Recommended Posts

How ridiculous is it that Apple expect people to wait for them to finish itunes before upgrading to vista? Unbelievably!

Apple has had plenty of time to upgrade itunes. On a side note, so did nvidia (my 7800gtx gfx card) and creative (my xfi xtrememusic soundcard).

As frustrating as it is, I believe Apple are the worst of the lot. They said they would release an updated itunes more than 2 weeks ago. They haven't. I still can't update my ipod video and various other tasks for the past 2 months.

In my opinion, I think that Apple is purposely doing this just to get people fed up with windows. If this is true, and I insist that this is only my opinion, it is the most childish and unprofessional thing to do. What company tells its users not to upgrade to a major new operating system because of a media player? Yes, you heard me, Apple to Windows iTunes users: Don't install Vista yet. That is utterly laughable.

As for my experience with Apple, I like their system, and can use it very well. I set my grandparents up with a Mac for its ease of you. Unmatched GUI and excellent usability. But I personally am a windows person and nothing will change that.

In conclusion, Steve Jobs, please be friendlier to windows users. I purchased your product. I use your program. Support your immediate family as much as your distant cousins.

Chris.

Edit: Itunes released 6 March 2007

Edited by skase
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/543033-wheres-itunes-for-vista/
Share on other sites

What's utterly laughable is how terrible iTunes always looks when running on Windows. You think they'd put a small amount of effort into making it look remotely like it belongs in Windows, especially on Vista (Where it looks even worse :(, where there are tons of options available thanks to Aero glass)

How ridiculous is it that Apple expect people to wait for them to finish itunes before upgrading to vista? Unbelievably!

Apple has had plenty of time to upgrade itunes. On a side note, so did nvidia (my 7800gtx gfx card) and creative (my xfi xtrememusic soundcard).

As frustrating as it is, I believe Apple are the worst of the lot. They said they would release an updated itunes more than 2 weeks ago. They haven't. I still can't update my ipod video and various other tasks for the past 2 months.

In my opinion, I think that Apple is purposely doing this just to get people fed up with windows. If this is true, and I insist that this is only my opinion, it is the most childish and unprofessional thing to do. What company tells its users not to upgrade to a major new operating system because of a media player? Yes, you heard me, Apple to Windows iTunes users: Don't install Vista yet. That is utterly laughable.

As for my experience with Apple, I like their system, and can use it very well. I set my grandparents up with a Mac for its ease of you. Unmatched GUI and excellent usability. But I personally am a windows person and nothing will change that.

In conclusion, Steve Jobs, please be friendlier to windows users. I purchased your product. I use your program. Support your immediate family as much as your distant cousins.

Chris.

I was frustrated using iTunes when I got my ipod video over a year ago... but soon got a software called Anapod. I just plug in my ipod and drag and drop songs/videos right into the player... no "synchronizing" or duplicate copy of songs on my computer just for the itunes software. Also, I can install anapod on any computer quickly and share my music without it getting wiped out :D.

One of the few softwares that I personally think was worth every penny.

I had a client who had a bad case of virus and had system wiped. So reinstall OS, and itune.. updated itunes and firmware on ipod... then (I think this is a result of updated firmware because past firmware updates didn't do this)... firmware update went ok... but itunes gave no option to keeps songs on the ipod and wiped the songs on it. That just sucks big time. Customer needed to rip all the cd's over again! :(

How ridiculous is it that Apple expect people to wait for them to finish itunes before upgrading to vista? Unbelievably!

Apple has had plenty of time to upgrade itunes. On a side note, so did nvidia (my 7800gtx gfx card) and creative (my xfi xtrememusic soundcard).

As frustrating as it is, I believe Apple are the worst of the lot. They said they would release an updated itunes more than 2 weeks ago. They haven't. I still can't update my ipod video and various other tasks for the past 2 months.

In my opinion, I think that Apple is purposely doing this just to get people fed up with windows. If this is true, and I insist that this is only my opinion, it is the most childish and unprofessional thing to do. What company tells its users not to upgrade to a major new operating system because of a media player? Yes, you heard me, Apple to Windows iTunes users: Don't install Vista yet. That is utterly laughable.

As for my experience with Apple, I like their system, and can use it very well. I set my grandparents up with a Mac for its ease of you. Unmatched GUI and excellent usability. But I personally am a windows person and nothing will change that.

