Apple's "New" GUI  

725 members have voted

  1. 1. Yay or Nay?

    • Kicks Ass!
      294
    • Meh, Who Cares?
      249
    • Utter Piece of Garbage
      182


Recommended Posts

Nope they're normal .icns files. The only new thing is that they hold two new sizes: 256x256 Pixels and 512x512 pixels. Unfortunately there's no way to view those two on Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, not even with Preview. :/

Cool, it's nice to see Leopard supporting giant icons, just like in Vista. That means even higher resolution icons can be made that will look good at any size. Like I said, they have the same thing in Vista, but it seems no one takes advantage of it, they still make ugly small icons.

Ah, thanks for the info.

I think the only thing you'd be able to open the icons with on Tiger is IconBuilder & IconExaminer (comes with IconBuilder), but that would only be to view & edit them. As you say you couldn't use them at the larger sizes on there.

IconExaminer won't display those large sizes either.

Cool, it's nice to see Leopard supporting giant icons, just like in Vista. That means even higher resolution icons can be made that will look good at any size. Like I said, they have the same thing in Vista, but it seems no one takes advantage of it, they still make ugly small icons.

That has always been Windows' problem. Many don't really bother using the latest technologies. It took years before most developers finally started using 32-bit alpha channel icons at 48x48 pixels for Windows XP. And even today you still have a lot of apps that carry icons that won't top 32x32 pixels at 24-bit. It's basically the exact opposite on Mac OS X.

Edited by .Neo
The folder icons look pretty nice, as if they were made from real paper. (Y)

iconszu4.png

Why are the folders now different colours? System and User maybe? That is so Windows Vista. :rolleyes:

Why are the folders now different colours? System and User maybe? That is so Windows Vista. :rolleyes:

And that doesn't make it bad :rofl: But seriously, maybe Apple is doing separate icons for both Aqua and Graphite?

The problem with the spaces icon is that it has too much details for nothing. Maybe if it was 1024x1024, it'd be nice, but at these sizes, never.

Just a fancy grid would be fine IMO. No need to add 4 wallpapers and application windows.

You're forgetting the fact that Mac OS X Leopard supports icons up to 512x512 pixels. What you're describing might be nice for 32x32 pixel icons back in the Mac OS 9 erra, but it won't really work for Mac OS X Leopard. Most of proper Mac OS X-styled icons are filled with details, just take a look at Safari, Mail and Keynote (to name three).

Yea, the Spaces icon looks really poor. Might look OK at larger sizes but in the dock (where it'll be seen the most) it just looks rushed, & not up to their usual standards.

I'm not too bothered though. I guess you'll be able to remove it from the dock & just use the hotkey which is what I'll do.

But even at 512x512, there's too many details that don't appear on the icon and that should.

I take it you've never seen the Spaces icon at 512x512 pixels?

It's as if they shrinked a whole desktop to fit 4 times in a 512x512 icon... I don't know... personally, I think that there's just something wrong with that.

Seems to me you miss the point of having such large icons. They're not meant to be used at 72 dpi, they come in handy when enabling the resolution independent UI. Which stands for having incredibly detailed interfaces without the need of having insanely large displays as well.

Of course, none of it changes the fact that both the Spaces and Expos? icons of Leopard look really poor. But it has (IMO at least) nothing to do with the level of detail, just the overal design.

Safari @ 512x512 pixels:

picture1jq7qo8.png

Edited by .Neo

One thing I HATE about this new UI is the menu bar at the top, it looks absolutely disgusting.

The new finder looks REALLY nice though, not sure on the dock however.

I find Tiger to be perfect, I Love it. Not sure about Leopard though :( I guess I'll have to wait for it to come out to truely find out. As will most of us here.

Yea, the Spaces icon looks really poor. Might look OK at larger sizes but in the dock (where it'll be seen the most) it just looks rushed, & not up to their usual standards.

I'm not too bothered though. I guess you'll be able to remove it from the dock & just use the hotkey which is what I'll do.

I agree is looks rushed. I think the icon doesnt look that good because if the poor use of lighting effects. With better lighting effect it would look better IMO

...I don't get it. It looks the same to me with a few minor changes. I don't get what all the hype is about. From that one image that was posted at the beginning of this topic, it just looks like Tiger with a few minor changes. Apple's going to make people pay an obscene amount of money for an operating system that's not a whole heck of a lot different than Tiger? To me, that's almost like the move from Win95 to Win98SE. Not much difference (and yes, I did watch the previews...), but same amount of $$ shelled out for it...

Has anyone else noticed how Apple has seemed to be ****ing more and more people off lately, and becoming more aggressive as a company, or is it just me? :unsure:

...I don't get it. It looks the same to me with a few minor changes. I don't get what all the hype is about. From that one image that was posted at the beginning of this topic, it just looks like Tiger with a few minor changes. Apple's going to make people pay an obscene amount of money for an operating system that's not a whole heck of a lot different than Tiger? To me, that's almost like the move from Win95 to Win98SE. Not much difference (and yes, I did watch the previews...), but same amount of $$ shelled out for it...

