the very first Longhorn 3xxx alpha builds (there were videos and screenshots of that ages ago).

Wrong on all 3 (or 4) counts

I suggest you go and do a little research

http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/MacOSX_Spotlight_TB.pdf

and if you used spotlight, you'd know that it instantly index and update to any change you have on your operating system while WDS only index ever 20 minutes? (oh...I should mention the WDS I am talking about is the one for windows. Because obviously when we used spotlight, XP users only had the XP version of WDS available...)

and oh...if you can find a screen shot of Flip3D being implemented in Alpha 3XXX...feel free to post a link?

Edited by NeoXY
Wrong on all 3 (or 4) counts

I suggest you go and do a little research

http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/MacOSX_Spotlight_TB.pdf

and if you used spotlight, you'd know that it instantly index and update to any change you have on your operating system while WDS only index ever 20 minutes? (oh...I should mention the WDS I am talking about is the one for windows. Because obviously when we used spotlight, XP users only had the XP version of WDS available...)

and oh...if you can find a screen shot of Flip3D being implemented in Alpha 3XXX...feel free to post a link?

Are you sure ? one of the reasons address book in OSX generatex file based contact information is because spotlight can't index it's binary DB. So Brandon is right there. It might be because apple wanted to keep it simple or whatever the reason.

And WDS on my XP workstation is way faster than spotlight on my iBook G4. So it's just a matter of right hardware. It can be set to index in real time as well. (index now in WDS/XP, haven't used vista yet).

I don't remember reading about Flip3D in Longhorn days.

But care to comment on the "quick views" feature in Leopard which looks like a "straight copy" from Vista (live previews) ? or would you now say it's pretty obvious that showing file thumbnails is trivial. It's funny how this MS copied apple crap flows only one way. What about time machine ? The rumored black interface ?

yea, the mac fanboys are pretty ridiculous to purport that this this looks like their horrid OS..

nah, Vista does not look like OSX.. as Vista actually looks pretty (at least compared to OSX)

I guess that the type of comment that come from Vista/Microsoft fanboys now ain't it?

Besides, if anything, Apple beat at Microsoft in the game of who develops and releases the fastest. Even if Microsoft may have hinted that some of Vista's features originated by in early longhorn releases notes or whatnot, MSFT were beaten as far as speed goes from a company that is a fraction of its size with a much tighter budget.

Wrong on all 3 (or 4) counts

I suggest you go and do a little research

http://images.apple.com/macosx/pdf/MacOSX_Spotlight_TB.pdf

and if you used spotlight, you'd know that it instantly index and update to any change you have on your operating system while WDS only index ever 20 minutes? (oh...I should mention the WDS I am talking about is the one for windows. Because obviously when we used spotlight, XP users only had the XP version of WDS available...)

I've used Spotlight on my MacBook. I know it pretty well. Once it's up-to-date, it indexes based on filesystem notifications just like WDS used to. WDS 3.x actually uses a better mechanism as it's integrated with the USN Change Journal in NTFS. And WDS has never, ever indexed on a 20 minute timer. WDS has always indexed immediately, but it "backs off" while you're using the computer.

I should know. I'm a developer on WDS.

On XP you can turn off that back-off functionality so that it's always completely up-to-date instantly. On Vista, the back-off works differently as it's more closely integrated with the filesystem, and it should always be up-to-date.

and oh...if you can find a screen shot of Flip3D being implemented in Alpha 3XXX...feel free to post a link?

Earliest screenshot I found was from 4074, but I think 3718 might have had it as well (could be wrong, it was a long time ago).

post-30311-1172132567_thumb.jpg

I don't think they look similar at all.

And Spotlight does work as a service, but it's triggered by the kernel (any file I/O triggers it, Time Machine uses the same mechanism)

Edit: another source says it's triggered by the file system driver, so who knows.

Edit 2: yet another source says it uses a thing called "fsevents", it's triggered by the kernel, and app's can use it to detect changes, so that settles it.

