Recommended Posts

Hey i feel stupid for asking but here it goes anyway. I downloaded and patched the MMS files. Then i downloaded

http://rapidshare.com/files/26927658/Max_t...lose_Button.rar

and extracted that. Now what do i have to do to use this theme. It's classified as a Windows Visual Style File whereas all my other themes are Windows Theme Files.

btw im using XP home sp2...is my problem i need vista to use this? cause i hate Windows Blinds (aka waste of ram) but i love the themes.

Thanks for any help or suggestions

Edited by Gumbo-
Hey i feel stupid for asking but here it goes anyway. I downloaded and patched the MMS files. Then i downloaded

http://rapidshare.com/files/26927658/Max_t...lose_Button.rar

and extracted that. Now what do i have to do to use this theme. It's classified as a Windows Visual Style File whereas all my other themes are Windows Theme Files.

btw im using XP home sp2...is my problem i need vista to use this? cause i hate Windows Blinds (aka waste of ram) but i love the themes.

Thanks for any help or suggestions

A theme file includes a visual style, colors, desktop background, some icons, etc. They're only distributing the visual style. The theme posted at the very top is a Windowblinds only theme. The one posted later in the thread is a Vista msstyle. XP and Vista msstyles are not compatible with each other.

Also, I should address your misinformation about Windowblinds. WB is by no means a waste of RAM. In fact it has been proven many times that on average, WB uses less RAM than XP's default skinning engine. Also, since WB uses hardware acceleration, (and the default skinning engine doesn't), you can actually expect a better performing system with WB than you will using Windows' default skinning engine. That, and WB is capable of skinning so many more elements of the Windows GUI than the default skinning engine. I recommend that you at least try WB before you spread this misinformation on the board.

I recommend that you at least try WB before you spread this misinformation on the board.

I have used windows blinds numerous times. It could be the trial version of WB or the theme/skin that I was using that caused WB to take up more ram and CPU than my current XP Skinning Engine. I'll have to try the full version and try out other skins to determine whether it was the trial version that was affecting the performance or whether your statement about hardware usage is valid. Thanks for all the advice. I'm not disagreeing, I just want to know your source (and credibility of it) or how you came about this assumption because it differs from my past experiences.

Also by patching my 'uxtheme.dll' files etc. what was that actually doing? I was under the impression that I was overwriting the XP version with the newer Vista files, enabling me to use the Vista msstyles.

Edited by Gumbo-
I have used windows blinds numerous times. It could be the trial version of WB or the theme/skin that I was using that caused WB to take up more ram and CPU than my current XP Skinning Engine. I'll have to try the full version and try out other skins to determine whether it was the trial version that was affecting the performance or whether your statement about hardware usage is valid. Thanks for all the advice. I'm not disagreeing, I just want to know your source (and credibility of it) or how you came about this assumption because it differs from my past experiences.

That's odd. Did you disable the Windows skinning engine, or were you running both the default skinning engine and WB at the same time? This is the most common problem users have concerning system performance.

Also by patching my 'uxtheme.dll' files etc. what was that actually doing? I was under the impression that I was overwriting the XP version with the newer Vista files, enabling me to use the Vista msstyles.

No, not at all. The default uxtheme.dll only allows official Microsoft themes to be used. When you patched your XP uxtheme.dll, you're just giving it the ability to use third-party (unsigned themes).

You can't use Vista msstyles on XP. You can either find an XP msstyle that looks like Vista (no glass or other special features), or you can use WB. Likewise, you can't use XP msstyles on Vista (unless you port them to WB first... which is reasonably easy to do).

Your best bet is to either find an XP msstyle that looks kinda like Vista, or use WB.

This is a very nice looking theme :) can you please add .theme file also please ? as I dont know how to apply it :(

thanks

Sorry guy's I posted the wrong one the other day~ LOL

Here is the correct Max glass, with blue status bars

snap2ao6.jpg

Newdown.gif 1.83 MB RAR

http://rapidshare.com/files/26777018/Aero_Max_Glass-Blue_Status_Bars.rar

There will be now theme files this is a vista style file. If you have vista you must patch your system files, I posted a app to help with that on page 2

Wallpaper "Aurora Blue">>>

http://rapidshare.com/files/28133599/Aurora_Blue_Wall.rar

Hi guy, thanks for link of wallpaper !!!

Brazil in forum !!!

There will be now theme files this is a vista style file. If you have vista you must patch your system files, I posted a app to help with that on page 2

Wallpaper "Aurora Blue">>>

http://rapidshare.com/files/28133599/Aurora_Blue_Wall.rar

My Vista is already patched, but I dont see in ur zip file any .theme file :( where is it ?

thanks :)

My Vista is already patched, but I dont see in ur zip file any .theme file :( where is it ?

thanks :)

you do not need the .theme file.

What's important is the .msstyles file

When you extract to C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\

Extract it to a folder which has the SAME name as the ____.msstyles file.

In your display properties, you will see 2 Windows Aero choices (if you patched it correctly). Choose one of them and apply..If you get the default Vista Aero, try the other one (there's a problem with the names which hasn't been resolved I think)

you do not need the .theme file.

What's important is the .msstyles file

When you extract to C:\Windows\Resources\Themes\

Extract it to a folder which has the SAME name as the ____.msstyles file.

In your display properties, you will see 2 Windows Aero choices (if you patched it correctly). Choose one of them and apply..If you get the default Vista Aero, try the other one (there's a problem with the names which hasn't been resolved I think)

I know that but i would have prefer to have . theme file as i have about 10 themes inside folder and it is painfull to test all to see whihc one is whihc as all have same name in the wondow :s

  • 3 weeks later...
Is it image # 630 you tried to change to fix the windows download page? I ask because I have never used a windows update site? I do see blue when I use windows update, the app. Not green see image here>>>>

snap1ec9.jpg

Here is Max glass blue status bars with the red close button as requested>>>

snap12ky3.jpg

http://rapidshare.com/files/26927658/Max_trans_with_Blue_status_bar_And_Red_Close_Button.rar

could you please make another version with normal trans and without the red close button?

max trans is too much for me :)

Looks like I spoke too soon.

Something is wrong with my system after having used the VistaGlazz.exe. Now, every time I start Firefox or IE7, the computer hangs for about 30 seconds then starts to load a page. When I open a new tab in either Firefox or IE7, the same thing happens - the system just hangs and the HDD light remains on until the new tab is loaded.

It's not the internet connection because my other computer works fine.

So I undid the patches but the problem persists.

I'm dual booting so I booted to Windows XP and the same things happens in XP too!!!!

I have not made any other changes to my system other than applying the VistaGlazz.exe.

How can applying this screw up Vista and XP. I'm suspicious of VistaGlazz having some virus or something.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!