In conclusion, Steve Jobs, please be friendlier to windows users. I purchased your product. I use your program. Support your immediate family as much as your distant cousins.

Chris.

Hey guess what, Apple owes you NOTHING in this regard. When you buy an iPod, NOWHERE does it say "Compatible with Vista". YOU chose to upgrade knowing that iTunes/iPods wouldn't work.

Apple is not required to update iTunes to work with Vista. It makes smart business sense to, but by no means do they have to. In reality it's almost the same as Vista. Companies paid their employees to write drivers/software for a certain OS/OSes. TONS of products didn't (and some still don't) support XP when it first came out. GIVE IT TIME. Unless someone held a gun to your head and said they'd shoot you unless you upgraded to Vista, there is absolutely no reason why you NEED Vista. Want maybe, but need, no.

And you're wondering how ridiculous it is for Apple to say you should wait to upgrade? If you ABSOLUTELY, HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE need to use iTunes and update your iPod, then yes, you should wait. It's ridiculous of you to expect Apple to spend time and money updating a product to work on a new, recently released rival OS when it's not even marketed as working on Vista.

So chill the f' out.

By installing it? Works fine for me.

Yep. No problems here regarding functionality. I very rarely get an all black iTunes gui, but minimizing/maximizing corrects it. This has happened twice since my Home Premium install Feb 6th. Otherwise, it's just as reliable as it was on XP for me.

Hey guess what, Apple owes you NOTHING in this regard. When you buy an iPod, NOWHERE does it say "Compatible with Vista". YOU chose to upgrade knowing that iTunes/iPods wouldn't work.

Apple is not required to update iTunes to work with Vista. It makes smart business sense to, but by no means do they have to. In reality it's almost the same as Vista. Companies paid their employees to write drivers/software for a certain OS/OSes. TONS of products didn't (and some still don't) support XP when it first came out. GIVE IT TIME. Unless someone held a gun to your head and said they'd shoot you unless you upgraded to Vista, there is absolutely no reason why you NEED Vista. Want maybe, but need, no.

And you're wondering how ridiculous it is for Apple to say you should wait to upgrade? If you ABSOLUTELY, HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE need to use iTunes and update your iPod, then yes, you should wait. It's ridiculous of you to expect Apple to spend time and money updating a product to work on a new, recently released rival OS when it's not even marketed as working on Vista.

So chill the f' out.

That is the most ignorant response ever. If every company had a "I'll do it later" approach of things, it would be an utter catastrophe. If I purchase their product, and they know in 3 months that a certain percentage of their customers might be upgrading their OS. They should work to make sure there product works with it. It’s called customer satisfaction. It is bad for the brand.

In theory, no one should have to wait. I paid the company money, I expect it to work with anything mainstream. It shouldn't have to be marketed to work with vista since it is marketed to work with WINDOWS. Since beta, its more than 6 months old. The betas are released to allow companies to use and test their product.

On another note, my podcasts corrupt when I download them. That is something I need itunes for. Otherwise, anapod is an excellent program.

That is the most ignorant response ever. If every company had a "I'll do it later" approach of things, it would be an utter catastrophe. If I purchase their product, and they know in 3 months that a certain percentage of their customers might be upgrading their OS. They should work to make sure there product works with it. It?s callecustomer satisfaction.b> It is bad for the brand.

In theory, no one should have to wait. I paid the company money, I expect it to work with anything mainstream. It shouldn't have to be marketed to work with vista since it is marketed to work with WINDOWS. Since beta, its more than 6 months old. The betas are released to allow companies to use and test their product.

On another note, my podcasts corrupt when I download them. That is something I need itunes for. Otherwise, anapod is an excellent program.

I'll admit I am somewhat an Apple fanboy though I don't own a single Apple computer yet. Just an iPod video. I am quite disappointed with Apple's support of Vista. Apple doesn't owe us anything for support of Vista. But lets face it Microsoft will be forcing Vista on the PC users.

The altitude of I'll wait seems evident in allot of hardware Vendors. I mention Logitech. I can't emphasize enough my frustration with their Vista support. Their aditude was to wait till the final. Well now here is the final and their drivers as much as they work consume allot of memory and are somewhat buggy.

