jmarling Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 Hello. Perhaps you can help me understand a lack of performance improvement. I have 2 computers. The first has Win2000 and Athlon XP 2500 with ATI Radeon x700 AGP video and 1 meg ram. I got a 3dmark06 score of 1350. I then buildt what I thought should be a faster computer with WinXP, ATI dual core 4200 CPU, ATI x1300 PCI-e video and 1 meg ram. But the 3dmark06 score was essentially the same at 1390. What gives? Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/ Share on other sites More sharing options...
+DKAngel Subscriber² Posted June 4, 2007 Subscriber² Share Posted June 4, 2007 try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602045 Share on other sites More sharing options...
lnmnky Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 The graphics card might be better in your old PC. version7 is better than version3 (even if it was a higher generation) Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602047 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarling Posted June 4, 2007 Author Share Posted June 4, 2007 try installing the latest ati drivers, also install the dualcore hotfix for windows xp from microsoft, and make sure uve got service pack 2 installed Yes I installed the dual core optimizer and latest ati video drivers, but 3dmarko6 was unchanged. SP2 was not yet installed. P.S. I also tried overclocking 10% but 3dmark06 only increased 1% to 1405. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602069 Share on other sites More sharing options...
lnmnky Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed. http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/131 Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602081 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarling Posted June 4, 2007 Author Share Posted June 4, 2007 The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/131 The card _is_ worse in your new pc. Lower memory clock, and less pipes and less transfer speed.http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/131 Ah, so basically the faster computer only compensated for a slower video card? Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602114 Share on other sites More sharing options...
neufuse Veteran Posted June 4, 2007 Veteran Share Posted June 4, 2007 ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff... Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602117 Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmarling Posted June 4, 2007 Author Share Posted June 4, 2007 ugh i hate ATI's number scheme... they make you think the higher the number the better/newer... kinda like nvidia's 7300 isnt as goot as a 6800 stuff... Since the ATI x1300 card apparentluy isn't so good, can you recommend a good video card under $100? Thanks in advance Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602137 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darksoft Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 swap cards and install sp2? Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602156 Share on other sites More sharing options...
NienorGT Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 The video card is something like >85% of the score. The x700 don't have Shader Model 3.0 so it don't pass all the tests A card under $100? A 8500GT maybe. Still, it won't super perform. But I think you will get 2000. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602167 Share on other sites More sharing options...
+Fulcrum Subscriber¹ Posted June 4, 2007 Subscriber¹ Share Posted June 4, 2007 a 7900GT might be had for $100, or a 7900GS, I get about 5600-5800 3D Marks with a very similar processor (2.5ghz), but I also have 2GB memory. found one a GS for 106 after rebate including shipping. http://shop4.outpost.com/product/4970851 Dont Hate kuz I post rebate deals, they're hot if they're hot and meet or exceed your needs :) Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602209 Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Frylock Posted June 4, 2007 Share Posted June 4, 2007 It could be that 1 meg ram :p ATI x1300 PCI-e video and 1 meg ram. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588602989 Share on other sites More sharing options...
chconline Veteran Posted June 4, 2007 Veteran Share Posted June 4, 2007 Yeah and his "ATI dual core 4200" processor. Like obviously ATI bought AMD back in July right? :p Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588603015 Share on other sites More sharing options...
sundayx Veteran Posted June 4, 2007 Veteran Share Posted June 4, 2007 Another fooled by video card numbering schemes. Link to comment https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/565016-faster-computer-but-3dmark06-not-better/#findComment-588603035 Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts