• 0

FLOAT and DOUBLE in Visual Studio is garbage?


Question

I am having some problems with visual studio 2005 professional,

I am declaring a simple double to 0.7 but in runtime it is 0.699999999999996 which is not CLOSE ENOUGH precision for my program...

I was wondering if this is a normal thing, or is it a bug in visual studio or is my hardware broken...?

check the image for a break/debug right after a few doubles have been allocated, you can see my code and you can see whats in mem..

the following info is to try and give a bigger picture of my system:

OS Name Microsoft? Windows Vista? Ultimate

Version 6.0.6000 Build 6000

System Manufacturer FUJITSU SIEMENS

System Model Amilo Mx43y Series

System Type X86-based PC

Processor Intel® Pentium® M processor 1.73GHz, 1733 Mhz, 1 Core(s), 1 Logical Processor(s)

BIOS Version/Date American Megatrends Inc. 1.10C, 05/10/2005

SMBIOS Version 2.3

Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "6.0.6000.16386"

Total Physical Memory 2,046.81 MB

Microsoft Visual Studio 2005

Version 8.0.50727.867 (vsvista.050727-8600)

Microsoft .NET Framework

Version 2.0.50727

Installed Edition: Professional

Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 77626-009-0000007-41812

Microsoft Visual C++ 2005

Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition - ENU Service Pack 1 (KB926601)

Update for Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Professional Edition - ENU (KB932232)

post-2527-1183128508_thumb.jpg

14 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Uh. I recommend reading up on the differences between basic data types....If you need absolutely perfect precision, you'll need some kind of BCD-type to store your numbers.

A double is a 64bit floating point number, which is only accurate to like 18ish (Maybe less?) decimal points. After that it does some rounding.

Also, you're programming in c++, Visual Studio is just an IDE, and kinda irrelevent to the question. (Just a tip)

Anyway.

Try using a long double.

Edited by MioTheGreat
  • 0
  noroom said:
That's what Double.Epsilon is for.

That's .NET.

Anyway, I take back what I said above, a long double and a double are the same thing w/ msvc++. They don't have extended precision doubles (Apparently, according to an MSDN blog, it might come in VC9).

You'll have to roll your own or find a sample online with a higher precision float, or a BCD (Which would be slower than the other option, but much more precise)

  • 0

in this case I just needed 0.7 as a nice number, when I saw that it wasnt what I specified I got worried that something might be broken somewhere, I remember reading about how NASA couldnt use the pentium cpu because it calculated numbers wrong... so I got a bit worried.. ;)

thanks for your replies, it really helped me to understand how things work. still I find it weird that I specify 0.7 but it doesnt store it like that...

I tried the same thing in C# and 0.7 is 0.7 in there...

  • 0

Yeah, this one is easy to understand. In fact, it happens very often and very easily if you aren't careful.

What's going on? Consider the value 0.5. That is easily representable in binary because binary uses powers of two. In the case of fractional parts, it works the same way as in decimal:

0.5 = 5 * 10^(-1) = 5 * 1/10 = 5/10 = 1/2

0.1b = 1 * 2^(-1) = 1 * 1/2 = 1/2

Obviously, for negative powers of 2, it is easy to store:

0.25 = 2 * 10^(-1) + 5 * 10^(-2) = 2/10 + 5/100 = 20/100 + 5/100 = 25/100 = 1/4

0.01b = 0 * 2^(-1) + 1 * 2^(-2) = 0 + 1 * 1/4 = 0 + 1/4 = 1/4

However, what about 1/5 (0.2)?

0.2 = 2 * 10^(-1) = 2 * 1/10 = 2/10 = 1/5

0.00110011...b = 1 * 2^(-3) + 1 * 2^(-4) + 1 * 2^(-7) + 1 * 2^(-8) + .... = 1/5

As you can see, unlike in decimal, 1/5 written in binary is a repeating value, just as 1/3 is in decimal.

You are also probably wondering how I got that value, right? The method that I've found easiest to understand is displayed here:

 x = 1 / 5
 y = "."

 x = x * 2 //multiply the value by the number base
 If x >= 1.0 Then // if x > 1 then
	 x = x - 1.0  // subtract 1 from x
	 y = y + "1" // and add a form of "carry" to a string containing the binary
 Else
	 y = y + "0"
 End If
 // repeat the multiplication process until x = 0
 // or until you find a recognizable repetition in y
 // or until the string exceeds the precision of the data type you are using

To illustrate, I'll use 1/5 as an example as if the above pseudocode actually ran and the comment about repeating the multiplication was implemented as some form of loop already:

1/5 * 2 = 2/5

2/5 >= 1 ?? No - ".0"

2/5 * 2 = 4/5

4/5 >= 1 ? No - ".00"

4/5 * 2 = 8/5

8/5 >= 1 ? Yes - ".001" // 8/5 - 1 = 3/5

3/5 * 2 = 6/5

6/5 >= 1 ? Yes - ".0011" // 6/5 - 1 = 1/5

We're back to 1/5, which is obviously where we started. Therefore, we can deduce that 1/5 repeats the 0011 combination.

