Recommended Posts

Hi dawxxx nice beta foobar config :) Just got a quick suggestion, for your foobar 1.04 why don't you just add some of the features from iAVA to fooAVA? I really like the white skin from iAVA so could you please add this skin to your new version of fooAVA?

hello,

another experiment, is i?m reinstall from zero all foobar, and FooAva 1.04 B3, with Panels Ui. 0.14.12 B (this fooAVA dont work with PUI 0.14.9),

and i?m upload screenshot, with same cleartype proble:D:D. but font not render bad, it?s more sharp,

I?M KEEP with this last beta configuration, is awesome!.

Greetings for all

post-124718-1194636983_thumb.png

Edited by calo

About v1.04 beta c. This is what I've found so far... good and bad points (just my experience in my rig).

+no restart need after background change (except when dark background mode selected)

+faster startup/shutdown

+cute settings menu.

+more options to change on settings menu.

+beautiful layout (CD for album art, nice buttons, and progress bar, etc.)

+excellent mini-player mode!

-bug when "dark background selected":

back01ff6.png

this happens even after restarting the application.

-when playlist menu is clicked and you move the mouse away, the submenu splits and only half of it is shown. (disregard this, it only happened once and never again.)

-no more "next song" (it was a nice feature).

Overall it's a very nice update and very much worthed the wait. Keep it up! :)

where did you guys all get the beta versions? i couldnt find any dl links in this or the other topics (and neither on daxxxx666s homepage)...

should i recheck my eyesight or is it a 'closed beta' only?

i really love this config and seeing all the progress, i cant wait to get the new version :D

great work, dawxxx666!

regarding the 'next track': it only ever worked correctly in normal playback mode; and if you needed to know what song's next you could just look at the playlist. but you could make a button to hide or display it in the config window.

-no more "next song" (it was a nice feature).

I disagree. You can always see in the playlist panel what the next song will be. And as for me, I always listen to music with shuffle option on, so "next song" was just irritating. :)

Am I the only who has this error? The cover in Album Art mode is too big

68347Clip_2.jpg

Hi dawxxx666. First of all, fantastic work on your version of foobar! I'm completely new to foobar, and as soon as someone linked me to your skin I jumped right on it. The default foobar interface is ugly as anything and probably would've turned me off foobar altogether, as I would never have been able to create foobars like the ones I've seen around the net.

I've spent about 4 straight days finding my way around foobar, making it work how I would like it to and also manually adding albums into my library. I previously used iTunes 7, I have ~5000 songs but most of them are horrible quality (<192kbps) so I'm adding the ones that are good quality into foobar, complete with proper foldername, tagging and album art. It's arduous bit it'll be much worth it in the long run!

I thought I'd just post a few small customization hints for other users:

Enable system tray notification; I know this is already in there but it took me a while to find it

File>Preferences>PanelsUI>Edit Layout

Scroll right to the bottom and uncomment the line beginning with $settray

Ignore leading "the" in artist sorting;

This is a biggie. I get massively annoyed when I just end up with a clump of "The" artists 3/4 of the way down my library. Alright, to do this in the Library Filter, go to

File>Preferences>PanelsUI-Library Filter

Select artist from the dropdown box, click on the second line which reads

$replace(%artist%,', ',|)

and add a function at the end, so it now reads

$replace(%artist%,', ',|%artist%,'The ',)

This will cause the filter to blank all occurences of 'The ' when sorting, yet still have the full artist name appear in the display. I haven't done this in Album List, but I assume the process is pretty much the same.

Now for the main track list window! (I'm pretty proud that I figured this one out, being 4 days new to foobar :D)

File>Preferences>PanelsUI-Sort/Group

Select Artist, choose modify. Now you should see this code at the top

$if($get(%album artist%),

Or something to that effect (I forgot if it was album artist or just artist or whatever, doesn't matter anyway)

Now add some code above that to make it look like this:

$put(sortartist,$replace(%album artist%,'The ',))

$if($get(sortartist),

The takes the album artist variable, blanks the 'The ' if there is one, then stores it in the variable sortartist, which is then used to sort the aritsts. The rest of the code in that box should remain untouched btw.

That's it, just save it and restart foobar if needed :D Of course if you wanted to, you could nullify other phrases like 'A ' (so 'A Perfect Circle' would sort as if it were 'Perfect Circle') etc and you could also use this same method to sort albums the same way.

Alright, and just a quick question if someone else could help me out here:

Is there any way to maximize the foobar window? Like, in every other application you click the middle button of the top-right corner three and it either makes the window smaller, or maximizes it to the entire screen. With foobar, it makes it a miniplayer or makes it about a half-sized window compared to my screen, why is that? Surely there is some code I could change to make it restore to the full size of my screen (1024x768) apart from the toolbar.

Also, I'm working on how to make library view default to the expanded Artists view, and also how to stop that view expanding the tree all the way down to tracks (because that's just pointless IMO)

Thanks and keep up the great work! :woot:

Alright, and just a quick question if someone else could help me out here:

Is there any way to maximize the foobar window? Like, in every other application you click the middle button of the top-right corner three and it either makes the window smaller, or maximizes it to the entire screen. With foobar, it makes it a miniplayer or makes it about a half-sized window compared to my screen, why is that? Surely there is some code I could change to make it restore to the full size of my screen (1024x768) apart from the toolbar.

3 options:

You can edit the values of window size of those existing buttons, (look for "WINDOWSIZE" in the main prefs somewhere under //Mini player.)

Somehow, add an additional button. (I would look at the code of the existing buttons, copy it, move it around, and edit the function of the button.)

Or you can just unhide your titlebar and maximize the window.

There's a time limit for editing posts at his forum, I forgot the exact times.

Hey dawxxx666 or anyone else who can fix this, I have a problem with this part of my Foo config and I'm sure you guys ran across this problem too.

I was trying to fix it, but I failed : [

minimodepx0.jpg

I don't like how that activelist overlaps my buttons. It sometimes makes my foo crash when I click on the wrong place to try to meximize again. I tried to truncate the activelist name, but couldn't make the "next" and "previous" playlist buttons to follow correctly.

Please help!

There's a time limit for editing posts at his forum, I forgot the exact times.

Hey dawxxx666 or anyone else who can fix this, I have a problem with this part of my Foo config and I'm sure you guys ran across this problem too.

I was trying to fix it, but I failed : [

minimodepx0.jpg

I don't like how that activelist overlaps my buttons. It sometimes makes my foo crash when I click on the wrong place to try to meximize again. I tried to truncate the activelist name, but couldn't make the "next" and "previous" playlist buttons to follow correctly.

Please help!

Good news: it's already fixed in 1.04, even fonts are displayed correctly ;)

dawxxx666 could you please add the playcount via foo_custominfo.dll ?

The original one changes tags of the files :(

In new version I'm using foo_playback_custom.dll - no problems with tags any more :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!