Is it possible to bring back the XP Start Menu in Vista?


Recommended Posts

hem...other than the fact that it puts folder last, and that it sorts everything automatically, I don't quite see the difference in usability. Someone could explain to me what is so dreadful about it?

Agreed those are annoying as especially as the option to stop it from re-ordering menus items alphabetically no longer works (what's the point in the option then?) but to answer your question nothing is wrong with it really it's just the XP one was better. It's too crammed now trying to fit in all the start menus item into that little box.

As to the Search idea IMO it's a rubbish one, if you organise your start menu that is. I only have 7 folders in my Start Menu and 1 of those is Startup. It takes me seconds to find the icon I want instead of messing around typing it in. I doubt I'll ever open something by typing it in.

I am actually surprised that MS didn't do some type of dock (other than the sidebar).

They'd get sued by Apple first and foremost, and from a useability standpoint, I still think a taskbar is more practical. But check out RocketDock and ObjectDock 1.9. Both are built for Vista, and work wonderfully. RocketDock, especially, is light on resources and still packs a lot of nice features.

LMAO ;) Hell, they copied some of OS X anyway. ;) lol

Such as? Much of the technology in Vista, such as Instant Search and Previous Versions, were in fact built by Microsoft as early as 2003. Apple actually copied the technology, renamed them Spotlight and Time Machine, and brought them to market first.

Becuase the new start menu is NOT "change for the better" - it is a horrible system designed to be different for the sake of it. However, the search bar that is now included means that you don't need to use it often - if it wasn't for that there would be a LOT of people complaining. But the point remains that the new start menu is disgusting and I too would prefer the old XP system, even though I would mainly use the search bar.

I disagree with you... I find Vista's start menu to be far better organized and laid out. Having everything in one compact section is the way to go, in my opinion. And, like others have said, the whole point of Vista's start menu is that you don't even need it. You use the Instant Search to find w/e you need. The only time I've found myself going into Vista's actual start menu was to physically add a shortcut in there; otherwise, I've never used it, I have no need for it with Instant Search.

Why would I want to type "Word" when I can click on the frickin' shortcut on the desktop?

Obviously, not everyone will have a shortcut on the desktop. In fact, I strongly dislike desktop icons, I much prefer a dock. To me, desktop icons are just clutter, between Quick Launch and a third party dock, I see no need for having them.

Obviously, not everyone will have a shortcut on the desktop. In fact, I strongly dislike desktop icons, I much prefer a dock. To me, desktop icons are just clutter, between Quick Launch and a third party dock, I see no need for having them.

I'm not a fan of desktop icons either but a Dock kinda annoys me too :/

When it comes to my desktop, I keep icons to a minimal. 10 or less.

3 Quick launch, 10 Static ( I turned off recently opened programs in the XP start menu) icons in start menu. + 10 on the desktop.

My problem with the vista start menu is that when you have a massive amount of apps like I do, Scrolling up/down looking for apps is just irritating at best. It just feels, to me, way to crampt.

Maybe I'm just old fashioned with my Classic Themed, Blue background XP (win 2000) style desktop.

I'm not a fan of desktop icons either but a Dock kinda annoys me too :/

When it comes to my desktop, I keep icons to a minimal. 10 or less.

3 Quick launch, 10 Static ( I turned off recently opened programs in the XP start menu) icons in start menu. + 10 on the desktop.

My problem with the vista start menu is that when you have a massive amount of apps like I do, Scrolling up/down looking for apps is just irritating at best. It just feels, to me, way to crampt.

Maybe I'm just old fashioned with my Classic Themed, Blue background XP (win 2000) style desktop.

But if you have so many apps, why don't you just use Instant Search? Assuming you've more or less kept the default installation options (that is, to Program Files) they should all be properly indexed. If not, you can add more folders to be indexed, so everything is found quicker.

I am actually surprised that MS didn't do some type of dock (other than the sidebar).

What aspect of the Dock did you expect to see? Windows already has the taskbar and quicklaunch, which accomplish the same functionality as the Dock in a much more useful and clear way. The dock mixes functionality and has very inconsistent behavior - why would you ever want that?

Other than the specific UI of the Dock, I don't think Microsoft would have to worry about being sued if they were to implement something more like the Dock. It's not like the Dock originated in OS X, all they did was a take the common dock / wharf idea from various *nix shells and add zooming icons to it.