I believe it would be in the best interest for Apple to get iTunes Vista compatibility out as soon as they can. Or at least update their consumers to why there is a delay instead of stating to hold off upgrading to Vista.

Thats just my opinion.

Craig Hindall

Indianapolis, Indiana USA

That is the most ignorant response ever. If every company had a "I'll do it later" approach of things, it would be an utter catastrophe. If I purchase their product, and they know in 3 months that a certain percentage of their customers might be upgrading their OS. They should work to make sure there product works with it. It’s called customer satisfaction. It is bad for the brand.

In theory, no one should have to wait. I paid the company money, I expect it to work with anything mainstream. It shouldn't have to be marketed to work with vista since it is marketed to work with WINDOWS. Since beta, its more than 6 months old. The betas are released to allow companies to use and test their product.

On another note, my podcasts corrupt when I download them. That is something I need itunes for. Otherwise, anapod is an excellent program.

i completely agree with this post. let's at least look at this from several different vantage points:

1. apple decides not to update itunes at vista launch to undermine microsoft.

- this point makes a whole lot of sense because i had it in my head that this was the reason itunes 7.0.3 was not released. how many companies had vista ready products at launch? more than a few and most don't have the resources apple has to put out a simple update. flat out telling customers not to upgrade to a new operating system because you can't either meet a deadline or have the smarts enough to provide an update puts apple in a negative light. it's been long enough, put out the update. even now companies are rushing to get vista drivers/programs out the door. why? this is my next point.

2. apple is only screwing themselves.

- 65%. that's how much pc sales have increased since vista came out. of that market share, how many own an iPod or even bought one after they got their new pre-loaded vista computer? this only serves to slow down the sales of iPod's due to the fact that iTunes is the default program that makes it work. you need iTunes to not only transfer songs but to also update your iPod software. not being able to use the program needed for this will make people shy away from the iPod and possibly look somewhere else like the Zune.

3. not everyone is like us.

- we're a niche market, folks. we know what we're doing (most of the time) and we know what to get. this is why we're employed with either our families or in the work force as IT professionals. our side accounts for a small percentage of the massive pie that is the computer world. what we know, the family next door has no clue of. now, get those people who don't understand things to see how their newly bought iPod and software do not work correctly in vista and you've got a consumer problem. apple gets a bad name faster than microsoft does (because, in all reality, 90% of the programs work flawlessly in vista but why can't iTunes?) and sales suffer. in this respect, apple does owe a working and quality product. just as much as people say that microsoft owes it to us to provide a working OS, apple owes it to people who purchased an iPod a quality and working software program. i mean, doesn't apple market iTunes and iPod as holding hands running in a field together?

in essence, apple's flat out refusal at this point to provide nothing but a hotfix (which people have to actually research for) is a sham. vista came out, apple knew how much of a beast iPod's are for the pc market, and put a little FU in billy gates punch. too bad it's going to backfire on them.

Since Vista has been out for a while, my only conclusion is that Apple did it on purpose... but what for? Will be a mixed bag of results. Maybe a chance that people will be more encouraged to get a Leopard OS mac? Maybe a holdup because they want the iphone to work with itunes as soon as the new itunes will release?

Then again... what took nVidia soooo long?

Edited by nevets

At lease Nvidia and Creative have some "beta" releases. No such luck from Apple.

I had a hard time getting my newly bought iPod Nano to work with Vista. It was only after dual booting with XP and turning Disk Mode support on in my iPod Nano that I managed to make it work with Vista. (Not using iTunes now, I'm using Winamp.)

Oh, and I suspect iTunes messed up my drivers for Vista because I started to get driver requests for my HDDs after installing iTunes. So naturally, I did a reformat.

How ridiculous is it that Apple expect people to wait for them to finish itunes before upgrading to vista? Unbelievably!

Apple has had plenty of time to upgrade itunes. On a side note, so did nvidia (my 7800gtx gfx card) and creative (my xfi xtrememusic soundcard).

As frustrating as it is, I believe Apple are the worst of the lot. They said they would release an updated itunes more than 2 weeks ago. They haven't. I still can't update my ipod video and various other tasks for the past 2 months.

