Socket AM2 = Socket 940?!?


Recommended Posts

So I'm argueing with a friend of mine. I looked at Wikipedia but can't find that this is right. At the german page of Socket AM2 they say that socket has 940 contacts. Ok so in theory it could be Socket 940?

Is that right or not? I ask this because I'm looking at a CPU Cooler which is for Socket 940 so I don't know if it will fit on my AM2..

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/553465-socket-am2-socket-940/
Share on other sites

Socket AM2 = Socket 940 is correct.

MD Athlon 64 FX-62 (socket AM2) Specs

Clock Speed 2.8Ghz

L2 Cache 2x1MB

Front Side Bus 2000Mhz

Socket 940 AM2

Architecture 90 nanometers

Dual Core Yes

64 Bit Yes

Additional Technologies HyperTransport™ Technology, AMD Cool‘n’Quiet™ Technology, AMD Virtualization

canadacomputers.com

Mmhhh...now I'm confused. So I couldn't put a CPU made for AM2 in Socket 940. That's ok so far. But my problem now is: I found a Cooler which is listed only for 940. I mean, if the only difference is the pins it should also fit on Socket AM2, because the CPU is on the Socket and the cooler is on top of it.

Socket AM2 has 940 pins, but it is not Socket 940. Pin arrangements are physically different -- just like Socket 479M has 478 pins, but not compatible with Socket 478.

pin arrangement is the same:

Socket AM2! (left) Socket 940! (right)

socketAM2.jpgsocket940_small.JPG

Mmhhh...now I'm confused. So I couldn't put a CPU made for AM2 in Socket 940. That's ok so far. But my problem now is: I found a Cooler which is listed only for 940. I mean, if the only difference is the pins it should also fit on Socket AM2, because the CPU is on the Socket and the cooler is on top of it.

Yes, an AM2 processor won't work in a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa, but as for your cooling, it should work, since both Socket AM2 and Socket 940 BOTH have the same clips

pin arrangement is the same:

Socket AM2! (left) Socket 940! (right)

socketAM2.jpgsocket940_small.JPG

Yes, an AM2 processor won't work in a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa, but as for your cooling, it should work, since both Socket AM2 and Socket 940 BOTH have the same clips

Pin arrangement is not the same at all - look at the bottom left of both sockets. On AM2 the keyed part is 7 pins in from the left. On the 940 socket it is 5 pins in from the left.

Also, you're wrong - the retention mechanism for 940 and AM2 are different. Take a look at this HardOCP page for instance which details the different heatsink mounting:

http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article.html...W50aHVzaWFzdA==

939/940 had only two holes for CPU mounting. AM2 has 4 holes.

Are you blind?

ahh.. i didn't see that. i was looking at the heights.

the right side ones are flipped, and the left side ones are on the same row for the AM2

the 940 (right picture) the top right pin is one column to the right of the bottom one, and the left side blanks are a few off from one another.. i didn't see that

Also, you're wrong - the retention mechanism for 940 and AM2 are different. Take a look at this HardOCP page for instance which details the different heatsink mounting:

Depends on what you buy Alphacool NexXxoS supports 754/939/940/FX/Opt./AM2. while the SilverStone Nitrogon supports 478, LGA775, AMD Socket 754, 939, 940

it really depends on what you buy....

Edited by lylesback2

Wow, those hardware guys are some crazy people. Basically my main question is answered, thank you guys. Still I wonder what's going on in their minds when they make so many Sockets, best exampel is Socket 940 and AM2. You really can't tell the difference when you don't look exactly at the pictures...

[edit]Phemo, thanks for confusing me once more!! :))

Alphacool NexXxoS supports 754/939/940/FX/Opt./AM2. while the SilverStone Nitrogon supports 478, LGA775, AMD Socket 754, 939, 940

it really depends on what you buy....

A fair point. My old XP120 will fit on 478, 754/939/940, LGA775 and AM2 boards. It's down to the heatsink but if it doesn't specifically state AM2 I wouldn't take a chance on it due to the 2 and 4 hole differences.

Wow, those hardware guys are some crazy people. Basically my main question is answered, thank you guys. Still I wonder what's going on in their minds when they make so many Sockets, best exampel is Socket 940 and AM2. You really can't tell the difference when you don't look exactly at the pictures...

[edit]Phemo, thanks for confusing me once more!! :))

Yeah, I agree that sometimes it can get confusing. Just to clarify all of the information thus far, Socket AM2 and Socket 940 both have 940 physical pins on the them, but the pin arrangement is different. Therefore, a Socket AM2 processor will not fit into a Socket 940 motherboard, and vice versa. Also, Socket 940 (along with Socket 754 and Socket 939) and Socket AM2 use different RMs (retention mechanism) for their CPU heatsinks. So once again this means that a CPU heatsink designed for Socket 940/939/754 will not work on a Socket AM2 motherboard, and vice versa.

As for why this happens? A number of reasons, but the biggest of them is cost. Each one of those pins costs AMD money; they felt that having 940-pins was adequate for not only dual-core but also quad-core processors. In AMD's defense, they did try to not confuse potential customers by labeling the new one Socket AM2 (which, by the way, is what you should always refer to it as). However, they could have saved themselves a lot of confusion by just artificially adding one extra pin and calling it Socket 941 or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!