Microsoft paid $50 MILLION for GTA IV Downloadable Content


Recommended Posts

Microsoft paid $50 MILLION for GTA IV Downloadable Content

From a conference call held with Take 2's CFO last week: "The first 25 million is for the first episodic content package that ?s supposed to go out and that is in March of ?08. That?s why it moved into current because it?s in the next 12 months. The second 25 will be for the second episodic, the episode, and that will be later in fiscal ?08."

SOURCE

That's a bit much for just extra content. That's like the budget for 2 full games. Is the average consumer going to even know about the DLC? The first episode won't be available until months after the launch, so how are they going to advertise it as something extra over the PS3 version? I don't buy DLC, so this wouldn't sway me, although I was going to get the 360 version anyway.

I wonder what the length of the episodic content will be.

Damn, so GTA IV will take a year to beat!

Let's up hope the "episodic content" is, in fact, episodic content. Not just some new clothes or items.

Iam guessing it's intirely new areas or story missions. They have already said it's not just a new car or weapon.

That's a bit much for just extra content. That's like the budget for 2 full games. Is the average consumer going to even know about the DLC? The first episode won't be available until months after the launch, so how are they going to advertise it as something extra over the PS3 version? I don't buy DLC, so this wouldn't sway me, although I was going to get the 360 version anyway.

I wonder what the length of the episodic content will be.

Well I am guessing this could be a big selling point of Xbox Live. I am not sure but I think you actually have to have a gold account to be able to buy stuff on XBL??

That's a bit much for just extra content. That's like the budget for 2 full games. Is the average consumer going to even know about the DLC? The first episode won't be available until months after the launch, so how are they going to advertise it as something extra over the PS3 version? I don't buy DLC, so this wouldn't sway me, although I was going to get the 360 version anyway.

I wonder what the length of the episodic content will be.

It's a move to boost console sales, not games. The game itself will sell regardless of there being episodic content or not and those not wanting the game wont buy it because theres two addons that will also cost them money. What having the content will do but is act as an incentive to those on fence undecided whether to get a PS3 or Xbox. The GTA series is a console seller, for many people more so than Halo of GOW, so it makes sense for MS to have a more attractive version of the game feature wise for fans to compell them to buy the 360.

The problem as I see it but is they are really going to have to hammer home the fact that this version will have exclusive addons due to the fact the addons wont be arriving until post Xmas. People are going to be buying consoles to play this over Xmas and if they are oblivious to the fact there will be exclusive addons many may go the PS3 way where they otherwise would have gotten a 360.

Someone mentioned XBox live too. The fact the game is multiplayer enabled will mean you need a gold account to play online. The content can be gotten on silver but it still may have the effect of boosting gold subscriptions if the game is able to get people buying 360's just to play this and then they in turn want to play online.

This is good news for 360 owners! Personally I other than trying to boost console sales, I think MS is using this as an extra incentive to get XBL, and they make big money there.

Think what they must have payed to sway them away from PS3 exclusivity in the first place. I would say it cost MS close to $100 million to get it on the 360 plus the exclusive content.

Maybe but maybe not. It could be more to do with what Sony DIDNT (and I dont just mean monetry wise) offer them than what MS did. MS has alot more consoles on the market now so developing a game for the xbox makes more sense as you have a larger reach. The past few releases were timed exclusives, all ended up on the Xbox at some point but with the PS2's sales figures and any incentives Sony had offered that was a good choice. This time Sony could offer them money but with that many few consoles on the market Rockstar are probably better off just getting the game on the console than they are releasing it in 18 months when people wont really care anymore.

Also if they wait they run the risk of letting other companies take a part of the market that they used to dominate. Now days the 360 has saints row and crackdown and if they spawned sequals and were quality people may not even care about GTA if it gets released 18 months late due to an exclusivness offer. By then the game might be seen as an old PS3 port and people will go towards the newer alternatives.

Edited by Smigit

Who knows what Sony pays for it's exclusive 3rd party games. Or what MS pays for its games to, that's just the price of business. The fact we're actually getting a number ammount for the first time for one of these deals seems to be making a big fuss.

You'll just have to wait and see how big the episodic content is, if it's like 5-6 new story missions, with new voice audio and so on, then it's worth the cost to make. And that's how I think it'll be, think HL2 episodes, which is why it takes long to bring them out. GTA is the perfect type of game to have this episodic model used for it. I can't wait to see what they do.

It's a move to boost console sales, not games.

Maybe, but I don't think it's the most effective way of doing that. A price drop would boost console sales much more than some DLC. Main problem is though, most people who buy GTA don't even know about this extra DLC. They'll need to advertise it.

Maybe, but I don't think it's the most effective way of doing that. A price drop would boost console sales much more than some DLC. Main problem is though, most people who buy GTA don't even know about this extra DLC. They'll need to advertise it.

Uhh, you're talking about Microsoft here, I'm sure they've thought of that and I'm sure they have a marketing strategy. The game doens't come out for another 4 months - they have time.

-Spenser

This is good news for 360 owners! Personally I other than trying to boost console sales, I think MS is using this as an extra incentive to get XBL, and they make big money there.

If MS makes big money with XBL using this exclusivity, then its NOT good news for 360 owners :laugh:

It doesn't make me feel good since we'll be paying for this.

I guess they'll find creative ways to get more money out of us.

Uhh, you're talking about Microsoft here, I'm sure they've thought of that and I'm sure they have a marketing strategy. The game doens't come out for another 4 months - they have time.

Well their marketing hasn't always worked, it depends on whether consumers want to pay $40-$60 on DLC for 1 game. Either way, Rockstar sure is going to make a load of money from GTA4. I wonder when we'll see the next GTA after this one.

If MS makes big money with XBL using this exclusivity, then its NOT good news for 360 owners :laugh:

It doesn't make me feel good since we'll be paying for this.

I guess they'll find creative ways to get more money out of us.

i agree, and i think that's the problem with all this exclusivity stuff. ms is paying so much to get these exclusive deals, and sure they have bottomless pockets, but they're going to try to make the money back through the consumers. as an example, have you guys seen the special bundle for ace combat 6? the flight sticks are awesome, but the whole bundle will cost $150! someone please try to justify that :pinch:

i guess my point is...don't expect these downloadable episodes to come cheap :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!