In my opinion, I think that Apple is purposely doing this just to get people fed up with windows. If this is true, and I insist that this is only my opinion, it is the most childish and unprofessional thing to do. What company tells its users not to upgrade to a major new operating system because of a media player? Yes, you heard me, Apple to Windows iTunes users: Don't install Vista yet. That is utterly laughable.

As for my experience with Apple, I like their system, and can use it very well. I set my grandparents up with a Mac for its ease of you. Unmatched GUI and excellent usability. But I personally am a windows person and nothing will change that.

In conclusion, Steve Jobs, please be friendlier to windows users. I purchased your product. I use your program. Support your immediate family as much as your distant cousins.

Chris.

:pinch: You should be laughing at yourself for not thinking to actually CHECK to see if all the latest software and drivers that you REQUIRE are even released, before you upgraded to an OS that has only JUST been released.

Why laugh at Apple? They can't just stop what they're doing and stop at nothing to get iTunes running on Vista for you, you'll have to wait. It's funny, coz Apple have all these people buying legal music off iTunes in the palm of their hands. What are you people gonna do? Change player? Your music won't work. And if you don't legally buy music, then you CAN just switch player for the time being. :p So just wait and stop whining.

Since Vista has been out for a while, my only conclusion is that Apple did it on purpose

Glad to see you were at that board meeting with the itunes dev team.

I missed it because I had a lunch appointment with Mike Eisner and you know how testy he can be when you cancel. :rolleyes:

:pinch: You should be laughing at yourself for not thinking to actually CHECK to see if all the latest software and drivers that you REQUIRE are even released, before you upgraded to an OS that has only JUST been released.

Why laugh at Apple? They can't just stop what they're doing and stop at nothing to get iTunes running on Vista for you, you'll have to wait. It's funny, coz Apple have all these people buying legal music off iTunes in the palm of their hands. What are you people gonna do? Change player? Your music won't work. And if you don't legally buy music, then you CAN just switch player for the time being. :p So just wait and stop whining.

I believe we should at least have a right to know what is going on. I mean we paid good money for their products!

Here:

http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=305042

Seems like a fair and thoughtful response to me . . . you're asked for a little bit of patience, is all.

I especially like this little bit:

Upgrading to Windows Vista

If you are upgrading from Windows XP or 2000 to Windows Vista prior to the next release of iTunes, here are a few steps that will improve your experience when syncing your iPod or playing iTunes Store purchases once upgraded to Windows Vista.

Deauthorize all iTunes Store accounts.

Enable Disk Use on all iPod models.

Uninstall iTunes.

Perform a clean install of Windows Vista (Highly recommended but not required).

Reinstall the latest version of iTunes.

Open iTunes.

Choose Authorize Computer from the Store menu in iTunes.

Customers who have upgraded to Windows Vista and are still experiencing issues playing iTunes Store purchases should download and run the iTunes Repair Tool for Vista after re-installing iTunes 7.0.2. Click here for more information about this tool.

I meant the status on the development on a Windows Vista compatible versions. And I had problem enabling Disk Use on iPods - iTunes and Windows, for that matter, could not even detect the iPod. I get some wizard asking for drivers.

(Fixed it with dual-booting with Windows XP though.)

i completely agree with this post. let's at least look at this from several different vantage points:

1. apple decides not to update itunes at vista launch to undermine microsoft.

- this point makes a whole lot of sense because i had it in my head that this was the reason itunes 7.0.3 was not released. how many companies had vista ready products at launch? more than a few and most don't have the resources apple has to put out a simple update. flat out telling customers not to upgrade to a new operating system because you can't either meet a deadline or have the smarts enough to provide an update puts apple in a negative light. it's been long enough, put out the update. even now companies are rushing to get vista drivers/programs out the door. why? this is my next point.

2. apple is only screwing themselves.

- 65%. that's how much pc sales have increased since vista came out. of that market share, how many own an iPod or even bought one after they got their new pre-loaded vista computer? this only serves to slow down the sales of iPod's due to the fact that iTunes is the default program that makes it work. you need iTunes to not only transfer songs but to also update your iPod software. not being able to use the program needed for this will make people shy away from the iPod and possibly look somewhere else like the Zune.

3. not everyone is like us.

