Windows Server Licensing in Testing Environment


Recommended Posts

The topic and description says it all. If there were a testing environment just for testing other software, and those machines were ghost imaged all the time and swapped around for different testing purposes, would Microsoft legally require there to be licenses for each of the servers? They can change machines all the time due to the ghosting going on. Also, they never go into the real world -- they would be testing for OTHER machines that WOULD be going into an actual production environment. This is not a "live" environment.

Also, if someone could provide clear documentation on this from Microsoft, that would be greatly appreciated, because I sure can't find it on their website.

I work for a Microsoft Gold Partner and we are allowed unlimited licenses (AFAIK) for Windows Server 2003 for use in a development/test environment.

If you do not currently have any kind of Volume deal etc... then I would suggest that techinally you would need a license for each copy of the software that is running at any one time. So if you were to run 6 test servers at any one time, then you would require 6 licenses.

My suggestion would be to visit the Microsoft website and download the 180 day evaluation of the Server Edition that you need to use for your testing purposes then you needn't worry about licensing.

  MagicMan said:
I work for a Microsoft Gold Partner and we are allowed unlimited licenses (AFAIK) for Windows Server 2003 for use in a development/test environment.

If you do not currently have any kind of Volume deal etc... then I would suggest that techinally you would need a license for each copy of the software that is running at any one time. So if you were to run 6 test servers at any one time, then you would require 6 licenses.

My suggestion would be to visit the Microsoft website and download the 180 day evaluation of the Server Edition that you need to use for your testing purposes then you needn't worry about licensing.

Yes, but then there's the date issue. It'd be a pain to roll it back all the time.

No agreement set up right now, but our licenses could be used for other things, rather than the test stuff. It'd sure help out.

Hey.. ;)

If you have no MSDN or Volume/EA type aggrements with MS. I would suggest you call them - tell them what your doing, an what is the best way to be legal in doing it.

We own quite a few MSDN subscriptions an a full EA, I can ask our licensing guy.. But to be honest if you do not hold some type of agreement with them. I don't think what your doing is on the full up an up.

Your best bet is to just CALL THEM.. which would be much better info that what your going to get from some strangers on the net ;)

  Catharsis said:
Anyone know of a way to call them to ask them this simple question without having to pay $99? I can't find a contact line on their site.

Where exactly were you looking??? Maybe its just me -- but hmmm, lets see now.. License related question, maybe the licensing FAQ would have something :rofl:

Why what do you know - first freaking question.. hehehehe

http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/resources/faq.mspx

Q. How can I get help with specific licensing questions?

A. Review the Licensing section for information on specific program details, licensing briefs, and other resources.

Or you can call (800) 426-9400, Monday through Friday, 6:00 A.M.–5:30 P.M. Pacific Time to speak directly to a Microsoft licensing specialist. Worldwide customers can see Microsoft licensing sites worldwide to find contact information in their locations.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yes, agree 100%!! It baffles me that so many people are so outspoken about hating Win11 but have taken zero steps towards trying out other operating systems. If you don't like the direction Microsoft is taking Windows, then staying on Windows 10 is only the short-term solution, clearly the long-term solution is to find an OS you prefer. Let's be honest about two things...Windows 10 was FAR from perfect, it makes many of the same offenses that 11 does, but maybe to a lesser degree. Also, if anyone is holding out hope that Windows 12 will be some kind of return to the good-old-days, they are being extremely naive. What will end up happening is they will get dragged along to W11 once W10 support fully ends (and they realize 10 IoT isn't what they thought it was), just like they got dragged from Windows 7 to 10. Then start the cycle over, they will figure out how to make W11 work the way they want it to and will start complaining about how bad W12 is.
    • only works for 1 microsoft account . im on rp channel and have 2 pcs with the same microsoft account, i pc got it the other one did not
    • Your first comment about one needing to send all their data to Microsoft's "cloud" to continue Windows 10 support was of course ridiculous but I can't disagree here. I am not sure why the OP would wait to switch to Linux if their Mom just uses a browser as she can use the same one with Linux. Why would she care what OS is running? Install /configure Linux Mint or Ubuntu LTS and almost no maintenance really.
    • Seagate Exos 20 TB BarraCuda 16 TB 7200 RPM CMR hard disk drives are limited-time deals by Sayan Sen Currently, there are some great sales on SSDs, in particular, NVMe M.2 ones, like this SK hynix P41 Platinum P41. However, if you are in the market for a hard disk drive (HDD), then Seagate has you covered. That is because two high-capacity drives, the Exos X20 20TB and the BarraCuda 16 TB are currently at great prices (purchase links down below). Since both of them are high capacity models, they are based on CMR or Conventional Magnetic Recording technology which is typically great for robust use cases like on NAS or (media) home servers and similar such scenarios. However, the Exos is enterprise-grade quality so it is definitely what you would want for 24x7 usage, but the BarraCuda can also serve pretty well but will be a better option for backup purposes. The Exos X20 promises power-on hours of 8760 per year, while the BarraCuda claims 2400. The latter comes with double the DRAM cache, though with 512 MB of it, while the former has 256 MB, but it should still be plenty. In terms of data transfer speed, Seagate promises up to 285 MB/s (272 MiB/s) from the Exos X20 and the BarraCuda is rated for up to 190 MB/s. These are the maximum sustained data transfer rates for the two drives. Since the Exos X20 is an enterprise-class product Seagate does disclose its random performance throughput, which is 168 IOPS for reads and 550 IOPS for writes, respectively. While the BarraCuda's randoms are not specified it is expected to be lower and to compensate, it packs double the DRAM cache. Get the HDDs at the links below: Seagate Exos X20 ST20000NM007D 20TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive: $379.00 + $50 off with promo code SACET2372 => $329.00 (Newegg US) Seagate BarraCuda ST16000DM001 16TB SATA 6.0Gb/s 3.5" Internal Hard Drive Drive: $194.99 (Newegg US) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the Amazon US deals page here. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why do you think the writing is on the wall? Tesla continues to have the highest selling models on the planet, and they continue to grow on that despite their junk reliability rating. I'm not going to buy one because of the continued build quality issues (and lack of Carplay), but I appreciate that they're the best player in an EV market that is massively lacking in infrastructure and affordability. Besides the EV technology needing to eventually outpace gasoline, self-driving technology is undoubtedly going to be the future. It's not going to happen tomorrow and not even in 10 years, but within our lifetimes, most cars on the road will be self-driving. That's the only way to solve the issue of a million deaths on the road. Waymo is using technology that's simply too expensive, which means it has to charge high fares. Tesla is going to blow past them with their ~$40k car and further yet when they release that weird looking 2-seater. Pretty soon Nvidia is going to be a market player, Amazon will be a player, and possibly the other 20+ startups that are working on a vehicle. I'd like to revisit this in a year and see how the market looks. I'm willing to bet there will be a huge increase of driverless cars on the road, and I doubt that Waymo is going to be the majority of them. Waymo isn't profitable for Google, so it's entirely possible the plug gets pulled as soon as several players leave them in the dust.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      DrRonSr earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Sharon dixon earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Parallax Abstraction earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      956400 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidfegan earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      616
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      229
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      167
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      161
    5. 5
      Xenon
      142
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!