Recommended Posts

Im pretty sure that Microsoft tweaked the defragger in Longhorn Server so its more informative. I could be wrong but I swear I read this somewhere. If its true, atleast with a bit of luck, Defrag.exer will be updated with Vista SP1.

Yeah, I have Longhorn Server and it is more informative and more flexible. For example, if you want to defrag only one volume or partition you can select it alone.

i use powerdefragmentergui which is a frontend for sysinternals' contig.exe

http://www.excessive-software.eu.tt/

http://download.sysinternals.com/Files/Contig.zip

you can defrag whole drives, folders or even just single files. still no fancy chart to look at though.... :p

Yeah I noticed that the defragger in Vista is actually good, I just wish it had a nice block graph that I could look at.

It doesn't make any sense to have the graph or to show progress with Vista's defragging algorithm. As I understand it, it does one pass, then decides whether or not to go again, so it doesn't have any clue as to how long its going to take until its done.

The past several threads of this nature that have popped up I've mentioned Auslogics Disk Defrag?>. My opinion has not changed. Aside from the price (free), it is a magnificent app.

Auslogics Disk Defrag?[/b]b>

Awesome mate!! Thanx:)

Any chance for a clear resent, temp and Defrag only disk C as well?

Thanx again!

Sure no problem here is the script to clear recent,temp and defrag c drive only.

Save As SysMaintence_C_Only.vbs

 Const MY_RECENT_DOCUMENTS = &H8&
 Dim Arg1, ColItems, File, GB, ObjItem, StrF, StrFItem, strComputer, Var1
  strComputer = "." 
 Dim Shell :Set Shell = CreateObject("Shell.Application")
 Dim Act   :Set Act = CreateObject("Wscript.Shell")
 Dim Fso   :Set Fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
 Dim Wmi   :Set Wmi = GetObject("winmgmts:\\" & strComputer & "\root\CIMV2") 
  Set StrF = Shell.Namespace(MY_RECENT_DOCUMENTS)
  Set StrFItem = StrF.Self
  Set ColItems = StrF.Items
'/-> Clear Recent List 
   If ColItems.Count = 0 Then
	Act.Popup "Recent is Empty, Nothing To Delete",3,"Clear Recent",4128
   Else 
	Act.Popup "Preparing To Clean Up The Recent Folder",3,"Clear Recent",4128
   For Each ObjItem in ColItems
	Set Arg1 = Fso.GetFile(ObjItem.Path)
	Arg1.Delete()
   Next
  End If 
'/-> Clears User Tmp Folder
  Set Var1 = Fso.GetFolder(Fso.GetSpecialFolder(2))
  Set File = Var1.Files 
  Act.Popup "Preparing To Clean Up User Temp" & vbCrLf & Var1.Path,3,Var1.Name,4128 
  For Each StrF In File
   If InStr(StrF.Name,".bmp") Then 
	Else 
	 Set Arg1 = Fso.GetFile(StrF.Path) 
	 On Error Resume Next 
	Arg1.Delete()
   End If 
  Next
'/-> Defrag All Drives
  GB = Int(1073741824)
  Set ColItems = Wmi.ExecQuery("SELECT * FROM Win32_LogicalDisk",,48) 
  For Each ObjItem in ColItems 
   If ObjItem.DriveType = 3 Then 
'/-> Defrag C Drive Only 
	If InStr(ObjItem.Caption,"C") Or InStr(ObjItem.Caption,"c") Then 
	 Var1 = objItem.Size - objItem.FreeSpace
	 Act.Popup "Preparing To Defrag This Drive" & vbCrLf &_
	 Space(3) & "Drive Letter"& vbTab & ObjItem.Caption & vbCrLf &_
	 Space(3) & "Volume Name" & vbTab & objItem.VolumeName & vbCrLf &_
	 Space(3) & "Total Size" & vbTab & FormatNumber(objItem.Size/GB,2) & " GB" & vbCrLf &_
	 Space(3) & "Free Space" & vbTab & FormatNumber(objItem.FreeSpace/GB,2) & " GB" & vbCrLf &_
	 Space(3) & "Used Space" & vbTab & FormatNumber(Var1/GB,2) & " GB", 3,"Defrag",4128
	 Act.Run("Defrag.exe " & ObjItem.Caption &"\"),2,True 
	End If 
   End If 
  Next
  Act.Popup "Finished The Defrag",7,"Finshed Defrag",4128

That's a good find, thanks. I think the first item mentioned alone is a good argument to continue with what's built in.

