• 0

Linking Notepad++ to run a compiler on F5?


Question

For college purposes, I need a quick, and light C IDE. Been using DevC++, since it's easy enough to create a new source file, enter code, and compile, without the need for creating projects, dependencies etc.

Problem with DevC++ is that the editor has some pretty bad highlighting and options. Notepad++ is miles ahead.

Now, I found that Notepad++ has options to run an external program, with arguments, when pressing F5, explained on the following link: http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/run-HOWTO.php

Could anyone tell me how exactly to do that, and to which file? DevC++ is based on GCC, so it has gcc.exe in its root folder.

In lixux, the gcc syntax is, if I remember correctly:

gcc inputname.c -o outputname

Anyway, to sum it up, I would need the following: When you press F5, n++ calls GCC, and compiles and runs a new file, with its filename the same as the source code filename.

Thanx in advance :)

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

yes it possible, but with plug-ins and mini plug-in script

see:

// The script code, C source code compiling with GNU CC (GCC) in notepad++ (by "NppExec" plug-in) and compressing with UPX...
//
// Enable? "//" signs remove in code line. 
// Sample: C:\Program Files\CodeBlocks\MinGW\bin\gcc.exe "$(FULL_CURRENT_PATH)" -o $(NAME_PART)

YOUR_GCC\BIN\_PATH_HERE\gcc.exe "$(FULL_CURRENT_PATH)" -o $(NAME_PART)

// UPX Compress (with "--best, --ultra-brute" options)
// Enable? "//" signs remove in code line. 
// Sample: C:\WINDOWS\system32\upx.exe --best --ultra-brute $(NAME_PART).exe

YOUR_UPX_PATH_HERE\upx.exe --best --ultra-brute $(NAME_PART).exe

  • 0

I tried doing the post above to see if it worked and it seemed to compile fine, but it doesn't generate the .exe file within the folder with my sourcecode. I'm guessing the script needs some addition to copy it there.

  Punio4 said:
Problem with DevC++ is that the editor has some pretty bad highlighting and options. Notepad++ is miles ahead.

Now, I found that Notepad++ has options to run an external program, with arguments, when pressing F5, explained on the following link: http://notepad-plus.sourceforge.net/uk/run-HOWTO.php

Could anyone tell me how exactly to do that, and to which file? DevC++ is based on GCC, so it has gcc.exe in its root folder.

In lixux, the gcc syntax is, if I remember correctly:

gcc inputname.c -o outputname

Anyway, to sum it up, I would need the following: When you press F5, n++ calls GCC, and compiles and runs a new file, with its filename the same as the source code filename.

Thanx in advance :)

You can edit the highlighting of DevC++ although I do like Notepad++. You might want to give Code::Blocks a go. It's also a pretty lightweight IDE, and it has some customisation options for syntax highlighting also.

  • 0
  Dr_Asik said:
On my system, Visual Studio's cold start is about 3 seconds, while Code::Blocks takes above 5 seconds. Eclipse takes 15 :p . I wouldn't rule out VS on the sole basis that it's a large and powerful IDE. It's also very efficient.

Yeah I'll give you that, VS starts pretty quick on mine, although saying that Code::Blocks is around the same time. Feature-wise VS wins but I still like using CB / Dev C++ :p I think when I first started out and tried to do a few things in VS and it threw all this code at me before I could any of my own threw me a bit. Maybe I just tend to avoid it subconsciously now :laugh:

  • 0
  ViZioN said:
Yeah I'll give you that, VS starts pretty quick on mine, although saying that Code::Blocks is around the same time. Feature-wise VS wins but I still like using CB / Dev C++ :p I think when I first started out and tried to do a few things in VS and it threw all this code at me before I could any of my own threw me a bit. Maybe I just tend to avoid it subconsciously now :laugh:
I just redid my very informal test in which I count seconds out loud, watching the clock gadget, after lauching the program :

Visual Studio : 2.5 seconds

Code::Blocks : 3 seconds

Eclipse : 14 seconds

It's not very scientific :p but the results seem consistent. I wonder if there's an easy way to write a program that can reliably benchmark this? Anyway, my point was just to dispel the popular myth that open-source = much more efficient, because I've seen fully-fledged IDEs like DevC++ and Code::Blocks mentionned as "lightweight" alternatives, and I supposed VS was automatically cast aside based on that myth.

