Recommended Posts

A demilitarized zone (DMZ) is when you instruct the router to allow ALL incoming traffic to your machine. This is obviously dangerous, and should be only used in an extreme situation.

and as others here have said, its definetly some other software blocking it, disable your 3rd party firewall and windows firewall and then try.

And as I've already stated, I can log on to my computer through the LogMeIn service. So some ports must be forwarding properly...right?
NO! This is not how the logme in service works.. Your computer is making a connection to them.. To connect to your system from the internet - you go to the logme network - and go thru the connection your machine made outbound..

This is how they get past corp firewalls, and allow people too stupid to setup a simple forward, or know what their Public IP is to connect to their machines.. Its VNC for IDIOTS if you ask me ;) hehehe

? for you -- do you have another machine on your network, a friends laptop, something that you can plug into the same router an try to access whatever services your trying to use.. ie Remote Desktop, etc.

Since you state you have NO other devices.. Did you check your routers internet IP.. is it public? Your not using a Proxy.. How do you know what your public IP is.. to try an connect to your services from outside? Its quite possible if using a proxy that if you go to somewhere like canyouseeme.org that it could be seeing your proxies IP.

I would assume by going to IP Chicken that they provide me with my public IP. Is this what you're talking about, or is there another public IP that you're speaking of.

I am not using a proxy.

And no, "Public LAN" is not enabled on my router, and I don't think it's suppose to be.

I do want to correct myself, there is one other computer connected wirelessly to my router. I will take your advice and attempt to forward ports on that machine and see if I can RD to it.

Do you receive a login screen at all when you connect to the remote machine?

Last time I checked, it was required that the account you're attempting to login to on the remote machine must have a password...

I'd recommend trying hamachi too... works wonders for me.

Nope, no login screen.

Yes, I have a password.

The topic of this thread probably needs to be changed, because until I can properly forward port 3389, I won't be able to RD. :-(

Go to:

http://www.portforward.com/english/routers...nk327Windex.htm

You will see "Your external IP address is : xx.xx.xxx.xxx"

post-78314-1176342381_thumb.jpg[

That should be your modem's IP address. Now just follow the instructions and you should be all set:

http://www.portforward.com/english/routers...ote_Desktop.htm

Also I recommend DynDNS that was posted before. Help out a lot when your modem's IP address changes.

You do not have to FORWARD anything for the other machine on your network to access your machine.. You state your IP was 192.168.1.47... ok so your other machine is say 192.168.1.48

From this machine can you access your remote desktop to 192.168.1.47??

If NOT -- then you clearly have something blocking it on your machine - or its not even running, etc..

You do not have to FORWARD anything for the other machine on your network to access your machine.. You state your IP was 192.168.1.47... ok so your other machine is say 192.168.1.48

From this machine can you access your remote desktop to 192.168.1.47??

If NOT -- then you clearly have something blocking it on your machine - or its not even running, etc..

Yea it's looking like that's going to have to be the next step. That will at least tell me whether not not it's my router or my machine.

And I have the router firewall disabled as well.

Thank you everyone for your help.

You do not have to FORWARD anything for the other machine on your network to access your machine.. You state your IP was 192.168.1.47... ok so your other machine is say 192.168.1.48

From this machine can you access your remote desktop to 192.168.1.47??

If NOT -- then you clearly have something blocking it on your machine - or its not even running, etc..

I think thats the ip address his router is giving his computer, he needs the ip address of his modem so it can forward it to his computer. The computer he is trying to conntect to at home is not on the same network the computer he is trying to connect from which is at his school. Now if he lived in the dorms like I did then yea he doesnt need to port forward anything.

Doli, did you read what Budman was referring too? He said connect from another machine on his network to verify RDP is working. Start there to see if he can connect, if he can't he has something configured wrong on his computer since this wouldn't be going through any firewalls. If he is able to connect but not from a remote computer at school, then

1) His port forwarding on router is not configured correctly

2) He's using the wrong ip (www.whatismyip.com

3) School's firewall is blocking outgoing ports - i know we block outgoing ports also except 443 and 80 and restrict port 21 to specific PC's who need it.

