Windows Server Licensing in Testing Environment


Recommended Posts

The topic and description says it all. If there were a testing environment just for testing other software, and those machines were ghost imaged all the time and swapped around for different testing purposes, would Microsoft legally require there to be licenses for each of the servers? They can change machines all the time due to the ghosting going on. Also, they never go into the real world -- they would be testing for OTHER machines that WOULD be going into an actual production environment. This is not a "live" environment.

Also, if someone could provide clear documentation on this from Microsoft, that would be greatly appreciated, because I sure can't find it on their website.

I work for a Microsoft Gold Partner and we are allowed unlimited licenses (AFAIK) for Windows Server 2003 for use in a development/test environment.

If you do not currently have any kind of Volume deal etc... then I would suggest that techinally you would need a license for each copy of the software that is running at any one time. So if you were to run 6 test servers at any one time, then you would require 6 licenses.

My suggestion would be to visit the Microsoft website and download the 180 day evaluation of the Server Edition that you need to use for your testing purposes then you needn't worry about licensing.

  MagicMan said:
I work for a Microsoft Gold Partner and we are allowed unlimited licenses (AFAIK) for Windows Server 2003 for use in a development/test environment.

If you do not currently have any kind of Volume deal etc... then I would suggest that techinally you would need a license for each copy of the software that is running at any one time. So if you were to run 6 test servers at any one time, then you would require 6 licenses.

My suggestion would be to visit the Microsoft website and download the 180 day evaluation of the Server Edition that you need to use for your testing purposes then you needn't worry about licensing.

Yes, but then there's the date issue. It'd be a pain to roll it back all the time.

No agreement set up right now, but our licenses could be used for other things, rather than the test stuff. It'd sure help out.

Hey.. ;)

If you have no MSDN or Volume/EA type aggrements with MS. I would suggest you call them - tell them what your doing, an what is the best way to be legal in doing it.

We own quite a few MSDN subscriptions an a full EA, I can ask our licensing guy.. But to be honest if you do not hold some type of agreement with them. I don't think what your doing is on the full up an up.

Your best bet is to just CALL THEM.. which would be much better info that what your going to get from some strangers on the net ;)

  Catharsis said:
Anyone know of a way to call them to ask them this simple question without having to pay $99? I can't find a contact line on their site.

Where exactly were you looking??? Maybe its just me -- but hmmm, lets see now.. License related question, maybe the licensing FAQ would have something :rofl:

Why what do you know - first freaking question.. hehehehe

http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/resources/faq.mspx

Q. How can I get help with specific licensing questions?

A. Review the Licensing section for information on specific program details, licensing briefs, and other resources.

Or you can call (800) 426-9400, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M.–5:30 P.M. Pacific Time to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist. Worldwide customers can see Microsoft licensing sites worldwide to find contact information in their locations.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I've set since XP - Best performance in the Performance settings. 11 included. I enable only the show shadows after that, so I can see better fonts and mouse.. But hardly I can say I can see a difference today.
    • Yeah this kinda means nothing to me if it's going to be the same mess as HDMI 2.1 where it was difficult to know what features you were getting. It was way too confusing, designed to fool us into thinking we was getting something better with the higher number when a lot of the times we didn't get anything better because companies can add and remove features at will, which if that is the case for 2.2, then who cares lol.
    • Someone wrote a script to block 'brainrot' content online using an $8 smart plug by Usama Jawad Original image via Neil Chen Many people use smart plugs nowadays due to the various advantages they offer, including automation, integration with mobile software, increased home security, better energy efficiency, and compatibility with other smart products. However, a smart plug customer has gone a step further by enhancing their hardware in a way that it blocks them from viewing "brainrot" content online, or any website, for that matter. As seen in a popular thread over on Hacker News, a person known as "NWChen" has written a script that connects to the $8 Kasa Smart Wi-Fi Plug Mini and utilizes it to restrict access to websites of your choice. In essence, this plug then acts as a physical switch that you can toggle to visit certain websites. NWChen's main motivation behind this initiative was to avoid brainrot, with examples listed as X (formerly known as Twitter), Instagram, YouTube, and Reddit in their blog post. In terms of technical functionality, the smart plug connects to Wi-Fi (obviously) and hosts a physical switch that can be used to turn it on and off. NWChen's script connects to the smart plug via an API and then polls its state. If it's on, websites of your choice get restricted and you can't open them anymore, until you physically get up and turn off the plug, or remove the website from you blocklist. NWChen has recommended plugging in the hardware far away from you so there is sufficient resistance in turning off the plug. In the thread, many have praised this invention, believing that the nature of this mechanism provides enough hurdles where you'd rather just not visit the problematic websites anymore. However, some have noted that "those without self control cannot be trusted if they hold the switch". Some have also highlighted a problem where a user can simply stop the script's execution without much friction. Overall, it's a fairly interesting setup, even if it's fairly rudimentary in nature. Configuring this physical block with a Kasa smart plug is fairly easy. You can simply download the script from the laptop-brick GitHub project here, install it, get the IP address of your smart plug, and then use it when you're executing the script. You can modify the blocklist using a dedicated file present inside the GitHub project.
    • We'll probably mirror the EU rule, we've done that in many other areas, but if we don't, well we can add this as another reason why Brexit shouldn't have happened. Personally, if I started to get ads in WhatsApp, that would be a big incentive for me to want to switch to an alternative, and I doubt it will be difficult for me to get my contacts to change as well.
    • It reminds me of fossil fuels, as they try to push the price up and renewable energy continues to get better and cheaper, it's putting the squeeze on the fossil fuel industry. In this case, bringing jobs back to modern countries with higher wages would be a big incentive for corporations to remove humans from the workforce and replace them with AI and robotics, and the funny thing is about that, consumers will demand it because they want things cheaper not more expensive, also corporations will be forced to do it if they want to survive against others that go that route. At the end of the day, they didn't pick cheap labour because they wanted to do so, they did so because competition forced companies to do so, bringing jobs back to western countries would make these companies less competitive on the world stage, unless they use a lot more AI and robotics to remove a lot of humans from the workforce. With that said, bringing jobs back to more stable regions and using AI and robotics does have the benefit of reducing the risk of political trade wars and tariffs, but let's forget this idea of jobs coming back home to higher paying wages, that idea is dead in the water with the advancement of AI and robotics, and with humans, it would only end up making a lot more things more expensive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Miguel Batista earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Dedicated
      moojay67 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      urbanmopdubai1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Johnny Mrkvička earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      654
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      230
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      220
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      151
    5. 5
      Xenon
      145
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!