Look harder.

...I don't get it. It looks the same to me with a few minor changes. I don't get what all the hype is about. From that one image that was posted at the beginning of this topic, it just looks like Tiger with a few minor changes. Apple's going to make people pay an obscene amount of money for an operating system that's not a whole heck of a lot different than Tiger? To me, that's almost like the move from Win95 to Win98SE. Not much difference (and yes, I did watch the previews...), but same amount of $$ shelled out for it...

Has anyone else noticed how Apple has seemed to be ****ing more and more people off lately, and becoming more aggressive as a company, or is it just me? :unsure:

:|

No comment... no, seriously, no comment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
    • After I installed KB5095093, the volume on my ARM laptop won't go above 20%. It's stuck on the hearing protection level, which is pretty much useless if you want to listen to anything. I rolled back.
    • Amazon Prime Day slashes Samsung's newest Galaxy Watch Ultra by 45 percent by Karthik Mudaliar Samsung’s flagship Android smartwatch has received one of its steepest Prime Day cuts. Amazon has dropped the 2025 Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra in Titanium Blue to $357.24, saving buyers around $292 from its $649.99 list price. That's a 45 percent discount (purchase link below). The 47mm Galaxy Watch Ultra uses a titanium casing and a 1.5-inch Super AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 and peak brightness of 3,000 nits. It includes LTE connectivity, Bluetooth 5.3, Wi-Fi, NFC, and dual-frequency L1+L5 GPS for more accurate outdoor route tracking. The 2025 model has 64GB of storage, a 590mAh battery, sapphire crystal glass, 10ATM water resistance, IP68 protection, and MIL-STD-810H durability testing. Its health and fitness tools include heart rate monitoring, sleep coaching, Energy Score, Running Coach, body composition analysis, temperature sensing, and ECG support, where available. This model is best suited to Android users who regularly run, hike, cycle, or train outdoors and want cellular access without carrying a phone. The larger battery, rugged construction, bright display, and dedicated Quick Button also make it a stronger option than Samsung’s regular Galaxy Watch models for extended workouts and demanding environments. Grab the Titanium Blue Galaxy Watch Ultra before the Prime Day price resets: Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra (2025) [Sold and Shipped by Amazon] Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Google begins rolling out its post-Epic Play Store billing model next week by Karthik Mudaliar Google has confirmed that its redesigned Play Store billing and fee structure will take effect on June 30, 2026, in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Economic Area. The changes will let eligible developers offer their own payment systems or send users to an external website for purchases, while separating Google’s platform service fee from the cost of using Google Play Billing. The rollout puts concrete dates and detailed rate cards behind the broader Android policy overhaul Google announced in March. That announcement followed a proposed settlement with Epic Games intended to resolve their long-running disputes over app distribution and payments, although the U.S. portion of the agreement still requires court approval. Under the new billing choice program, developers selling digital content or services can display an alternative payment option alongside Google Play Billing. They may also direct users to their own websites to complete a purchase. Developers can use Google’s standard payment-choice screen or design one that complies with the company’s user-interface rules. Choosing another payment processor does not eliminate Google’s cut altogether. The company will continue charging a service fee for transactions associated with apps distributed through Google Play, regardless of whether payment is handled by Google, an alternative provider, or a developer’s website. Google argues that this fee covers the value and infrastructure provided by Android and the Play Store. For developers earning up to $1 million annually, the service fee will generally be 10 percent. That rate also applies to auto-renewing subscriptions. When Google Play Billing is used in the U.S., U.K., or EEA, Google will add a separate 5 percent billing fee, and developers processing payments elsewhere will not pay that additional charge. This means Google’s familiar flat 30 percent commission is disappearing, but developers will not necessarily see a dramatic reduction on every transaction. An in-app purchase from an existing user processed through Google Play Billing can still reach a combined 30 percent. The biggest savings are likely to come from subscriptions, smaller developers covered by the $1 million tier, and companies able to move customers to their own payment infrastructure. Google is also offering lower rates through its Apps Experience and revamped Games Level Up programs. Apps and games that satisfy the company’s requirements can qualify for 15 percent service fees on new-install transactions and 20 percent on existing-install transactions. The criteria include performance and reliability standards, support for additional Android device categories, and selected platform features. Those program rates are scheduled to become available in the initial markets and Australia on September 30. For consumers, the immediate effect will depend on whether developers adopt alternative payments and pass any savings on through lower prices. For developers, however, June 30 begins a more flexible but considerably more complicated Play Store economy in which distribution, billing, install dates, revenue thresholds, and program participation can each affect Google’s final cut. Google is also separately developing a Registered App Stores program designed to simplify the installation of qualifying third-party stores. That initiative is expected to arrive with a major Android release later in 2026 and will launch outside the U.S. first. Google says the rest of the world will receive the changes by September 30, 2027, although billing rates for markets outside the US, UK, and EEA have not yet been announced.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!