Edited by The_Decryptor

Not at all the same. Not even close.

There is just one thing that does annoy me in Vista. The progress bars. They are :x too bright too flourescent. :ermm:

Brandon, is it possible that those terrible flouro progress bars can be changed by Microsoft? Please? Or can they be made customizable? Please?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally launches WSL Containers in public preview by David Uzondu Microsoft has announced that WSL containers, a feature that allows developers to run Linux containers natively inside Windows without the need for Docker Desktop, is now available in public preview several weeks after Microsoft previewed it at Build 2026. To use the new container feature, you first have to install the latest pre-release version of the Windows Subsystem for Linux by running a quick update command in your terminal: wsl --update --pre-release After installing, you'd get access to the new Linux container CLI (wslc.exe) and the programmable API. Microsoft said that the CLI has a "familiar format" that matches the toolsets developers already use every day. If you know standard Docker commands, your muscle memory will translate directly to wslc.exe, which even features a built-in alias called container.exe. You can quickly run a full Ubuntu KDE desktop container by exposing ports, or pass your graphics card straight into a machine learning environment to run PyTorch workloads. Passing the --gpus all flag inside the run command instantly links your hardware. Image via Microsoft As for the API, developers can now embed Linux container operations directly inside native Windows applications without exposing the command line to users. The team integrated the API directly into MSBuild and CMake, so developers can define container steps directly in project files. Apart from bringing the CLI and API into public preview, Microsoft also said that it's working on a new default file system called virtiofs to speed up file transfer rates between Windows and Linux. Microsoft also introduced an experimental networking mode named consomme, which resolves compatibility issues with corporate VPNs by routing Linux network traffic straight through Windows. One thing to note about WSL containers is that they don't run in your standard WSL distributions; instead, every application and CLI session spawns its own lightweight Hyper-V utility VM in the background. This basically reduces the chances of one app snooping on the container of another app.
    • Google reportedly limited Meta's Gemini access over limited AI compute by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly limiting Meta's use of its Gemini AI models after Meta tried buying more computing capacity than even Google could supply. According to the Financial Times, Google told Meta in March that it could not provide the full Gemini capacity that Meta had requested. This shortfall even disrupted and delayed some of Meta's internal projects. Due to this, Meta even told its employees internally to use AI tokens more efficiently. Meta wasn't the only one to get hit by this sudden refusal by Google; even other customers were affected. But Meta was hit harder because of its unusually high demand for Google's models. The move from Google makes it evident that companies all over are in limited supply of both infrastructure and compute. Alphabet said in April that Google Cloud revenue grew 63% year-over-year to $20 billion in the first quarter, helped by enterprise AI infrastructure and AI solutions. In pursuit of more compute, Meta had earlier signed a multi-billion-dollar AWS agreement as well as a large AMD GPU deal for AI data centers. But the crunch would be short-lived as both Meta and Google have also ramped up infrastructure investments heavily. Meta said in November that it was committing more than $600 billion in the U.S. by 2028 for AI technology, infrastructure, and workforce expansion. In the first quarter of this year, Meta also raised its expected capital expenditure for 2026 to a range of $125 billion to $145 billion, citing higher component pricing and additional data center costs for future capacity. However, this doesn't make the company immune to the current dependence on outside suppliers. Meta has also spent many years promoting Llama as an open-weight alternative to closed models from Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic. But if the reported reliance on Google's Gemini models is severe enough for internal work to get impacted, then it looks like even frontier labs and Big Tech aren't fully self-sufficient. Source: Financial Times
    • I like to reminisce about the good old days, way back in autumn 2025 when building a gaming machine was fun and the drives were about $150 when you caught a deal. Yes duh, back in the day we had it gone. Then baby Skynet came along, hiding in AI datacenters demanding more processing power until it reached singularity. End of a not totally fictional story.
    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!