What aspect of the Dock did you expect to see? Windows already has the taskbar and quicklaunch, which accomplish the same functionality as the Dock in a much more useful and clear way. The dock mixes functionality and has very inconsistent behavior - why would you ever want that?

Other than the specific UI of the Dock, I don't think Microsoft would have to worry about being sued if they were to implement something more like the Dock. It's not like the Dock originated in OS X, all they did was a take the common dock / wharf idea from various *nix shells and add zooming icons to it.

You make good points, but for some people, like myself, having desktop icons, Quick Launch and the standard taskbar make the whole desktop a bit crowded. What I like about the Dock is that everything is in one, compact place. Every minimized window, shortcuts to the most common apps I use, etc. I completely understand the idea behind the taskbar, but for me, I just find that simplicity is the way to go. Of course, everyone has different computing habits. These are mine.

You make good points, but for some people, like myself, having desktop icons, Quick Launch and the standard taskbar make the whole desktop a bit crowded. What I like about the Dock is that everything is in one, compact place. Every minimized window, shortcuts to the most common apps I use, etc. I completely understand the idea behind the taskbar, but for me, I just find that simplicity is the way to go. Of course, everyone has different computing habits. These are mine.

As Slimy said, what's the difference between just using QuickLaunch and keeping your desktop clean? (or using it for something else?)

I don't put shortcuts on my desktop, I just have a taskbar that looks like this:

post-30311-1181079758_thumb.jpg

I don't really see how the Dock is "simpler." In fact, as I said above, I find it much more confusing because running apps are mixed in with quicklaunch-style shortcuts. The only other main difference the Dock has is the large icons / thumbnails of running applications versus the small icon and title bar.

As Slimy said, what's the difference between just using QuickLaunch and keeping your desktop clean? (or using it for something else?)

I don't put shortcuts on my desktop, I just have a taskbar that looks like this:

post-30311-1181079758_thumb.jpg

I don't really see how the Dock is "simpler." In fact, as I said above, I find it much more confusing because running apps are mixed in with quicklaunch-style shortcuts. The only other main difference the Dock has is the large icons / thumbnails of running applications versus the small icon and title bar.

If this works for you, that's fine. I'd imagine it works equally well for the majority of people. But I merely posted my preferences, for me, I like having a Dock.

By the way, on the subject of Quick Launch, how did you get the icons larger?

By the way, on the subject of Quick Launch, how did you get the icons larger?

Just right-click on it, click "View" and then "Large Icons." Same as XP :)

Oh, you have to unlock the taskbar first of course.

I didn't even know you could do this in XP. Cool.

Yup. Only caveat is, they don't get centered vertically with the Start orb, like they are in my screenshot above. One way to achieve that is via Free Launch Bar (or True Launch Bar, the non-free premium version).

Yup. Only caveat is, they don't get centered vertically with the Start orb, like they are in my screenshot above. One way to achieve that is via Free Launch Bar (or True Launch Bar, the non-free premium version).

That's one of the things I really like about Vista, the Orb centers vertically. That always bugged me about XP, that the button would get shoved to the top when I make my taskbar two rows high.

  • 6 months later...

I get really annoyed when people have to insert their own comments as to why we should like the new start menu, or how we can use the search function to search our start menu, or how the XP start menu was no good.

I have my XP start menu VERY organized and I don't take a long time to find things in it.

When I'm wanting to launch a program I certainly DO NOT WANT TO TYPE the name of what I'm looking for.

Microsoft would have FAR FAR LESS problems by just letting people choose between the new Vista Start menu, the Windows 9X start menu, or the XP start menu.

Now the title of this thread was not "Please give me your opinions on why I should not want the XP start menu in Vista" it was "Is it possible to bring back the XP Start Menu in Vista?".

Now I would hope that all posts past mine would offer some insight into how to make this happen. Someone posted on page 1 about using Windows Blinds or WinBlinds. Can someone shed some light into how that works and if that is compatible with the Windows Sidebar.

All i want is a the silly XP start menu. How complicated is that to integrate into all the other new things Vista has to offer. I wouldn't mind using Vista if I could have my old start menu. I don't like the Vista start menu and I didn't see the need to change a perfectly working XP start menu, and I REALLY do not understand why the end user is not given a choice.

Please, no comments on why Vistas is better, just tell us how to get an XP menu working in Vista.