- we're a niche market, folks. we know what we're doing (most of the time) and we know what to get. this is why we're employed with either our families or in the work force as IT professionals. our side accounts for a small percentage of the massive pie that is the computer world. what we know, the family next door has no clue of. now, get those people who don't understand things to see how their newly bought iPod and software do not work correctly in vista and you've got a consumer problem. apple gets a bad name faster than microsoft does (because, in all reality, 90% of the programs work flawlessly in vista but why can't iTunes?) and sales suffer. in this respect, apple does owe a working and quality product. just as much as people say that microsoft owes it to us to provide a working OS, apple owes it to people who purchased an iPod a quality and working software program. i mean, doesn't apple market iTunes and iPod as holding hands running in a field together?

in essence, apple's flat out refusal at this point to provide nothing but a hotfix (which people have to actually research for) is a sham. vista came out, apple knew how much of a beast iPod's are for the pc market, and put a little FU in billy gates punch. too bad it's going to backfire on them.

Thanks Salterbomb, you summed it up perfectly.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Tixati 3.43 by Razvan Serea Tixati is a free and easy to use BitTorrent client featuring detailed views of all seed, peer, and file transfer properties. Also included are powerful bandwidth charting and throttling capabilities, and a full DHT implementation. Tixati is one of the most advanced and flexible BitTorrent clients available. And unlike many other clients, Tixati contains NO SPYWARE, NO ADS, and NO GIMMICKS. Tixati portable version is meant to run on a USB flash drive or other portable media. It stores all its configuration files in the same folder as the executable binary files, and all file paths are stored in a format relative to the program executable folder. It is important you do not delete the "tixati_portable_mode.txt" file within the executables folder. This file is what triggers Tixati to run in portable mode. (The executable binaries are actually the same as the standard edition binaries.) When running the portable edition from a USB flash drive, especially one that is formatted in FAT16/FAT32, you may experience some lag when initially loading a new transfer. This is because initializing and allocating large files on flash-based media consumes a greater amount of time and resources compared to a conventional hard-drive. Tixati has the following features: detailed views of all aspects of the swarm, including peers, pieces, files, and trackers support for magnet links, so no need to download .torrent files if a simple magnet-link is available super-efficient peer choking/unchoking algorithms ensure the fastest downloads peer connection encryption for added security full DHT (Distributed Hash Table) implementation for trackerless torrents, including detailed message traffic graphs and customizable event logging advanced bandwidth charting of overall traffic and per-transfer traffic, with separate classification of protocol and file bytes, and with separate classification of outbound traffic for trading and seeding highly flexible bandwidth throttling, including trading/seeding proportion adjustment and adjustable priority for individual transfers and peers bitfield graphs that show the completeness of all downloaded files, what pieces other peers have available, and the health of the overall swarm customizable event logging for each download, and individual event logs for all peers within the swarm expert local file management functions which allow you to move files to a different partition even while downloading is still in progress 100% compatible with the BitTorrent protocol Windows and Linux-GTK native versions available Tixati 3.43 changelog: Several major DHT improvements Added several screening heuristics to filter malicious DHT nodes, prevent Sybil floods Rewrote DHT search algorithms to add support for multi-path lookups Improved DHT logging, more details in several error messages Extended timeout lengths for outgoing queries over I2P Added incoming query / response per second to DHT table status display Updated Regex engine to PCRE2 Faster Search function, scans channel user profiles in much less time Fixed problems with file name parsing and date handling in RSS Faster and more accurate RSS filtering and episode number detection Several optimizations to global text processing functions, such as UTF-8 cleaning, line splitting, and token parsing Complete update of port-mapping UPNP/NAT-PMP engine, added PCP support, mapping over VPN support, and more Several refinements to default gateway detection on Windows / Android, which is used for port-mapping Support for IPv6 interface-scoped addresses, which is sometimes needed for IPv6 gateway detection and port mapping Full support for PCP port remapping, added backup zero-port query in case requested port is rejected New UPNP/NAT-PMP Monitor in Help > Diagnostics New reflected local port/location tracker that analyzes DHT replies to detect true port/location and NAT mapping type New TCP/UDP Ports monitor in Help > Diagnostics, with several statistic and information tabs, and a detailed event log Calculated/reflected local port is now used for port parameter in tracker queries