Also, it doesn't bother me so much that Defrag is Spartan, since defrag really is a scheduled task at heart. Who wants to be around when it's happening? Vista's built-in scheduler defaults to defragging all drives though, which not everyone's going to want. To change it:

1) Search your Start menu for "Sched..."

2) Once in Task Scheduler, find the Defrag task in the Microsoft/Windows section.

3) Click on ScheduledDefrag and bring up its Properties.

4) Go to the Actions and edit the arguments section as appropriate.

The "-c" switch is the one that means "all volumes," so I got rid of that and replaced it with "c:" for just that drive. So the arguments read:

c: -i

("-i" just means that it won't activate if it's seen recent user activity)

Personally I'd still like a progress bar even if it's not fully accurate. I don't see the point having it running while I'm using the computer. I am pleased to see scheduling Defrag is back the XP one (which had an awful interface) had no scheduler, even though the 9x one does.

It's good to see it no longer tries to defrag to 100% as that's ultimately pointless and hard to achieve anyway. I used to run Diskeeper under XP and while it's excellent for Home Users it's really overkill. Servers fine but Home Users it's not necessary. A modern hard disk really shouldn't get that fragmented anyway. It also ran in the background all the time which I really wasn't too keen on.

I say stick with Vista's, choose a suitable schedule (mine is set for Sunday's at 6am) and forget about it.

OO Software just released version 10 of their software; see http://www.oo-software.com/home/en/products/oodefrag/

Anyone already has some experience with this version 10 on Vista (Ultimate) 32 bit?

Or is PerfectDisk 8 "da thing to have installed on Vista"?

Yes, I've been using OOs v10 all day. It's pretty good.

Although whats strange is this. I had PerfectDisk 8 installed, defragged all drives. Uninstalled and installed OO 10.

Analysis showed a worrying 33% fragmentation on the Windows drive, which had just been thoroughly defragged with PerfectDisk.

So I did a COMPLETE/Name defrag with OO, and the fragmentation % wouldn't go below 27.

Thinking this may be due to locked files, I did an offline defrag also, but it had no effect.

I can't seem to achieve 0% fragmentation with it.

I'll probably stick with PerfectDisk.

  • 2 weeks later...
Does anyone know of a defragger that stresses how well it actually defrags the drive? I really don't care about how long it takes(well no more than 12 hours for 60 GB of data). I just 0% of defragmentation!!!

See post at to of this page.

  • 5 weeks later...

I've been using DK (Diskeeper) since Win98, so that was my first choice on the new laptop with Vista. I got DK2007 for it and my desktop (still on XP). It works great on the desktop, but for some reason there are a couple files on the laptop that it can never defrag. There's even times where they don't show up. They have some type of CLSID for the file name, but it's so long you can't read it all in the display (see attachments). Any other DK user see this happening?

Because of this, I was looking at the Auslogic one to try out. I saw a couple people mention that here. With the past history of the default defragger, I didn't want to try that one. Has anyone else tried multiple ones before going with the one they selected in their post?

Many thanks,

Ed S.

Vista_fragments.doc

Vista_fragments_2.doc

Edited by Ed Szuba

I just use the built-in defragger running at 02:00 everyday when I'm asleep! ... good enough for me ..

I'm not bothered about all the bells and whistles ... as for watching the pretty bar charts (meaningless IMHO) ... whats the point in that!, I've got better things to do with my time ...

  • 1 year later...