Fever

Someone posted on page 1 about using Windows Blinds or WinBlinds. Can someone shed some light into how that works and if that is compatible with the Windows Sidebar.
Windowblinds, to my knowledge, does not emulate the behavior of the XP start menu.
I don't like the Vista start menu and I didn't see the need to change a perfectly working XP start menu, and I REALLY do not understand why the end user is not given a choice.
Perhaps that there weren't enough differences between the XP and Vista start menus to warrant its inclusion as an option. Differences between the 9x and XP/Vista start menus on the other hand are quite big.

It is possible if someone out there writes a replacement start menu for Vista just as one wrote a vista-like one for XP.

  • 2 weeks later...

Vista's start menu is what I didn't like in it as soon as I saw it. I like being able to organize my menu into categories. The only plus was that auto arranged the menu, otherwise it was crap. Vista's start menu is yet another way the OS has taken choice away from you.

  • 3 weeks later...
LMAO ;) Hell, they copied some of OS X anyway. ;) lol

The time machine idea in OSX is Microsoft's idea "Accept for the graphic part". Microsoft calls it "Volume Shadow Copy". It comes from Server 2003.

I'm still undecided on how much I like the new start menu. Visually it's ok, but the functionality doesn't impress me that much. But as others have said I just use a dock program anyways.

:)

I use a trackball mouse with a wheel and I really enjoy the new Start menu....Just get use to the wheel on your mouse and you will not want to go back. The new start menu was built with using the wheel in mind.

I'm still undecided on how much I like the new start menu. Visually it's ok, but the functionality doesn't impress me that much. But as others have said I just use a dock program anyways.

:)

I use a trackball mouse with a wheel and I really enjoy the new Start menu....Just get use to the wheel on your mouse and you will not want to go back. The new start menu was built with using the wheel in mind.

  • 2 weeks later...
Yup. Only caveat is, they don't get centered vertically with the Start orb, like they are in my screenshot above. One way to achieve that is via Free Launch Bar (or True Launch Bar, the non-free premium version).

I used to love using Free Launch Bar on XP, but in Vista when you run it, it removes the transparency on the task bar for some reason. It's very annoying, so I dont use it anymore.

Anyone got any solution for the above problem?

I get really annoyed when people have to insert their own comments as to why we should like the new start menu, or how we can use the search function to search our start menu, or how the XP start menu was no good.

I have my XP start menu VERY organized and I don't take a long time to find things in it.

When I'm wanting to launch a program I certainly DO NOT WANT TO TYPE the name of what I'm looking for.

Microsoft would have FAR FAR LESS problems by just letting people choose between the new Vista Start menu, the Windows 9X start menu, or the XP start menu.

Now the title of this thread was not "Please give me your opinions on why I should not want the XP start menu in Vista" it was "Is it possible to bring back the XP Start Menu in Vista?".

Now I would hope that all posts past mine would offer some insight into how to make this happen. Someone posted on page 1 about using Windows Blinds or WinBlinds. Can someone shed some light into how that works and if that is compatible with the Windows Sidebar.

All i want is a the silly XP start menu. How complicated is that to integrate into all the other new things Vista has to offer. I wouldn't mind using Vista if I could have my old start menu. I don't like the Vista start menu and I didn't see the need to change a perfectly working XP start menu, and I REALLY do not understand why the end user is not given a choice.

Please, no comments on why Vistas is better, just tell us how to get an XP menu working in Vista.

Fever

For me the new and useless 'Start Menu' is the most disliked feature of Vista. In fact I dislike it so much that I am even willing to use the archaic 'Win9x Start Menu'. In my opinion Microsoft really screwed up big time by meddling with the 'XP Start Menu'. Now if only they or some third party could provide an alternate for people like us who cannot do without the 'XP Start Menu'. I have tried 'Vista Start Menu v2.7' it is certainly better than the useless 'Vista Start Menu' but ti is still not as neat and functional as the 'XP Start Menu'.