Doli, did you read what Budman was referring too? He said connect from another machine on his network to verify RDP is working. Start there to see if he can connect, if he can't he has something configured wrong on his computer since this wouldn't be going through any firewalls. If he is able to connect but not from a remote computer at school, then

1) His port forwarding on router is not configured correctly

2) He's using the wrong ip (www.whatismyip.com

3) School's firewall is blocking outgoing ports - i know we block outgoing ports also except 443 and 80 and restrict port 21 to specific PC's who need it.

Ok, did'nt catch that and its a good idea if he has another computer on that network :blush:

If the ports are blocked is there a way to change the Remote Desktop listing port number to 443?

Edited by Doli

I know you said you already use LogMeIn - as do I, why do you think its funky? aside from the free version not offering file transfers (this limitation can be overcome by Hamachi) I have always found Windows RDC to be slow, unresponsive and it randomly doesn't work, just like you are experiencing now.

As for LogMeIn, I have yet to have a single problem with it. I find it to be very fast, reliable and I know someone said it was VNC for dummies - well I guess you better call me a dummie...

Personally I like programs that JUST WORK, with no mucking about, no settings to have to 'manually configure' or that require me to open ports (and thus create a potential security risk for my PC).

LogMeIn (paired with Hamachi for file transfer) is absolutely the way to go - what about it doent you like?

Also you need to look at what you actually want to do, do you want complete control over your computer ot just access to files?

Perhaps there is a solution that doesn't involve LogMeIn or the (crappy)Windows RDC??

Dan

I know you said you already use LogMeIn - as do I, why do you think its funky? aside from the free version not offering file transfers (this limitation can be overcome by Hamachi) I have always found Windows RDC to be slow, unresponsive and it randomly doesn't work, just like you are experiencing now.

As for LogMeIn, I have yet to have a single problem with it. I find it to be very fast, reliable and I know someone said it was VNC for dummies - well I guess you better call me a dummie...

Personally I like programs that JUST WORK, with no mucking about, no settings to have to 'manually configure' or that require me to open ports (and thus create a potential security risk for my PC).

LogMeIn (paired with Hamachi for file transfer) is absolutely the way to go - what about it doent you like?

Also you need to look at what you actually want to do, do you want complete control over your computer ot just access to files?

Perhaps there is a solution that doesn't involve LogMeIn or the (crappy)Windows RDC??

Dan

Eh. It doesn't bug me too much. What does bug me is when websites like canyouseeme.org say that my F***ING ports aren't opened. I'd AT LEAST like my uTorrent port to be open so I can get better download speeds. But thank you for your input. :cool:

So have you tried to connect to from the other machine yet?? What that would take like 3 seconds to check out!

As to the person suggesting you change the port remote desktop listens on.. There is NO need to do that, unless his router does not support changing the port at the nat.. Most any decent one would..

I for example I forward port 21 on the outside of my router to my slingbox 5001.. since work has port 21 open outbound for ftp.

Lets not worry about the schools firewall just yet.. Since that has little to do with what canyouseeme.org says from his house..

Since he states it use to work.. Then either his forwards are not right -- ie forwarding to 192.168.1.46 when his address is 47, etc.. which is quite possible and would explain everything he has mentioned.. Use to work - just stopped, etc.. Or he has a software firewall running on his machine.

Its not rocket science.. its a few simple settings... Or maybe his ISP is blocking all inbound ports? Again this would explain his probelm.

Thanks for following up on this BudMan. Sorry I just got home from work and had been testing my router settings using LogMeIn =P.

I attempted to check canyouseeme.org on my mom's pc, and it also came up saying the ports were not open. So it's not my computer.

I'm going to contact Verizon tomorrow and see what the deal is. There's no reason my router would crap out only regarding port forwarding, no way.

