Mount a network folder to a folder instead of a drive?


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

Silly question, but are you just trying to create a folder as follows:

On Server

C:\Some_Folder\folder_with_files_I_Need

On Desktop

C:\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need <------Mapped from server

If this is what you want, then cant you just right click in the folder you want to pace the mapped folder and select create shortcut. Then type in the location such as \\Server\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need.

It worked when i tried it just now, or maybe this is not what you are wanting?

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

What you have shown looks like it would apply to what i said. Simply delete the current folder in the Etc folder and instead create a shortcut to \\somecomputer\NetFolder.

That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

If your just worried that users will see its a shortcut, then just use tweak UI to remove the arrow on shortcuts?

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

We have done what you are asking for on our network here. We change the path on My Documents folder on XP-SP2 from local disk to a location on the server. First, a login script runs that maps a letter to a folder on the server. Then based on that letter, we remove the default under properties on My Documents and change it to "U:\". Since the user already has a mapped drive called "P:\\server-name\user name" the user has access to that drive by simply putting "U:\". In your case, you might want to share the drive/folder first and give proper rights to the user/s.

Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

No you couldnt access IamAFile.txt by creating a folder shortcut, but creating a shortcut directly to that file?

Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

I really dont understand the problem with what i said? You can even turn on syncronisation to make the drive available offline.

I think either you or I am missing or not understanding eachother, because i have what i said working at home and it works flawlessely.

If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

Ah ok, i think i see what your saying.

Then you would type it as follows:

c:\Test\Test\somefile.exe.lnk

That would work, but probably not what you are looking for.

Sorry for getting abrupt, but i really didnt understand what the problem was for you.

SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

Thanks for the tip, I actually tried junction yesterday and found out it doesn't have that functionality for network folders. :)

I think it's time I gave up on this, it doesn't appear that it can be done. If it could I'm sure I would have found a solution by now, or someone here would know something - for sure before I would. :) Thanks to all that tried to help me, it's much appreciated.

Have you tried mounting the network forder as a local Drive:

Then use juntion to "juntion" the local drive to the folder you want.

\\Network folder\ -> Drive x:

juntion x -> c: \whatever\juntion folder\

Actually yes. . . it appears that any and all programs I've found/tried only work on physical volumes, not virtual drives as I think they're called. It didn't work in Disk Management or with any of the programs I've tried.

Never mind this thread, I gave up on this already :) Thanks for all the help though.

If a mod could close this thread?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
    • I don't believe them that anyone using threads, at least meaningfully. It's the same thing for Facebook, people just don't engage with Meta platforms like they are thinking. This isn't 2006.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!