I think you should stick with the built-in defragmenter. It's unintrusive and almost completely automatic. Why would you want to sit there and watch your drives being defragmented? You could also use Task Scheduler to automate Disk Cleanup. Seamless, automatic and free.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glad these prices are starting to come down, but that is still crazy. I bought the 2TB 9100 Pro (slightly more expensive version with PCIe 5.0) last year for $240.
    • The 2TB Samsung 990 PRO NVMe SSD hits lowest price in over three months by Sayan Sen Yesterday, we covered a really good deal wherein you can get a 4TB TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 NVMe PCIe Gen4 SSD for a low price of just $400 with a special discount coupon. That's just $100 per TB, making it a very good offer during these hard times. The deal is still live, so you can check it out in its dedicated article here if you do not want to miss out. Meanwhile, if you don't have that kind of budget but still wish to buy an SSD for a good price, the 2TB variant of the TeamGroup SSD at $280 its lowest price in over three months. Meanwhile, those seeking 2TB but faster performance can check out Samsung's 990 PRO, which has hit the lowest price also in the last quarter or so, as it's on sale for $370 (purchase links under the specs table down below). Thus, you want a faster drive, get the 990 Pro, or you want more capacity, grab the TeamGroup 4TB linked in the first para. The 990 PRO is a PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD and still one of the fastest drives available today for under $500. Speaking of fast, sequential reads and writes are rated at 7450 MB/s and 6900 MB/s, respectively. The random throughputs for reads and writes are 1400K IOPS and 1550K IOPS, respectively. The 990 PRO is based on Samsung's 7th Gen V-NAND flash, and it too is TLC. It packs 2 gigs of LPDDR4 DRAM cache, which helps the random performance. The endurance rating for this is 1200 TBW (terabytes written), which should be sufficient for most users. The Samsung 990 PRO is compatible with the PlayStation 5, but if you are going to use the 990 PRO on a PC, check out the Samsung Magician app that lets you track your drive's health, update its firmware, customize various settings, and more. The tech specs are given below: Specification TeamGroup T-FORCE G50 2TB Samsung 990 PRO 2TB Interface PCIe 4.0 x4, NVMe 1.4 PCIe Gen 4.0 x4, NVMe 2.0 Form Factor M.2 2280 M.2 2280 Controller InnoGrit Controller Samsung In-house Controller NAND Flash 3D TLC 3D TLC DRAM Cache None (HMB supported) 2GB LPDDR4 Sequential Read (Max) 5,000 MB/s 7,450 MB/s Sequential Write (Max) 4,500 MB/s 6,900 MB/s Random Read (4K) Up to 600,000 IOPS Up to 1,400,000 IOPS Random Write (4K) Up to 700,000 IOPS Up to 1,550,000 IOPS TBW (Endurance) 1,300 TBW 1,200 TBW MTBF 3,000,000 hours 1,500,000 hours Operating Temperature 0°C to 70°C 0°C to 70°C Storage Temperature -40°C to 85°C -40°C to 85°C Shock Resistance 1,500G / 0.5ms 1,500G / 0.5ms Heatsink Patented Graphene Heat Spreader No Get them at the links below: Samsung 990 PRO SSD 2TB (MZ-V9P2T0B/AM): $369.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 2TB SSD (TM8FFE002T0C129): $279.99 (Sold by TeamGroup, Shipped by Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • If you can't spell a simple word that 2nd graders learn, your entire argument is suspect.
    • And here goes the "Won't someone think of the children" brigade. Get stuffed mate. This has NOTHING to do with making the internet safe. It's about tracking adults, spying on your online activity, and sending the boys around when they don't like something you post. Also, again, parliament have voted TWICE against this, and Starmer is going ahead anyway. THAT is anti-democratic bullsh**. They will use this law to track you, they will use this law to control you, and they will use this law to punish you if they don't like what you do, even if it's legal. And your data? Say bye bye to that. It'll be on the darkweb in weeks. I'm not some rando online. I've been an IT professional for 40 years, many of it in security. I know exactly what this means and what will happen to your data. I do not consent and I will not comply.
    • "...but it may not be Microsoft's fault" seems like a reasonable way to tease what is going on without leaving the user with a false impression that an update is the problem. A title isn't a summery, it is meant to entice the user to read the article. It should not contain a misleading premise; which this title does not. You could maybe complain that the first paragraph should have included that detail. The writing style popularized over 100 years ago in newspapers will cover the most important information as soon as possible with details and nuance added later; the idea being that with each new paragraph you have less of the reader's focus.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Prasann earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      90
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      81
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!