Mount a network folder to a folder instead of a drive?


Recommended Posts

Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

Silly question, but are you just trying to create a folder as follows:

On Server

C:\Some_Folder\folder_with_files_I_Need

On Desktop

C:\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need <------Mapped from server

If this is what you want, then cant you just right click in the folder you want to pace the mapped folder and select create shortcut. Then type in the location such as \\Server\Some_Folder\Folder_With_Files_I_Need.

It worked when i tried it just now, or maybe this is not what you are wanting?

  kevinmd88 said:
Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

What you have shown looks like it would apply to what i said. Simply delete the current folder in the Etc folder and instead create a shortcut to \\somecomputer\NetFolder.

That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

  kevinmd88 said:
That was my first try as far as getting this done, but I need Windows and programs to actually see it as a folder, not a shortcut. So that programs/users/Windows think it's on the drive but it's actually, what I guess would be called a "symlink" to the network folder.

A shortcut is only a shortcut so programs won't be able to access the folder on the drive as if they were using the network.

If your just worried that users will see its a shortcut, then just use tweak UI to remove the arrow on shortcuts?

  kevinmd88 said:
Hi all. I am using WinXP Pro SP2 and am wondering if it is possible to map a directory on a network to a local folder. Sort of like the Map Network Drive feature, but that only lets you map to a drive letter, which is not what I want to do. :) On that note, I even tried mapping the network folder to a drive letter and changing the mount in Computer Management, but of course the Disk Management only shows physical drives. :/

In summary, I want the following path:

C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder

to point to:

\\somecomputer\NetFolder

Does anyone know of an XP feature that will do this? If not, is there any 3rd party software that will do this?

Thanks in advance :)

We have done what you are asking for on our network here. We change the path on My Documents folder on XP-SP2 from local disk to a location on the server. First, a login script runs that maps a letter to a folder on the server. Then based on that letter, we remove the default under properties on My Documents and change it to "U:\". Since the user already has a mapped drive called "P:\\server-name\user name" the user has access to that drive by simply putting "U:\". In your case, you might want to share the drive/folder first and give proper rights to the user/s.

Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

  kevinmd88 said:
Well it's not just users, I also need programs to recognize it as an actual folder instead of a shortcut. I may be wrong, but if I put a shortcut called "IamAShortcut" and point it to a folder on the D: drive, and in that folder there is a file called "IamAFile.txt," I am fairly sure I can't type "IAmAShortcut\IamAFile.txt" to access that file. . .

The folder I am trying to create unfortunately isn't in the My Documents folder so that doesn't help, but thanks for the tip :)

No you couldnt access IamAFile.txt by creating a folder shortcut, but creating a shortcut directly to that file?

Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

  kevinmd88 said:
Well that would mean having to create shortcuts for every file in the directory, not to mention the programs still couldn't use them to access the files because they end in .lnk instead of the proper extension. I need to basically "fool" programs, etc., into thinking the network folder is on the local disk.

I really dont understand the problem with what i said? You can even turn on syncronisation to make the drive available offline.

I think either you or I am missing or not understanding eachother, because i have what i said working at home and it works flawlessely.

If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

  kevinmd88 said:
If I just create a shortcut called "ThisFolder" in "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc" and point it to "\\somecomputer\NetFolder," and in the NetFolder there is a file called "file.txt" I won't be able to access said file with the path "C:\Folder1\Folder2\Etc\ThisFolder\file.txt" because it's a shortcut not an actual folder. In Windows if you double click the shortcut it will take you to the target directory, but if I use the Start->Run box or if a program tries to access it like that, it won't be able to find the file because the shortcut is not an actual folder on the drive.

Sorry for not being clear before :)

Ah ok, i think i see what your saying.

Then you would type it as follows:

c:\Test\Test\somefile.exe.lnk

That would work, but probably not what you are looking for.

Sorry for getting abrupt, but i really didnt understand what the problem was for you.

SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

  antaris said:
SysInternals (now Windows SysInternals) have a tool called Junction which allows you to create mount points (symbolic links) through you file system. Windows doesn't actually support this for remote shares, but local folders it works a treat. Junction is a console application, it has no UI.

You can download it from http://www.microsoft.com/technet/sysintern...k/Junction.mspx

Usage: junction <junction> <target>

e.g junction C:\Tools\MyFolder C:\Windows\System32.

When you explore C:\Tools\MyFolder, you are actually exploring System32.

Hope that helps.

Thanks for the tip, I actually tried junction yesterday and found out it doesn't have that functionality for network folders. :)

I think it's time I gave up on this, it doesn't appear that it can be done. If it could I'm sure I would have found a solution by now, or someone here would know something - for sure before I would. :) Thanks to all that tried to help me, it's much appreciated.

  MarlboroNeo said:
Have you tried mounting the network forder as a local Drive:

Then use juntion to "juntion" the local drive to the folder you want.