Thanks for following up on this BudMan. Sorry I just got home from work and had been testing my router settings using LogMeIn =P.

I attempted to check canyouseeme.org on my mom's pc, and it also came up saying the ports were not open. So it's not my computer.

I'm going to contact Verizon tomorrow and see what the deal is. There's no reason my router would crap out only regarding port forwarding, no way.

he was telling you to try to do a remote desktop connection between your machine at home and another on the same network as your machine at home (like your mom's). This is a quick, sure-fire way to see if it's the router having a port issue (or the ISP being dumb) or if it's a problem with your computer.

Going to canyouseeme.org from ANY computer on your network will give the exact same results, so it's a worthless test in that regard (heck, I don't even like that test for anything)

I attempted to check canyouseeme.org on my mom's pc, and it also came up saying the ports were not open. So it's not my computer.
And did you change all the forwards on your router to forward to your mom's PC? Does your mom's machine have these services running that your trying to forward to her machine? Remote Desktop? p2p, what??

Please Post the screen shots from your router of your port forwards.. From your statement you tested from your moms computer, I get the funny feeling you do not understand how a port forwards works. Or your forgetting to post info, ie like how you changed the forwards on your router to point to your moms IP before you checked with canyouseeme.org

How does that check rule out a software firewall?? Even if you made the changes on your router? Your mom could have one as well..

This type of issue comes up A LOT around here, here Let me dig up one of the past threads where I walked a person thru doing a TEST of a port forward.

Here you go

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?show...;hl=portforward

Post number #15 walks you thru testing a port forward with just simple telnet..

Please post the results of doing this test! And screen shots of the forward screens from your router.

edit: Not 100 sure on that thread what the users issue was, but since he left his router wide up to remote admin with the default password.. I was able to get onto his router.. And I could not ping his machine from the roueter - so seemed quite clear his machine was running a software firewall!

Edited by BudMan

HOLY **** OMG WTF......FINALLY!

I referred to that other post you had a link to. Figured it had to be some service running on my system.

Went through every service listed in administrative tools. First I went through the things that were stopped, to see if there was some service I needed to start. No luck. Then I went through the started services, and when I got to "Cisco Systems, Inc. VPN Service", I looked at the details and hit the "Dependencies" tab, and saw that it depended on "TCP/IP Protocol Driver" and "IPSEC Driver" (which I had read earlier is some sort of security feature that can block ports). Disabled that bitch and TADAAAA, uTorrent Port Checker gives me that green "OK!" that I had missed oh so dearly.

Thanks so much BudMan, as well as the rest of you.

I had installed my university's VPN client a few weeks ago. If anyone has an explanation as to why this was blocking my ports, please let me know :D.

Well most likely by default when you install the Cisco VPN client it will turn on its Firewall.. Was not the ? "any type" of firewall or security software that might be running on your machine brought up multiple times? ;)

Which is why we called for testing from another machine on your network as well ;)

vs disabling service(s) that will be required for your use your VPN, an that you clearly do not undestand what thy do ;) I would suggest you just turn off the firewall part of your vpn software.

post-14624-1176473925.jpg

post-14624-1176474196.jpg

Which reminds me I should update my client ;) I know 5 is out..

By default as well when your connected to the VPN your machine would not use any other connection other than the VPN, so if your connected to the VPN your port forwards would not work either. Keep that in mind as well, unless of course the forwarded traffic was coming from the VPN connection - unlikely.

