Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Something the Windows-fanboys can feel upset over:

Mac OS X Leopard Generic PC icon

picture2vu4.png

:laugh:

is that for real?? that is the PC icon on Leopard? Hilarious!

anyway - I went back to the Mac store in Schaumburg last night and played with them some more. I couldn't believe how slow they were... these are brand new iMacs and Mac Books. I opened iPhoto for instance and it took forever to come up. If you click around too fast while things are loading the back ground dims out and things seem to freeze up momentarily. also seems very laggy when trying to resize and move around apps. this happened on all but the Mac Pro towers with a ton of RAM. what kind of video do these things have?? maybe they can't properly power those giant displays? now i don't feel so bad about Vista seeming laggy at times... apparently that plagues the competition as well. not that I had a chance to play for long - this was just my first impression after about 20 minutes on 4 different Macs.

is that for real?? that is the PC icon on Leopard? Hilarious!

Yup it's the real thing. :p

anyway - I went back to the Mac store in Schaumburg last night and played with them some more. I couldn't believe how slow they were... these are brand new iMacs and Mac Books. I opened iPhoto for instance and it took forever to come up. If you click around too fast while things are loading the back ground dims out and things seem to freeze up momentarily. also seems very laggy when trying to resize and move around apps. this happened on all but the Mac Pro towers with a ton of RAM. what kind of video do these things have?? maybe they can't properly power those giant displays? now i don't feel so bad about Vista seeming laggy at times... apparently that plagues the competition as well. not that I had a chance to play for long - this was just my first impression after about 20 minutes on 4 different Macs.

Well they really shouldn't be that slow. My school bought a whole range of new C2D iMacs and they load my entire iPhoto Library in no time at all (I have it backed up to my Flash drive). Maybe those people there just don't know how to maintain their Macs properly or they just don't bother to.

Yup it's the real thing. :p

Well they really shouldn't be that slow. My school bought a whole range of new C2D iMacs and they load my entire iPhoto Library in no time at all (I have it backed up to my Flash drive). Maybe those people there just don't know how to maintain their Macs properly or they just don't bother to.

Could be. I couldn't really tell how much stuff was running either... I assume alot of people open stuff and then minimize it - and it goes to the dock and stays there. The demo machines had quite a few photos on them - but nothing that should cause lag. I did notice Finder was quite fast. The unresponsiveness if you try to click around faster than you ought to was rather annoying... not sure if that happens on all macs or not. i do find it funny that i've seen a few mac books in use around like at church and in libraries and all that I've seen were running Windows XP!

Oh man, those folder icons are hideous, since when did Apple outsource its design team to Redmond. Looks like Leopard will be requiring a face lift on day 1.

Those folder icons remind me of a set I've seen on Iconfactory before, but I can't remember the name of the set right now. When I have more time I will try to find it.

Those folder icons remind me of a set I've seen on Iconfactory before, but I can't remember the name of the set right now. When I have more time I will try to find it.

Agua?

I kinda think just the opposite. These new icons are beautiful. I hate Vista's icons with a passion (glossy to the max).

+1

I hate the Windows Vista folders as well. Especially those glossy-puke-colored User folders. :x

itunes is the biggest joke ever, you have no idea how Infuriating it is to try to add music onto it, couldnt you SIMPLY just add single mp3's on, NO you have to put them into a special folder and all sorts of gay things happen, why couldnt you simply drag and drop.

This made me LOL for some reason.

Could be. I couldn't really tell how much stuff was running either... I assume alot of people open stuff and then minimize it - and it goes to the dock and stays there.

You can tell by the little black triangles under the icons in the Dock. If there is a triangle under it, the app is running. Most Macs that I'd see in CompUSA (well, before the one near me closed recently) have most of the iLife apps running, along with pretty much everything else in the Dock. No wonder they run slow. Most people not familiar with Macs tend to just click the red bubble to close the apps, not realizing that this (in most cases) just closes the window, but doesn't close the app itself. Hell, my wife has been using OS X for several years now and she still does that with Safari all the time.

.Neo, do you have the WWDC Leopard beta? Is that where you're getting all the high-quality new icons? They are alright, certainly better than the default icons in OS X 10.0-.4, but I like the default Vista icons better, myself. I can only hope CandyBar is quickly updated for Leopard, looks like I'll continue with the AquaBlend icon pack, those have the best folder icons I've ever seen, in my opinion.

Yeah, Wired just removed some of the images of iCal, although it is pretty much identical to iCal in some of the older Leopard builds.

Anyway, what's the deal with the Aqua scroll bars? iTunes 7 doesn't have them, Cover Flow doesn't have them, why isn't Apple being consistent and going with the iTunes 7 flat scroll bar?

Yeah, Wired just removed some of the images of iCal, although it is pretty much identical to iCal in some of the older Leopard builds.

Anyway, what's the deal with the Aqua scroll bars? iTunes 7 doesn't have them, Cover Flow doesn't have them, why isn't Apple being consistent and going with the iTunes 7 flat scroll bar?

To me that the worst thing they have done. Change the Aqua scrollbar in iTunes and the toolbar buttons on Leopard are not nice. Thank god there is UNO. :D

You might want to remove the iCal + screensaver shots Giga, we don't want Apple legal coming after us.

Radish™

I honestly don't see why Apple would request them to be removed if there are screens of Arabesque and the other screens from previous builds all over the web. (same for iCal).

I honestly don't see why Apple would request them to be removed if there are screens of Arabesque and the other screens from previous builds all over the web. (same for iCal).

It's because we are a major tech website, not someone's blog or Flickr account (which is harder to track down). And Apple employees read the forums.

Radish?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!