Recommended Posts

I think we need to claify things for all you customizing noobs out there.  Completed Visual Styles are .msstyles.  These are for StyleXP (if you use the program) OR the uxtheme.dll that you d/led from the SAME company that makes StyleXP (TGT Soft).  It is the same thing, except that one is a program...all the program does is manage themes and hack the uxtheme.dll for use of themes.

Better?

Ok, well just color me a noob. I understand now. Sorry for the brain fart. LOL

Thanks for the clarification!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/54071-vs-k10k-20/page/3/#findComment-546752
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

is there any chance someone here could send me or fix the link to this because i cant seem to find k10k 2.0 anywhere? thanks in advance

forgot to say: killer style and ive been using it a while, too bad its not one those things one thinks to back up when they format

Edited by nohoy
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/54071-vs-k10k-20/page/3/#findComment-710760
Share on other sites

looks awfully similar to tcport :blink:

that was my fault, At that time I didnt know how to make the thin taskbar so I asked permission to the tcport author to let me use his theme as a base, but it seems that I didnt change the quicklaunch effects :no:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/54071-vs-k10k-20/page/3/#findComment-726069
Share on other sites

My sappy rendition of a k10k v2...

Features:

- Classic thin taskbar

- Start button from earlier version

- All small fonts again

- Modified start panel

- Old tray chevron image

- Old dot style separator for tray

- Shellstyle from earlier version

- Removed k10k branding (personal preference)

- Old style taskbar buttons trimmed in size

I just wanted to show that k10k is still a damn good theme and should be given more attention.

post-36-1049074656.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/54071-vs-k10k-20/page/3/#findComment-726927
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!