\\Network folder\ -> Drive x:

juntion x -> c: \whatever\juntion folder\

Actually yes. . . it appears that any and all programs I've found/tried only work on physical volumes, not virtual drives as I think they're called. It didn't work in Disk Management or with any of the programs I've tried.

Never mind this thread, I gave up on this already :) Thanks for all the help though.

If a mod could close this thread?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think you misread the article. The proposed features doesn't create articles, it adds a summery section to existing articles that is AI generated, and based on the screenshot provided, does make it very clear that it is machine generated.
    • Lol, who still expects privacy in a facecrook-owned product these days? Let alone one that's 100% cloud hosted and doesn't function offline...
    • I stand by my "reading comprehension" statement. Every single point you bring up here I have already replied to in detail in. I am not going to spend time repeating myself to someone who isn't reading what I say. I am happy to have a conversation if you want to respond to anything I have said. I will happily admit when I am wrong if it comes to that. If you are just going to keep repeating your original claims and I have already responded to them, then it sounds like neither of us have any more to add to the conversation.
    • LG's UltraGear 32GX870A-B OLED gaming monitor hits a new low price by Paul Hill Are you in the US and looking for a top-of-the-line gaming monitor? Then be sure to check out the LG UltraGear OLED gaming monitor; it’s now discounted by 14% from its $1,400 list price, down to $1,210. This means you’ll be saving $190 if you decide to buy it now at its lowest price so far. Check out the buying link at the end of the article. If this monitor is still too high in price, there is also the 27-inch model available with a 20% discount bringing the price down to $796.99. In this piece, I will be focusing on the larger model, so be sure to double check the details of the 27-inch model separately for differences. If you were thinking about buying this as a Father’s Day gift, it is not going to arrive in time with standard delivery; however, you can get a Prime member trial to get it in time. 4K 240Hz or FHD 480Hz? One of the big features with the LG UltraGear OLED gaming monitor is the VESA-certified Dual Mode. It lets you select 4K Ultra-HD at 240Hz for graphically rich games where you want to see all the details or Full HD (1080p) at 480Hz for fast-paced titles. If you’re in a single-player game and want to take in all the details, the first option will be best. If you’re playing an intense multiplayer shooter, then the second option will be better to reduce lag further. Speaking of lag, this monitor supports an impressive 0.03ms GtG response time and has AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and is also Nvidia G-Sync compatible. This should ensure the monitor works well with both Nvidia and AMD graphics cards. OLED visuals and gaming experience Other notable features of this LG gaming monitor are its VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification, 275 nits typical and 1,300 nits peak brightness. With all this, the monitor can render deep blacks, vivid colors, and bright highlights, delivering a superior HDR viewing experience that is especially beneficial for gaming and cinematic content in low-light environments. It features an impressive 1.5M:1 contrast ratio, an anti-glare, low reflection OLED screen, has built-in speakers and DTS Headphone:X support via 4-pole headphone jack, and it has an ergonomic stand with height, tilt, swivel, and pivot adjustments. While the “bass-driven” built-in speakers are nice for a basic setup, serious gamers, who this monitor is aimed at, will likely have a more comprehensive sound setup in place anyway that outperforms what this monitor provides. In terms of connectivity, the LG UltraGear OLED has two HDMI 2.1 ports and USB Type-C (65W power delivery). The DP 2.1 ports deliver ultra-fast data speeds for high refresh rate gameplay, helping to reduce lag and get the edge in competitive games. Finally, there is another feature called Switch App that turns your screen into a multitasking hub for work, gaming, and streaming. It lets you create up to 6 sections, customize the layouts, or launch video calls with one hotkey. This allows you to easily switch between your PC and the in-built webOS streaming platform using shortcuts. Is the LG 32GX870A-B worth it? The LG UltraGear OLED definitely offers standout features that help to justify the price, namely the up to 480Hz refresh rate. Other features like VESA DisplayHDR True Black 400 certification will also make the games you play look more accurate color-wise and if you don’t already have speakers, the monitor provides a “bass-driven” speaker setup for at least decent baseline audio. If you are a serious gamer, this monitor deserves consideration given the discount, it’s also at its lowest-ever price, so you’re not paying over the odds. If you still want a good monitor, but don’t want to pay as much, check out the 27-inch model. LG UltraGear OLED 32-inch: $1,209.14 (Amazon US) / MSRP $1,399.99 LG UltraGear OLED 27-inch: $796.99 (Amazon US) / MSRP $999.99 This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The concept of ghost writers has existed for centuries; they don't get disclosed. I'm not sure this is different. In both cases the true author has agreed to do the work without being publicly credited. Don't get me wrong, I find the entire thing disgusting. Perhaps we agree but have slightly different standards for what the word "shady" means.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      fashionuae earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      fashionuae earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      elsafaacompany earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Yianis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Veteran
      Travesty went up a rank
      Veteran
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      262
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      191
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      175
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      126
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!