This setting to allow for split tunnel type access would be controlled by the VPNC, ie your school would have to set if you can split tunnel or not.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • How can it beat a Steam machine without a serious GPU? The two CU iGPU only provides about 5fps in gaming. That's not going to make any gamer happy.
    • Anthropic introduces Claude Tag, a new AI teammate for Slack by Fiza Ali Anthropic has announced Claude Tag, a new feature that lets teams work with Claude directly inside Slack. The idea is simple: once Claude is added to a Slack workspace and given access to selected channels, users can tag @Claude in conversations and assign tasks. Claude can then work through those requests using connected tools and data sources before posting its results back into a Slack thread. What makes Claude Tag different from a typical chatbot is that it's designed to operate as a shared assistant for an entire team rather than a single user. Everyone in a channel interacts with the same Claude instance. This allows the team members to see ongoing work and continue tasks started by others. Furthermore, Anthropic says the AI can build context over time by following conversations in channels where it has permission to operate. This means users don't have to repeatedly provide the same background information for every request. The system is also designed for asynchronous work. Instead of waiting for responses in a chat window, users can assign a task to Claude and return later once the work is complete. Anthropic says Claude can break larger requests into multiple steps and use connected tools to complete them. Moreover, the system can also schedule follow-up tasks and continue working on projects over extended periods. Another feature allows Claude to keep the users updated and follow up on unresolved tasks when its optional "ambient" mode is enabled. The company says the tool is already being used internally for software development, data analysis, support workflows, and debugging. According to Anthropic, around 65% of its product team's code is now generated through its internal version of Claude Tag. For organisations concerned about security, administrators can control which channels, tools, and data sources Claude can access. Separate Claude instances can also be configured for different departments, helping keep information isolated between teams. Administrators can also monitor activity logs, review completed tasks, and set spending limits at both the organisation and channel level. Claude Tag is now available in beta for Claude Enterprise and Claude Team customers and runs on Claude Opus 4.8 that was announced this May. The feature will also replace Anthropic's existing Claude in Slack application, with current users able to migrate within a 30-day migration window. Lastly, eligible customers will receive introductory credits to help teams evaluate the new experience.
    • Beats Studio Pro wireless over-ear ANC headphones drop to their lowest price yet by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Beats Studio Pro headphones at their all-time low price. The Studio Pro use 40mm active drivers which are designed to improve clarity and reduce distortion compared to previous models, with up to an 80% improvement over the Beats Studio3 Wireless. A built-in digital processor adjusts frequency response to keep the sound balanced rather than overly boosted in any one area. They also include Active Noise Cancelling that adapts to your surroundings to reduce background noise along with a Transparency mode that lets outside sound in when you need awareness of what’s going on around you. Furthermore, the headphones support personalised Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking as well as Dolby Atmos playback on supported content. Moreover, built-in voice-targeting microphones improve call quality. You can also switch between three sound profiles including Beats Signature for balanced music playback, Entertainment for films and gaming, and Conversation for clearer voice in calls and podcasts. Physically, they are designed to be worn for long periods without feeling heavy or awkward. The ear cushions use UltraPlush engineered leather while metal sliders allow you to adjust the fit. On the connectivity side, the Studio Pro use Class 1 Bluetooth for a stable, long-range wireless connection. There is also a 3.5mm input if you want to plug in directly, including use with in-flight entertainment systems. Controls are located on the headphones and include a "b" button for music and call control, a volume rocker, and a multifunction button used for switching listening modes, EQ settings, power, and pairing. In addition, the headphones offer integration with both Apple and Android devices. On Apple devices, they support one-touch pairing with iCloud-linked devices, hands-free Siri access, Find My tracking based on last connected location, and automatic software updates. On Android devices, they support Google Fast Pair, Audio Switch between compatible devices, and Google Find My Device tracking, with additional features available through the Beats app. When it comes to the battery performance, it is rated at up to 40 hours of listening time with ANC turned off, and up to 24 hours with ANC or Transparency mode enabled. A 10-minute Fast Fuel charge should provide up to 4 hours of playback. Finally, the headphones use a rechargeable lithium-ion battery and charge via USB-C. Beats Studio Pro Wireless Over-Ear ANC Headphones: $149.95 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • "lets you pause updates by choosing an end date, for up to 35 days" Wasn't it "indefinitely"?
    • Those extra reboots are related to the UEFI Secure Boot certificate update thing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      460
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      110
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!