The vista start menu is far Superior, the search makes it incredibly easy to find any program easily, and the tree view instead of the cascading menu makes it quicker so you don't have to look through another menu. Dragging stuff in the start menu is much better too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft brings Claude to its own Azure infrastructure, powered by Nvidia GB300 Blackwell by Karthik Mudaliar Anthropic's Claude models are now generally available in Microsoft Foundry on Azure and are running on Nvidia's GB300 Blackwell Ultra systems. Nvidia wrote in its announcement that the models are hosted on Microsoft Azure and accelerated by GB300 Blackwell Ultra GPUs, with Quantum-X800 InfiniBand networking used to support larger agentic systems and specialized sub-agents that can operate across business domains. This is great for customers and enterprises that want to build autonomous and domain-specific AI agents using Claude without moving outside Microsoft’s cloud platform. Microsoft currently offers Claude models in Foundry in two forms: “Hosted on Azure,” which runs end-to-end on Azure infrastructure and is generally available, and “Hosted on Anthropic infrastructure,” which remains in preview. This separation is quite important for organizations that have procurement, compliance, data processing, or internal governance requirements tied to Azure. Anthropic currently has 11 Claude models listed in Microsoft Foundry, including Opus 4.8, Sonnet 4.6, and even the unavailable Mythos and Fable models. Billing is handled through Claude Consumption Units (CCUs). Microsoft says CCU is an invoicing unit for Claude models in Foundry, with token usage converted using Anthropic’s published per-model token rates. The usage is billed through Azure Marketplace just like models from other distributors and appears on the customer's Azure invoice, while eligible spend can count against a Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment. For starters, GB300 NVL72 is a rack-scale, fully liquid-cooled system that combines 72 Blackwell Ultra GPUs and 36 Grace CPUs. Nvidia has listed 37TB of fast memory, 130TB/s of NVLink bandwidth, and FP4 Tensor Core performance of up to 1,440 petaflops with sparsity. The deal is also part of a three-way partnership between Microsoft, Nvidia, and Anthropic. Under the deal, Anthropic has committed to buying $30 billion in Azure compute capacity and contracting additional capacity up to one gigawatt. Nvidia and Microsoft also said they would invest up to $10 billion and $5 billion in Anthropic, respectively.
    • WhatsApp is getting usernames, and you can reserve your preferred one now by Fiza Ali Sharing your phone number isn't always something you want to do, especially with people you've just met. Whether it's someone from a class, a local community group, or a sports team chat, handing over your number can feel like giving away more personal information than necessary. That's exactly the problem WhatsApp is trying to solve with its upcoming usernames feature. The company has announced that users can now reserve a unique WhatsApp username ahead of the feature's wider rollout later this year. Once usernames become available, they'll let people connect without revealing their phone numbers. It's a change that makes a lot of sense for group chats. Right now, everyone in the group can see your phone number. With usernames enabled, that won't necessarily be the case when someone contacts you for the first time. WhatsApp says it's opening username reservations early because more than three billion people use the app, meaning plenty of people are likely to want the same usernames. Reserving one now gives users a better chance of securing the name they actually want before the feature launches more broadly. If your preferred username is already taken, WhatsApp will also offer a built-in username generator to suggest available alternatives. The feature isn't only aimed at individual users. Creators, businesses, and organisations will be able to claim the same username they already use on Instagram or Facebook, making it easier to keep a consistent identity across Meta's apps. Furthermore, privacy is a big part of how WhatsApp is introducing usernames. There won't be a public directory where people can browse or search for usernames. Instead, people will need to know your exact username before they can start a conversation with you. Additionally, users can also choose to enable a username key, which adds another layer of control by requiring people to enter that key before sending a message. Once the feature rolls out, people who choose to use a username will no longer have their phone number shown when messaging a person or business for the first time. If you want to reserve a username, make sure you're running the latest version of WhatsApp, then head to Settings > Account > Username. The tech giant says usernames will roll out gradually over the coming months, and users will receive an in-app notification when the feature becomes available in their country.
