• 0

[C#] Need to raise event on Add() method for List<T>


Question

I have a variable declared as List<Panel> and I need to raise an event every time I add a panel to the list and I need to do this in the same class has the variable is declared (just beucase I tried to subclass Collection<T> and overriding InsertItem(), but wasn't able to access variables/methods on the same class ehere the Collection<Panel> would be declared.

Can anyone help me out? How can I raise an event on the Add() method of List<T>?

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Because you can't override the Add() method of the Generic List<T> class, trying to add events to it will be useless. What you can do, is create a class which extends the System.Collections.CollectionBase class. The CollectionBase class providers an internal collection, to which you add your own Add(), Remove(), Insert() etc. methods to create a externally-strong collection. With the code below, I am defining my custom collection, with an event which can be fired when a string is added to the collection:

public class StringCollection : CollectionBase
	{
		public delegate void StringCollectionEventHandler(object sender, StringEventArgs e);
		public event StringCollectionEventHandler StringAdded;

		public int Add(string item)
		{
			int index = this.InnerList.Add(item);
			if (StringAdded != null)
			{
				StringAdded(this, new StringEventArgs(item));
			}
			return index;
		}
	}

	public class StringEventArgs {
		private string value = string.Empty;

		internal StringEventArgs(string value)
		{
			this.value = value;
		}

		public string Value { get { return value; } }
	}

I make sure I declare both the collection, and my event arguments that I want the event to carry. What happens here is that when the user attaches an event to my collection, my collection will fire that event, passing through the item that was added:

class Program
	{
		static void Main(string[] args)
		{
			StringCollection collection = new StringCollection();
			collection.StringAdded += new StringCollection.StringCollectionEventHandler(collection_StringAdded);
			collection.Add("This		collection.Add("Is		collection.Add("A		collection.Add("Test		collection.Add("String		Console.ReadKey();
		}

		static void collection_StringAdded(object sender, StringEventArgs e)
		{
			Console.WriteLine(string.Format("'{0}' was added to the collection", e.Value));
		}
	}

  • 0

While searching on how to override the Add() method of List<T>, I found someone suggestion overriding the InsertItem() method of Collection<T>. And it works as I wanted. The only problem I was having, was with delegates and events and how would I call them from a different class. But I managed to do it...

Thanks anyway for your help Antaris! :)

  • 0

I see you've already found a solution, but had you considered using ObservableCollection<T>?

It has a built in CollectionChanged event that might be useful for you. This appears to only exist in .NET 3.0, so if you are still only using 2.0, then it really won't help you. If your use of delegates is sufficient, then ignore this, but I thought it might come in handy.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Now, kids, Dan O'Dowd is what we call a professional hater.
    • Billionaire slams 'Tesla Cultists' for praising Robotaxi, says it's 5+ years behind Waymo by David Uzondu Image via Depositphotos.com The Tesla Robotaxi program has kicked off in Austin, Texas, and reactions are pouring in from all corners of the internet. A select group of investors and influencers have been invited to try the service, which operates within a limited area of South Austin for a price of $4.20. While the vehicles are operating without anyone in the driver's seat, the program has specific rules for this pilot phase, including a human "safety monitor" who rides along in the passenger seat just in case things go sideways. Of course, the launch did not go unnoticed by Tesla's most vocal and well-funded critic, Dan O'Dowd. O'Dowd is the billionaire founder of a group called The Dawn Project, which has dedicated itself to highlighting what it calls critical safety failures in Tesla's Full Self-Driving software. He refers to himself as an expert in creating "unhackable" software for military and aerospace clients, and ran for U.S. Senate back in 2022 on a single-issue platform: to "make computers safe for humanity" by banning Tesla's FSD. In 2023, He was banned from advertising on X after He made promoted posts that show Tesla FSD among other things, failing to stop at Stop signs. Last year, his group, The Dawn Project, paid for a Super Bowl ad, where a Tesla equipped with FSD did not act on a child-sized mannequin in the road. That commercial ends with a message, urging parents to "boycott Tesla to keep your kids safe." Today, O'Dowd took to X to slam the launch of the Robotaxi service, saying the "Tesla Cultists are celebrating victory" over a system he believes is years behind the competition (especially Waymo). He pointed out that with only fourteen cars operating for half the day, the system was already making significant errors, a rate he claims is consistent with community-tracked FSD data. The videos shared by the creators (Rob Maurer and Ed Niedermeyer), O'Dowd mentioned in his post, appear questionable, depending on your perspective. In Maurer's video, a trip that was otherwise smooth had a few unnerving seconds of the vehicle slightly swerving into the wrong lane, correcting itself, swerving again, correcting itself, and then finally settling. The other video from Ed Niedermeyer shows something entirely different. Niedermeyer captured a Tesla Robotaxi approaching an "extensive crime scene" with multiple police vehicles parked on the side of the road. On his personal Bluesky account (Ed stopped posting on X late last year, in protest of Musk), He claims the Tesla braked hard twice for no clear reason. In his commentary, Niedermeyer argued the car "shouldn't react to any of these police vehicles," and that it was concerning how it reacted to some but not others, before stopping in the "middle of the road instead of defaulting to a minimal risk condition."
    • Arch is now also using Wayland as the default session for Plasma 6.4, with X11 session becoming optional (so upgrading to Plasma 6.4 on X11 Arch might need manual intervention). It's been well over a decade in making, but I guess the time for Wayland to be the default is finally upon us.
    • I don't want Facebook on my computer or phone, why would I want it on my face, looking at everything I see?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ravenmanNE earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      Brett76 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      Miguel Batista earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      moojay67 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      656
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      229
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      220
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      150
    5. 5
      Xenon
      142
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!