Note that the above method actually works for any base:

// Hexadecimal

1/5 * 16 = 16/5

16/5 >= 1 ? Yes - ".3" // 16/5 - int(16/5) = 1/5

Since 1/5 ended up being 1/5 again, we have no need for testing again because we know that it will end up being the same thing. But why the .3 this time? Simply put, when you integer divide 16 by 5, you get 3. That value is the value that you need to use for the decimal. Also note the following way to check:

every group of 4 binary digits (bits) is equal to one hexadecimal digit (sometimes known as a hexit or hex bit). In other words, look at the following from the example:

.00110011

notice the 1s? Split them up!

. 0011 0011

Now convert them to hexadecimal:

. 3 3

The result for each group is 3, just like when the hexadecimal conversion was done.

This is probably confusing to you now. However, if you practice the conversion a couple of times, it is not that difficult.

Just remember that you check to see if the fraction is greater than or equal to 1 since the fraction should be less than 1 (if it is more than one, only part of the value is a fraction ;)). If it is greater than or equal to 1, you need to subtract the integer part of the value and you also need to add the integer part of the value to a string containing the values to give you your fraction in whatever base you want. Otherwise, you add a 0 to that string.

  • 0

Try this out:

http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/decnumb...usplus/download

Or, you can switch over to Managed C++ and use the System.Decimal class which is built in. (You might be using managed c++ for all I know, I can't tell based on what you've told us)

Edited by MioTheGreat
  • 0

You could also try using GMP (the GNU Multi-Precision library). There is a static build and a dynamic build for Visual C++ here as well as the source code to GMP and patches for the source code apparently -

http://cs.nyu.edu/exact/core/gmp/

Using System.Decimal would probably be the best solution since it should be a relatively similar syntax (rather than learning a whole new language by using a 3rd-party library).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Minecraft Chase the Skies update and Vibrant Visuals graphics overhaul lands next week by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The second major game update of the year for Minecraft is almost here. Mojang today announced that its next Game Drop, Chase the Skies, is landing on June 17. Alongside it, the highly anticipated graphics overhaul, dubbed Vibrant Visuals, will be available too, making the day a rather big occasion for Minecraft fans. The Chase the Skies update has a large number of gameplay features and content, but one of the biggest is the expansion of the Ghast. Now, players will be able to find Happy Ghasts as a tameable mob, letting up to five players ride them on journeys across the skies. To get one, players will have to find small, dehydrated Ghasts near fossil structures in the Nether, then bring it to the overworld and feed it plenty of water. It is also possible to craft dried Ghasts from Nether materials. Other features of this update include a handy player locator bar, better leads functionality, craftable saddles, a new music disc, and more. As for the Vibrant Visuals upgrade, Mojang is touting a visual refresh that lets players witness how lights and shadows affect the Minecraft world. "Fly high with your happy ghast to watch the sunrise reflect on the rippling ocean, make art with shifting shadows, descend into dark depths, or simply sit back and enjoy the vivid beauty of each biome," says the studio. "With updated in-game visuals you’ll see how light and shadow transform the Overworld – water reflects, forests become shaded, fog drifts, and waterfalls glimmer in the light." The currently supported devices for Vibrant Visuals include Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PlayStation 4, PlayStation 5, PC, as well as Android (Android: Adreno 640, Mali-G68, Mali-G77, or Xclipse 530 or higher) and iOS (A12 or M1 or higher.)   Unfortunately, the Vibrant Visuals upgrade will only be available on the Bedrock Edition of Minecraft, at least for now. Mojang has said that it plans to bring the visual overhaul to the Java Edition of Minecraft at a later date, but no information or release window has been announced just yet.
    • Once people get use to the square-ish case, they'll probably switch the display to square as well.
    • Why would you think it's not enabled all the time? Because they said so?
    • $100 billion of the $200 billion is in N.Y. State over the upcoming 20 years plus. Obviously 20+ year spending plans are subject to change.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      POR2GAL4EVER earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Orpheus13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      serfegyed earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      560
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      255
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      163
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      158
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      110
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!