and peer handshake Fixed several problems with Linux Wayland compatibility Completely replaced tray icon functions in Linux, new SNI implementation is now the default with GSI backup Implemented full DBus-Menu server to be used by new SNI tray icon implementation Replaced Linux tray balloon notification DBus client Rewrote auto-shutdown DBus interface for Linux Rewrote sleep inhibit DBus interface for Linux Dropped deprecated Linux dbus-glib dependencies Completely new Windows asynchronous file handling, now using IOCP model with several block-alignment optimizations Better handling of system network resets and interface down/up cycles Added option to fully clear configuration in Settings > Import/Export Remember last option checkboxes when using Import/Export Fixed minor I2P incoming connection routing problems Much faster I2P vanity host name finder Much faster channel user vanity key finder Raised length limit for torrent tracker remote failure messages to 120 from 64 Fixed problems setting download location on a torrent before the meta info is resolved Added location/MOC paths to category pane tooltips Several minor Web Interface fixes Refinements to static and scrolling ellipsizing layout routines Several fixes and improvements to single and multi-line text edit controls Many other minor fixes throughout the user interface A major overhaul of the Android framework has also been done: API target raised to 35, page alignment set to 16K Rewrote all inset processing routines Full rewrite of foreground service, application, and main activity objects New permission request routines Added multi-cast lock request before UPNP/LPDP discovery operations Fixed file permission and locking problems when loading .torrent from web browsers Fixed problems with Z-ordering of modal / non-modal and popup windows Fixed handling of back gesture on newer OS Added status bar icon adjustment based on status bar background color Added option in Settings > UI > Behavior to continue running in tray when task removed from recents App can be closed by swiping away notification Rewrote IME interface, fixed several problems with auto-correct, on-screen keyboard visibility, and cursor positioning Added full support for Android hardware mouse and keyboard function Added full tooltip implementation for Android hovering via mouse or other cursor device Full rewrite of popup menu widgets to better support hardware pointers and keyboard Added mouse cursor updating framework for Android hovering Added Settings > Import/Export to Android builds Added language file support to Android builds Download: Tixati 64-bit | Tixati 32-bit ~20.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Portable Tixati 3.43 | 114.0 MB Download: Tixati 3.43 for Linux | Android View: Tixati Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Firefox 152.0.1 by Razvan Serea Firefox is a fast, full-featured Web browser. It offers great security, privacy, and protection against viruses, spyware, malware, and it can also easily block pop-up windows. The key features that have made Firefox so popular are the simple and effective UI, browser speed and strong security capabilities. Firefox has complete features for browsing the Internet. It is very reliable and flexible due to its implemented security features, along with customization options. Firefox includes pop-up blocking, tab-browsing, integrated Google search, simplified privacy controls, a streamlined browser window that shows you more of the page than any other browser and a number of additional features that work with you to help you get the most out of your time online. Firefox key features Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) – Blocks trackers, cookies, cryptominers, and fingerprinters by default. Private Browsing Mode – Deletes history, cookies, and temporary files when closed. Lightweight & Fast Performance – Optimized memory usage with efficient page loading. Cross-Platform Sync – Sync bookmarks, passwords, history, and open tabs across devices. Customizable Interface – Toolbars, themes, and extensions can be tailored to user needs. Strong Privacy Controls – Options to manage cookies, permissions, and site data easily. Reader Mode – Strips away clutter for distraction-free reading. Pocket Integration – Save and read articles offline with Pocket built into Firefox. Picture-in-Picture (PiP) – Watch videos in a floating window while multitasking. Extensions & Add-ons – Vast library for productivity, security, and personalization. Built-in PDF Viewer – No need for external software to view PDFs. Firefox Monitor – Alerts users if their email is part of a known data breach. Multi-Account Containers – Isolate browsing sessions (e.g., work, personal, shopping). Performance & Resource Efficiency – Uses fewer system resources than some competitors. Open Source & Community-Driven – Transparent development with global contributions. Firefox 152.0.1 fixes: Fixed frequent crashes affecting users with Intel Raptor Lake processors. (Bug 2039575) Fixed an issue on macOS where choosing a PDF option, such as "Save as PDF", from the system print dialog would send the job to your printer instead of saving a file. (Bug 2047850) Download: Firefox 64-bit | Firefox 32-bit | ARM64 | ~70.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Firefox for MacOS | 146.0 MB View: Firefox Home Page | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      81
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!