    • When I think about a network, there are really two aspects, the hardware and the wiring. So here is what I would do for both. Wiring: Use Cat6A for the patch panel, outlets, and all structured cables (cables installed in walls). Run plenty of Wireless Access Point (WAP) cables, as a general rule, assume a signal can only pass through 2-3 walls and can't pass through a floor (that is conservative, but trust me on this if you want strong WiFi)  Cat6 patch cables are fine for now if you don't plan to run 10gig, those are easy to replace later if needed. Run OS2 single-mode fiber to anywhere you think you may have a server or sub-switch. (yes, single-mode for everything on a small network, don't mess with multimode unless you are at a scale where that minor cost and power savings will matter). If you really want to future proof, also run fiber to any high density WAP locations, it is likely that WiFi 8 and beyond WAPs will push the limits of 10g. Run 6-12 pairs of single-mode fiber between your MDF and the building's MDF, even if you only need 1 or 2 pairs now, those extra pairs will pay off down the road. Hardware: (its easy to say "get all the features incase you need them", so instead of futureproofing, I am going to take approach of suggesting areas worth investing in, and areas you can save money). Don't overspend thinking you need every feature on every port. You don't need 10g on every port, you don't need PoE on every port. Don't overspend on redundancy either, unless you are ready to buy two of everything, don't waste money buying two of some things and not others. Dual power supplies are worthwhile, but probably not HA or multi-path redundancy.  Get 1 "distribution layer" switch that your router/firewall will connect to as well as all your access layer switches below. This should be a fully managed 10g+ switch with a combination of copper and SPF ports, a few 25g uplink ports are nice for this switch. Given that you said it is a small network, I suggest also using that distribution layer switch for servers and WAPs, meaning it will need PoE. Speaking of wireless, get good professional tri-band WAPs, and either turn on the band stirring options, or limit 2.4 to an IoT only SSID. This will provide a solid WiFi capable nearly everything but the highest of bandwidth clients...you could even consider skipping wiring workstations depending on usage. Access layer switch for workstations and printers can be cheaper switches, 2.5g is a good sweet spot between price and future proofing, but even 1g is fine for most individual clients (the kind that could probably be fine on WiFi). You can consider saving a little on access layer switches by only getting 1 PoE switch for whatever needs it (remember your WAPs are connecting to the distribution switch, not here), and non-PoE for your workstations, because desk phones are falling out of favor. You can also save money here by not buying managed switches if you don't need them--but really do some soul searching there, if you go this route, then anything that isn't on your workstation VLAN would either need to be connected to the distribution switch, or its own access layer switch. Also, don't feel like you need a fancy fabric stacking switches for your access layer, that is the point of the higher-end distribution layer, to remove the need for things like that at this level. Home Hardware: I'm realizing the above assumed an office setting, if this if for your house and home lab then the above still applies, but you'll probably want everything managed and PoE, just because, but you probably also don't need multiple access layer switches. If your total port count is below 24, just skip separating distribution layer and access layer and just get one nice switch with the features you want. If you are at the point of considering a 48-port switch, I would instead get a nice high-end distribution switch for things that need it, and cheaper access layer switches with specs based on the needs of connected devices. For home use, don't worry about home running every device to the main switch, there is nothing wrong with running sub-switches for your media areas and office, those essentially become your access layer, just look for sub-switches with a 10g uplink so sharing bandwidth isn't an issue. Just make sure you always connect them to your distribution/main switch, don't daisy chain, the path should never have more steps than Client>Access>Distribution>Firewall>Internet or Client>Access>Distribution>Server if it is local.
    • Google Meet brings Gemini note-taking to AI Pro and Ultra subscribers by Karthik Mudaliar Google's Gemini-powered "Take notes for me" feature inside Google Meet is now available to Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. The features work on Google Meet for web as well as on mobile, and Google says that subscribers can use it for meetings they host in many supported languages. As the name suggests, "Take notes for me" allows Gemini to listen to a meeting, generate a summary, identify action items, and save the notes as a Google Doc in the user’s Drive. After the meeting, the organizer receives an email recap with the summary and action items, while the notes can also be attached to the related Calendar event depending on the meeting setup and sharing settings. The feature isn't automatically turned on for everyone, though. Google says that all meeting participants are notified when note-taking is turned on, and users can start it from the pencil icon in Meet or enable it for future calls through Meet’s meeting records settings. For work or school accounts, administrators can also control whether the feature is available and may require explicit participant consent for note-taking, recording, or transcription features. The feature first launched back in 2024, when it was available just for selected Workspace users. Over the years, Google added refinements and more options, including the ability to enable it when scheduling meetings via Google Calendar. Google's support docs say that the feature currently supports English, French, German, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish, but only one language at a time. Meetings with multiple spoken languages are not currently supported, and Google recommends using the tool for meetings between 15 minutes and eight hours. The new feature makes Google Meet closer to its rivals that have AI tools already built in. Microsoft Teams has recently started offering Copilot and intelligent recap features that summarize meetings, surface highlights, and help with follow-ups, while Zoom’s AI Companion can also generate meeting summaries from desktop and mobile meetings.
