Recommended Posts

Hi all,

I am trying to share some files with my sister's computer. I am using Vista whereas she is using Windows XP.

I shared her folder and then i typed this on my vista computer " \\192.168.0.102 " and then it says that it is not accessible. You might nothave permission to use this network resource. Please contact the adminsitrator.

Why is this so ?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/575002-help-with-home-network-please/
Share on other sites

did you configure file sharing on your firewalls? Are you running any firewalls other than XPs or any type of security software that might block file sharing.. virus scanners no do more than just scan files, etc.

Is she on XP home or Pro? What permissions did you setup on the share? on the file folder?

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/304040/

How to configure file sharing in Windows XP

Make sure you have File sharing enabled in Vista, I think it's not on by default...

It can be enabled through the control panel.... can't remember exactly. I once managed to get the file sharing work between XP and Vista, and the problem was just that sharing was not enabled in Vista. :)

Of course, make sure that any firewall isn't blocking connections.

Do you get a response from the other computer when pinging its IP address? (go to command prompt, and type "ping 192.168.0.102")

What kind of connection are you using? just ethernet-cable between the computers, or through a modem/router, etc?

  • 3 weeks later...

Well, I'd explain this.

Go to My Computer -> My shared folder -> Right click and then properties -> Sharing -> Tick all.

Restart.

Then let your sister go to My Network Places -> Entire Network -> 1 of these would have her PC. Make sure she does that too, try it and tell us what you get.

3) And also see KB922120 (this is probably the most important part of it though.
Most important part??? Nonsense -- having machines show up connected on the "Network Map" has absolutely NOTHING to do with accessing a file share - NOTHING!!

Thats like telling people that machines have to be in the same workgroup.. So this is going to be the new vista FUD on file sharing?

^ Sorry...:rolleyes:

But seriously, being able to see a computer helps a great deal.

Well, they have to be don't they?

NO! they freaking don't, a workgroup is nothing more than a place holder to where to put names in "browsing" Browsing has NOTHING to do with accessing a computer or its shares..

An you can see the computer JUST fine.. they just will not be connected on the total network map is all.

You will see them in the different workgroups if browsing, you can access them by name directly -- which is the fastest method

run \\computername

Seeing them with a Line drawn on your network map is nothing but eye candy - an has nothing to do with accessing shares on them.

If the user wants to see them in a pretty little map -- cause he can not figure out that his computers are all connected to his router ;) Then yes he needs to install that patch.. But it has NOTHING do with file sharing.

post-14624-1186575286_thumb.jpg

See all the machines on the network -- I can access shares just fine, I can see them just fine.. There is just not a line drawn on the map -- since they are not running the "Link-Layer Topology Discovery (LLTD) Responder" is all.

If you want, I put every single machine into a different "workgoup" and still be able to see them.. It will just take awhile for the browse list to correct it self.

Here you might learn something

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details...;displaylang=en

Computer Browsing for SOHO Networks with Microsoft Windows

Browsing has NOTHING to do with file sharing!

Here, this is what I am talking about.. As you can see now.. all the machines are in "different" workgroups. I can SEE them, I can access them!

An for grins I installed LLTD on one my xp machines.. You can see connected on the network map -- wooh hoow :rolleyes:

It can take a few minutes for the browse list to get into sync. (read the doc I linked too) the XP machines are in a xpgroup.. they will show up in a few minutes.

Even though the kids machine is not listed in the browse list yet.. Guess what I can still access it..

post-14624-1186580420.jpg

See the shared printer.

As I was saying the same workgroup has nothing to do with file sharing, nor does LLTD. So please do not spread FUD about that patch being need to share files between xp and vista.

I sometimes wonder how much use the ability to browse is?
IMHO its pretty much worthless.. Any user looking for a share, would they not know the name of the server the share is on?? ;)

It takes a lot longer to get anywhere.. it causes unnesessary chatter, etc.. etc..

If you use a share quite often, just put a shortcut to \\computername\share or map a drive letter to it, etc.

Only reason I let it even run on my network is to be able to answer questions, an post screen shots ;)

edit: I had to delete the map.. a tiny bit of personal info was on there ;) I can repost.. So we have a 50MB limit on attachments? Man, hmm maybe I should rethink how I put up screen shots if have to delete them in the future.. could make past threads a bit funny looking when found on a search.. Oh wait - no one searches here, so its all good ;)

here is the cleanedup map from the above post

post-14624-1186587788_thumb.jpg

Edited by BudMan

Just to be complete.. I told you the other machines would show up in a bit ;)

post-14624-1186591082.jpg

As you can see - all the machines are in different workgroups.. An they can be seen, an accessed ;)

Now please do not pass on any more FUD about that patch, or having to be in the same workgroup.

Vista an XP can share files just fine - there is no patches that have to be installed, nor anything special about workgroups that have to be configured, etc..

I have been trying to squash the workgroup FUD for years around here.. every time someone asks about file sharing it seems to rear its ugly head again.. We don't won't the same type of thing happening with LLTD. Thanks!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!