J.J. Abrams' Cloverfield Questions


Recommended Posts

I posted a collage, Rappy posted this

cloverfieldmutation.gif

Those aren't rats, those are people in biosuits.

I thought that was pretty obvious that it wasn't monsters. Especially since there's this guy sitting right outside, tending to a wounded person and not freaking out by the woman who's about to blow up.

ratatouille-foto2.jpg

+ The Ooze =

42260.jpg

I thought that was pretty obvious that it wasn't monsters. Especially since there's this guy sitting right outside, tending to a wounded person and not freaking out by the woman who's about to blow up.

ratatouille-foto2.jpg

+ The Ooze =

42260.jpg

or just throwing it out there...

splinter.jpg

I stand my ground as in saying it' giving birth to a monster and/or exploding.

Yeah I think she is exploding or giving birth to something or she is turning into one of the "off" creatures that shoots off the main creature, I had a theory its some sea creature that has obviously come from the depths so its brought stuff with it..

Yeah I think she is exploding or giving birth to something or she is turning into one of the "off" creatures that shoots off the main creature, I had a theory its some sea creature that has obviously come from the depths so its brought stuff with it..

hmmm Cellular mutation? good idea. After the victim is bitten, the virus mutates the person through the blood stream. The body doesn't recongize it untill you are bleeding from your eyes, ears and mouth (what would cause that in real life?). Then in several hours you begin to mutate.

hmmm Cellular mutation? good idea. After the victim is bitten, the virus mutates the person through the blood stream. The body doesn't recongize it untill you are bleeding from your eyes, ears and mouth (what would cause that in real life?). Then in several hours you begin to mutate.

Certain Bio Weapons can cause that effect so can haemorrhaging.

I posted a collage, Rappy posted this

cloverfieldmutation.gif

Those aren't rats, those are people in biosuits.

Some more bio suite guys

http://cloverfieldclues.blogspot.com/2007/...nal-photos.html

Um... have any of you ever seen people trying to restrain a person who is not calm? It's obvious the guys are wearing bio suits and that a woman is screaming in pain, and you can see her body expanding (and hear it too, sounds like a balloon being filled). They're not tearing her apart, they're trying to maintain control because the woman is freaking out. Why is something so simple so hard to understand...?

The Tagruato site is back and saw this

http://tagruato.jp/deepsea.php

Wake something up and it destroys NY? seeing the dot its right near NY

It's right near Japan...

However, if you click on that picture it opens an interactive world map showing all of their drilling sites, and sure enough, there's one "Opening September 2007" at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. It's not very close, but if we're talking about a huge sea-dwelling monster then it's a definite possibility for it to travel that far to New York.

It's right near Japan...

However, if you click on that picture it opens an interactive world map showing all of their drilling sites, and sure enough, there's one "Opening September 2007" at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. It's not very close, but if we're talking about a huge sea-dwelling monster then it's a definite possibility for it to travel that far to New York.

Yeah I think its something in the water.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!