• 0

Which forum is best for what I need....IPB, VB,.....


Question

I run an electric car website where I have been using SMF.

I got hacked. Now I am looking to put up smf again or move to a new forum that is more secure hopefully.

I want a good looking forum with lots of integratable features like gallery, blog, news sections, things I may want in the future basically.

I don't wanna waste money on something that I will just decide is not for me so I want something that will provide everything I could need.

I am leaning towards IPB but that may be dumb because I get the feeling that I am only doing this because it looks better to me.

I would like a forum with a very clean and elegant look kind of like apple does with its products if you know what I mean.

I have looked into IPB, VB, PHPBB, SMF, ubb threads and Vanilla.

Vanilla is actually to me the best looking but offers not near enough features and is more of a casual discussion board in my opinion.

If you would like me to delve deeper in detail of what i need so that you can help me out, I am happy to although I'm not sure whatelse there is to say.

Please tell me what the difference between IPB and VB is and please answer with information and reasons rather then just saying one is better. I cannot get a good answer.

VB seems to be the safter bet but I am just sick of the layout and look. I know its customizable but to what degree?

Please help and thankyou

I am very new to this.....

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I would recommend IP.Board (IPB) You can get addon packages which include Gallery and Blog which is something you are looking for.

IP.Board has a very use friendly interface. as for safety. There is no board where security is the best, they both equally have security flaws, however they are usually patched fairly quickly upon discovery. But IP.Board is quite safe, take this site for example. It uses IP.Board 2.3.1 :)

  • 0
I would recommend IP.Board (IPB) You can get addon packages which include Gallery and Blog which is something you are looking for. IP.Board has a very use friendly interface. as for safety. There is no board where security is the best, they both equally have security flaws, however they are usually patched fairly quickly upon discovery. But IP.Board is quite safe, take this site for example. It uses IP.Board 2.3.1 :)
thanksI am leaning towards IPB but on most boards the majority lean towards VB, is this because its has been around longer? I'm really confused. I suppose it doens't really mattter that much but I would of atleast of expected one to be better at one thing and the other at another thing.
  • 0

In the past I would have said IPB, but I have since started using other forums.

If you want a full site to go with the forum I woudl suggest Dragonfly CMS though. it comes with a version of phpBB. ad Dragonfly is programmed centered around security, and in my experience is by far the most secure CMS/BB. plugins/modules for Dragonfly also have a security rating/certification so you can make sure you only install trusted secure modules.

  • 0

I recently opened up a new site of mine to the public (spamz0rs) that is run by IPB with the gallery and blog additions. The front page news is also run by the built-in features of IPB. It is a tad costly, but sometimes it is actually worth it to fork over the cash. Although this new site of mine is just starting out and has a lot of growing to do, I have been very happy with IPB's performance so far (and I doubt I will have any major problems with it anytime soon).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 1. Define "better". 2. It's still more expensive than equivalent PCs so...
    • Major Xbox layoffs may claim South of Midnight developer Compulsion entirely by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft has been making major changes in its gaming wing Xbox for a few months now, including the appointment of a new CEO, a large number of leadership changes, and strategy shifts. However, the company is seemingly also looking at initiating a major layoffs wave at Xbox and perhaps even a studio closure. The new report lands from Kotaku, Xbox first-party developer Compulsion Games is being shuttered soon by Microsoft. For those unfamiliar with the studio, it's the team behind Contrast (2013), We Happy Few (2018), and South of Midnight (2025). Its latest game was quite well received, even winning a Peabody Award for its writing. It even received a 9/10 in Neowin's own review, highlighting its engaging storyline, gorgeous world, and curious characters. The studio joined Xbox Game Studios in 2018, just as Microsoft announced it is acquiring Playground Games, Undead Labs, and Ninja Theory. Despite recent listings for new staff roles, according to the new report, Compulsion Games is being closed entirely, with over 90 staff being let go. Kotaku also added that the studio's leadership is in negotiations with Microsoft about this decision, but no official details have been revealed yet. The report lands just as two senior managers of Xbox leave their posts at Microsoft Gaming. Head of Xbox Game Studios Craig Duncan and chief of staff Louise O'Connor originally began their journey in Rare and have been a part of Xbox for over two decades. Dunkan has been responsible for games like Kinect Sports and Sea of Thieves, while O'Connor was primarily working on Rare's Everwild project before its cancelation. If this report about the studio shutdown is accurate, this may just be the start of a major new layoffs wave at Xbox Game Studios. There are also rumors of Arkane Studios being heavily affected. As always, take all these reports with a grain of salt until something official materializes from Microsoft or the studios.
    • The flaw with this analysis is that this laptop has a cellphone CPU in it. In the Intel world, that would be an N150 and those are everywhere, even in low end laptops. You can get an N150 based NUC with 16GB RAM and 256GB-512GB SSD... NOT soldered in... for < $500 Canadian (around US$360). The problem is two fold: tech bloggers/writers on most tech site (like this one, ironically) overvalue Apple and apparently aren't in the same earnings class as most regular people. As a result, we get breathless articles about how everyone needs a folding phone when most people just cannot afford one... or really need one. And we get Apple used as the baseline metric regardless of whether that comparison makes any sense. If Dell or HP released a retail laptop with a cellphone motherboard, you'd be all over them for doing that - but Apple does it and it's genius. I see articles suggesting what Samsung - a company that basically started the foldable phone market and has built them for eight years - needs to do to compete with Apple's unreleased, unspecced and unseen folding phone. Sorry, no - if the Neo (really creative name there BTW - still, better than the Go, the other "creative" product name everyone's using) encourages PC makers to make cellphone laptops using lower end ARM processors, we all lose. It's a step backwards and a capitulation to the fact that semiconductor makers and computer OEMs (and tech bloggers) have totally lost the plot.
    • Everyone should install this extension and ignore games that use AI. https://chromewebstore.google....nnigaaeelfkeomjcngmnh?pli=1 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ai-warning-for-steam/
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!