    • GnuCash 5.16 by Razvan Serea GnuCash is a personal and small business finance application, freely licensed under the GNU GPL and available for GNU/Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X and Microsoft Windows. It’s designed to be easy to use, yet powerful and flexible. GnuCash allows you to track your income and expenses, reconcile bank accounts, monitor stock portfolios and manage your small business finances. It is based on professional accounting principles to ensure balanced books and accurate reports. GnuCash can keep track of your personal finances in as much detail as you prefer. If you are just starting out, use GnuCash to keep track of your checkbook. You may then decide to track cash as well as credit card purchases to better determine where your money is being spent. When you start investing, you can use GnuCash to help monitor your portfolio. Buying a vehicle or a home? GnuCash will help you plan the investment and track loan payments. If your financial records span the globe, GnuCash provides all the multiple-currency support you need. Between 5.15 and 5.16, the following bugfixes were accomplished: Bug 421610 - RFE: Include logical dates for View->Filter by "date range"The Select Range section of the Date tab of the register's Filter By dialog box is changed to provide relative, specific date, or days ago options for the start and end of the filter range. The Show number of days item label is changed to Show from days ago to better reflect what it does. Bug 436105 - esc key not working as expected in register: Enable the escape key to cancel a field edit. Bug 797384 - Gnucash doesn't handle commodity prices with big numerator/denominator properly. Bug 798004 - Next gen UI for stock transactions Bug 799314 - Add "enter now" option in scheduled transaction editor. tab to allow users to select the scheduled transactions to be included in a “Since Last Run…” window. If there are no instances of a selected transaction triggered by today’s date, the next instance is triggered. Bug 799751 - autocomplete crash Bug 799759 - Users can't Enable entries via Checkboxes on Scheduled Transactions PageAllow the Enabled box in the list of scheduled transactions to be operated instead of having to open the transaction editor dialog and change the Enabled checkbox. Also added use of the Name column as the secondary column sort for all the other columns. Bug 799762 - Poor handling of cases where hidden/placeholder accounts are used in the account register Bug 799766 - Double line preference not respected in search register Bug 799767 - POST /accounts in bindings/python/example_scripts/rest-api is broken Bug 799777 - `xaccSplitSetParent`: reparenting a committed split silently drops its KVP slots (online_id, cap-gains links) Other changes & improvements: Numeric values may now be selected to copy in the Accounts page. Add new Finance::Quote source Finnhub.io: Free API key (personal/non-professional use) available at https://finnhub.io. Set FINNHUB_API_KEY environment variable to API key to use this source. As of June 2026, free tier API limit is 60 API calls/minute. The Investment Lots report has new optional columns for Computed Annual Growth Rate. Python Bindings: Improved translation of primary object (Account, Transaction, Split, etc.) so that they can be treated as normal Python objects. This is accomplished with SWIG magic so no existing code is obsoleted. Python Bindings: Better conversion of GLists to Python lists. Python Bindings: Destroy the QofSession in the Python Session dtor to prevent leaving the database locked. [engine] Add first-class online_id accessors for Split and Account and make them available to Python bindings, removing the unused Transaction online_id property. Improve C++ implementation of QofBook. Correct the Doxygen doc for qof_instance_get/set_kvp. [gnc-log-replay.cpp] fix incorrect guid dump Add some Boost library requirements needed by libgnucash-guile to CMakeLists.txt so that missing feature will fail at configure time. Use Compile-time Regular Expressions instead of std::regex in gnc-filepath-utils.cpp and instead of boost::regex in the CSV importer, with the CTRE v3.11.1 header added to borrowed [gnc-filepath-utils.cpp] null check char* arguments Add ChartJS licenses. Removed AEX from list of commodities. euronext.com is now using JS based anti-webscraping. [report-core] always offer options summary in reports. This is useful to debug reports. The Add options summary option is removed because it's no longer optional. Remove remaining obsolete IMContext from sheet Fix blurry text in HiDPI offscreen-rendered widgets Add port field to database connection dialog: The convention of appending the port number after the host isn't obvious. When editing a split in the register treat the account as being changed only if it isn't the one selected before editing instead of if the user performed an edit Return immediately from qof_book_destroy if hash_of_collections is null. If qof_book_destroy is called on a QofBook* freshly created with qof_book_new (usually because it was used to create a session that now must be destroyed) it would try to empty the non-existent hash tables, crashing. Clean up Flathub metadata to solve warnings at flatpak build time. Be consistent in naming GncPluginPage and GncPluginPageRegister HTML: Remove unimplemented function declarations. [gnc-html.cpp] remove unused buggy string conversion functions Convert libgnc-html to C++ Apply -Wall -Werr -Wmissing-prototypes to C++ compilation on Windows and fix the resulting errors. New and Updated Translations: Arabic, Croatian, Danish, Dutch, German, Finnish, Hungarian, Korean, Norwegian-Bokmal, Spanish Download: GnuCash 5.16 | 176.0 MB (Open Source) Links: GnuCash Home page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      150
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!