Of course I'm personally a big VS fan, the only reason I ever use anything else is if I'm working in Java or Python, or if I'm stuck on Linux for some homework. Oh and if you want your project to be empty : File -> New -> Project -> Visual C++ -> Empty Project. No code, not even a main.cpp. :)

  • 0
  Dr_Asik said:
On my system, Visual Studio's cold start is about 3 seconds, while Code::Blocks takes above 5 seconds. Eclipse takes 15 :p. I wouldn't rule out VS on the sole basis that it's a large and powerful IDE. It's also very efficient.

i agree. even though it's bloated, it's the best compiler out there and it's free (express edition)

  • 0
  Dr_Asik said:
Oh and if you want your project to be empty : File -> New -> Project -> Visual C++ -> Empty Project. No code, not even a main.cpp. :)

Yeah I think this was something I missed when I first started using VS :laugh: I'll give it another shot some time soon!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Elon Musk once again claims Tesla robotaxis are coming soon by David Uzondu Image via Depositphotos.com Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, has announced a tentative start date of June 22 for the company's long-awaited public robotaxi service. According to a post on his social media platform X, the initial launch will be in Austin, Texas. Musk added a significant condition, however, saying "We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift." The service is expected to begin with just 10 to 20 Model Y SUVs operating within a limited area and with remote human supervision. He also mentioned a plan starting June 28 for new Teslas to drive themselves from the factory to a customer's home. This is a moment many are probably waiting for, though it comes with a heavy dose of skepticism. Musk has made grand promises about self-driving before. This robotaxi network brings to mind the bold claims from all the way back in 2019 when the company said a similar service would launch the following year. That evidently did not happen. Federal regulators also have their doubts. Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration criticized Tesla for making its "Full Self-Driving" feature sound more capable than it actually is, demanding the company align its marketing with reality. Tesla is also driving into a field that is no longer empty. Waymo, Google's sibling company, is already a major player, offering hundreds of thousands of paid rides per week across Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and even Austin. The company is so far ahead that it has begun testing in Tokyo. But being ahead means Waymo is also the first to face certain dangers. For example, on the evening of June 8, a group of protesters in downtown Los Angeles summoned Waymo vehicles during a demonstration. When the vehicles arrived, they slashed the tires, smashed the windows, and spray-painted the cars before setting three of them on fire. Which raises a thorny question for Tesla: if you can summon a car with no one inside, can you summon it just to destroy it? It's one thing for protesters to stumble upon a robotaxi and vandalize it; it's another for someone to use the app to call a driverless car to a secluded spot for a planned attack. With public sentiment around Musk so divided, especially given his DOGE shenanigans and his recent face off with Donald Trump, that's not just a theoretical problem. We've already seen this hostility play out in attacks where people vandalize Teslas, carving swastikas into them and spray painting slogans like "Burn More Teslas" on walls.
    • This is actually quite useful. But why wouldn't they implement this in the local file system? The code is obviously all there now... maybe in 5 years.
    • The new "Story Cards" in the Software section are nice, but I wish they had the product icon included. I use this section to identify updates for software that I use regularly, and it's sometime difficult to identify the software without the product icon. Thanks for your consideration. pelaird
    • Mozilla really needed to focus on their core product for a while now. I will not mourn the death of pocket or AI garbage. One thing they don't do that I believe they should is advertise more, and not just to their core audience, especially their additional services. Let people know they actually exist.
    • Is this like tailscale?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Food-Beverages-Nutrition earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Tech Dogs earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Enthusiast
      computerdave91111 went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Week One Done
      Falisha Manpower earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      elsa777 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      199
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      196
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      138
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!