Recommended Posts

I compared the memory usage of Firefox with Opera by opening the same websites for both. Interestingly Firefox memory usage is at least 50% more than that of Opera. Is there a memory manager for Firefox?

--------------------

Free Software Downloads

Email Notifier with auto-login for Gmail/Yahoo/Hotmail

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/548584-is-firefox-resource-hungry/
Share on other sites

The "memory leak" of Firefox is a feature. It's the way that Firefox caches pages. Opera is able to do the same caching as Firefox with much less memory. I don't know why this is, but yeah... Firefox is a bit of a hog when it comes to resource usage.

The "memory leak" of Firefox is a feature. It's the way that Firefox caches pages. Opera is able to do the same caching as Firefox with much less memory. I don't know why this is, but yeah... Firefox is a bit of a hog when it comes to resource usage.

Hahaha. Ever thought of becoming a politician?

Yes it's resources hungry, no it's not "faster" than Opera....

Theres no memory leak but some extensions may have memory leaks, the cache feature use lot of RAM sure, you can disable it but it may slow down browsing speeds.

I just close Firefox from time to time. I've had Firefox jump up above 200MB's before. Right now it's sitting at just under 90MBs.

Firefox is more unstable than any Internet Explorer version I've ever used though. The good thing is it can restore your session if you've written a nice long post right before it crashes. ;)

"The 'memory leak' of Firefox is a feature."

"Yes it's resources hungry...."

"Firefox retains memory it's not using as kinda a cache, which isn't a bad thing (speeds it up)"

At what point does someone realize the hypocracy of what one says? Vista uses memory and it's a bad thing.

How can one promote the excess memory usage of a program yet condemn memory usage of an OS?

I agree with linx05. Firefox promoters may do well as politicians.

I'd rather the OS use all the memory, i want it 100% used all the time, no hypocrisy on my part.

And the large memory usage isn't a leak, if it was a leak Firefox wouldn't be able to free it (i can get Firefox down to 6MB of memory usage, if the 150MB or so of memory usage was a leak that wouldn't be possible)

I'd rather the OS use all the memory, i want it 100% used all the time, no hypocrisy on my part.

I want mine to use a little as possible so that very resource intensive applications can start up and run faster/better without having to put all the contents from the RAM to the HDD (taking up time in the process).

Well, i didn't exactly mean that, although it sure sounds like it in hindsight.

At the moment i have around 500MB of my ram not being used, but it's also showing a bit of pagefile usage, why is it even using the pagefile at all if i have half my physical memory unused?

Yes it does use up resources it even makes my UI lag if i move a window "OVER" firefox then it like lags behind the window if you know what i mean like i move it it lags behind a little bit. but not over firefox then it doesn't and i multitask ALOT!

I got 1.00GB Ram, 3.06Ghz HT P4, 5200 GFX Card.

April 9th im ordering a Dual Core 2 Duo 3.0ghz, 7900 GFX Nvidia Card, 2.00GB Ram, its time i upgraded seen as my pc graphics, the processor is getting on abit now and i had my pc for quite a while now.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!