Socket AM2 = Socket 940?!?


Recommended Posts

So I'm argueing with a friend of mine. I looked at Wikipedia but can't find that this is right. At the german page of Socket AM2 they say that socket has 940 contacts. Ok so in theory it could be Socket 940?

Is that right or not? I ask this because I'm looking at a CPU Cooler which is for Socket 940 so I don't know if it will fit on my AM2..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553465-socket-am2-socket-940/
Share on other sites

Socket AM2 = Socket 940 is correct.

MD Athlon 64 FX-62 (socket AM2) Specs

Clock Speed 2.8Ghz

L2 Cache 2x1MB

Front Side Bus 2000Mhz

Socket 940 AM2

Architecture 90 nanometers

Dual Core Yes

64 Bit Yes

Additional Technologies HyperTransport™ Technology, AMD Cool‘n’Quiet™ Technology, AMD Virtualization

canadacomputers.com

Mmhhh...now I'm confused. So I couldn't put a CPU made for AM2 in Socket 940. That's ok so far. But my problem now is: I found a Cooler which is listed only for 940. I mean, if the only difference is the pins it should also fit on Socket AM2, because the CPU is on the Socket and the cooler is on top of it.

Socket AM2 has 940 pins, but it is not Socket 940. Pin arrangements are physically different -- just like Socket 479M has 478 pins, but not compatible with Socket 478.

pin arrangement is the same:

Socket AM2! (left) Socket 940! (right)

socketAM2.jpgsocket940_small.JPG

Mmhhh...now I'm confused. So I couldn't put a CPU made for AM2 in Socket 940. That's ok so far. But my problem now is: I found a Cooler which is listed only for 940. I mean, if the only difference is the pins it should also fit on Socket AM2, because the CPU is on the Socket and the cooler is on top of it.

Yes, an AM2 processor won't work in a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa, but as for your cooling, it should work, since both Socket AM2 and Socket 940 BOTH have the same clips

pin arrangement is the same:

Socket AM2! (left) Socket 940! (right)

socketAM2.jpgsocket940_small.JPG

Yes, an AM2 processor won't work in a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa, but as for your cooling, it should work, since both Socket AM2 and Socket 940 BOTH have the same clips

Pin arrangement is not the same at all - look at the bottom left of both sockets. On AM2 the keyed part is 7 pins in from the left. On the 940 socket it is 5 pins in from the left.

Also, you're wrong - the retention mechanism for 940 and AM2 are different. Take a look at this HardOCP page for instance which details the different heatsink mounting:

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA==

939/940 had only two holes for CPU mounting. AM2 has 4 holes.

Are you blind?

ahh.. i didn't see that. i was looking at the heights.

the right side ones are flipped, and the left side ones are on the same row for the AM2

the 940 (right picture) the top right pin is one column to the right of the bottom one, and the left side blanks are a few off from one another.. i didn't see that

Also, you're wrong - the retention mechanism for 940 and AM2 are different. Take a look at this HardOCP page for instance which details the different heatsink mounting:

Depends on what you buy Alphacool NexXxoS supports 754/939/940/FX/Opt./AM2. while the SilverStone Nitrogon supports 478, LGA775, AMD Socket 754, 939, 940

it really depends on what you buy....

Edited by lylesback2

Wow, those hardware guys are some crazy people. Basically my main question is answered, thank you guys. Still I wonder what's going on in their minds when they make so many Sockets, best exampel is Socket 940 and AM2. You really can't tell the difference when you don't look exactly at the pictures...

[edit]Phemo, thanks for confusing me once more!! :))

Alphacool NexXxoS supports 754/939/940/FX/Opt./AM2. while the SilverStone Nitrogon supports 478, LGA775, AMD Socket 754, 939, 940

it really depends on what you buy....

A fair point. My old XP120 will fit on 478, 754/939/940, LGA775 and AM2 boards. It's down to the heatsink but if it doesn't specifically state AM2 I wouldn't take a chance on it due to the 2 and 4 hole differences.

Wow, those hardware guys are some crazy people. Basically my main question is answered, thank you guys. Still I wonder what's going on in their minds when they make so many Sockets, best exampel is Socket 940 and AM2. You really can't tell the difference when you don't look exactly at the pictures...

[edit]Phemo, thanks for confusing me once more!! :))

Yeah, I agree that sometimes it can get confusing. Just to clarify all of the information thus far, Socket AM2 and Socket 940 both have 940 physical pins on the them, but the pin arrangement is different. Therefore, a Socket AM2 processor will not fit into a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa. Also, Socket 940 (along with Socket 754 and Socket 939) and Socket AM2 use different RMs (retention mechanism) for their CPU heatsinks. So once again this means that a CPU heatsink designed for Socket 940/939/754 will not work on a Socket AM2 motherboard, and vice versa.

As for why this happens? A number of reasons, but the biggest of them is cost. Each one of those pins costs AMD money; they felt that having 940-pins was adequate for not only dual-core but also quad-core processors. In AMD's defense, they did try to not confuse potential customers by labeling the new one Socket AM2 (which, by the way, is what you should always refer to it as). However, they could have saved themselves a lot of confusion by just artificially adding one extra pin and calling it Socket 941 or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
    • AT&T has been spying on US citizens with the NSA for decades.. they just know how to keep it more under wraps.. the evil level is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!