Recommended Posts

I have a quick question regarding the answer files: I can't seem to get 5.6 to check only the uninstalled modules, if I use an answer file it always checks modules whether they are blue or not. 5.1's answer file was a different structure in notepad I've noticed, where there was a + or - and a hierarchy, such as Recommended Updates. 5.6's structure seems to just list every module checked with no hierarchy or +/-. Is there a way to use an answer file in 5.6 but have it NOT check the already installed updates in blue?

Thanks for the help!

Aaron

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/564168-autopatcher-56-answer-file/
Share on other sites

i think answer files are applied before the item is detected as installed so blue items should not be checked when an answer files is loaded... ill have to double check...

I must be doing something funky then. I'm having the same problem with 2003 and WinXP 5.6, whether I run them from a network share with a batch file or from a local drive with no script. Everything in the answer file gets checked whether it's blue or not. I'll keep tinkering...

nah, my bad... answer files were applied regardless of install-state.

here's a fixed .exe which solves 3 bugs:

- fixed ctrl + i

- blue items are now not selected, even if mentioned by an answer file

- fixed duplicate word in titlebar, when rti files includes the word "AutoPatcher"

autopatcher5.6.73.zip

Thanks Raptor, that did the trick! You guys have done a herculean effort getting 5.6 out the door and I'm quite impressed that you could find so many things to improve over 5.1. My favorite new feature is the maximize button as simple as that sounds. Haha! I'll be a donating member when my next paycheck arrives! :D

nah, my bad... answer files were applied regardless of install-state.

here's a fixed .exe which solves 3 bugs:

- fixed ctrl + i

- blue items are now not selected, even if mentioned by an answer file

- fixed duplicate word in titlebar, when rti files includes the word "AutoPatcher"

Has this updated .exe been updated to the main May core relese yet?

(Just need to know)

Why would the answer file not load checked blue items,

what is the significance of the blue items,

what if I need to load them via answer file?

Thanks

Tommy

nah, my bad... answer files were applied regardless of install-state.

here's a fixed .exe which solves 3 bugs:

- fixed ctrl + i

- blue items are now not selected, even if mentioned by an answer file

- fixed duplicate word in titlebar, when rti files includes the word "AutoPatcher"

  • 2 weeks later...

this may 2007 version of autopatcher is not picking up the default answerfile that i specify .. plus its not also detecting all the windows updates at all !!! for example ... i didn't had windows's recent updates installed , so when i ran it in un-attended mode then only 14 updates were installed !!!! and when i checked manually ... NO such problem was there !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! still FEB 2007 edition rocked for me ...... lets hope i'm not able to see the command line arguments properly ???

autopatcher.exe /noeula /unattend /nobackup /defaults:defaults.aaf

anyone can help me ????

^ Check here.

And don't post the exact same question in two threads.

Welll even I am educated at least so much to find out about the switches !!!!!!! ..

What I was trying to say was that ... when I run the Autopatcher for May 2007 in un-attended mode then it doesn't detects all windows updates required!!!!...... and secondly it doesn't picks the answer file either !! ..

u just gave me the link of the autopatcher command line switches theory !!!!!! I know that all !!!! I need practical analysis of the problem rather than its theoretical links !

hey actually i noticed some changes in autopatcher command liners ... lets hope this works ..

thanks !

Welll even I am educated at least so much to find out about the switches !!!!!!! ..

What I was trying to say was that ... when I run the Autopatcher for May 2007 in un-attended mode then it doesn't detects all windows updates required!!!!...... and secondly it doesn't picks the answer file either !! ..

u just gave me the link of the autopatcher command line switches theory !!!!!! I know that all !!!! I need practical analysis of the problem rather than its theoretical links !

hey actually i noticed some changes in autopatcher command liners ... lets hope this works ..

thanks !

/defaults no longer exists. Use /answerfile instead

nah, my bad... answer files were applied regardless of install-state.

here's a fixed .exe which solves 3 bugs:

- blue items are now not selected, even if mentioned by an answer file

Is it possible to have the load all even if installed as an option somehow. Reason I ask is every time there is a new update of the program and we want to updated are answer list, we have to start all over every month. With the .72 version, it makes it easier to add to the list.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why should simply opening the Action Center ... require any significant amount of CPU cycles? Too many are ignoring the elephant in the room: today's CPUs may have similar clock frequencies to CPUs from a decade ago (~4 to 5 GHz), but they run with far higher performance per clock, even on the smallest E-cores. The Action Center is a static, minor desktop element. It ought to open instantly on any CPU made in the past 2.5 decades at even low clocks. Opening a program? Boost away. Unzipping a file? Boost to your heart's content. Right-clicking the notification area? This should be an ultra-efficient, low-impact event that opens instantly. Compare today's UI elements to Windows 7 UI elements. Today's UI elements hardly do anything more substantial or important or critical, yet now require modern-day processors to jump half a GHz to reduce their latency.
    • This is not an option lmao: it is part of the KB5094126 update, pushed to all users. There is no GUI to configure it. Reading the article should be required for commenting.
    • Can you recommend me a good Pixel 7 on eBay? Because some are saying Gen 1, and I don't think that's what I want, right?
    • Close, but it is for any application starting, not just during boot time. In fact, it probably will not improve boot time at all because during a boot, the CPU is already boosting, so a pre-boost wouldn't change anything. I agree that it isn't exciting (especially considering every other OS already does it), but it is a good thing, even if they are just playing catch up.
    • Any so called performance increase will be in milliseconds, which nobody will actually notice in real world usage.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!