[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

And, to the people that didn't like the episode:

I think you should have learnt by now not to expect anything groundbreaking in either the acting or the script but it does have its moments. Tonight?s episode when Davros claims his "final victory" by showing the Doctor as a coward running away daring never to look back at his children of time - this was very well written/acted and quite emotional as other have other scenes been. But ultimately Doctor Who is a prime-time cheesy action/adventure show appealing to a wide audience so what can you expect really? I think they do a fine job with it; although ? I am looking forward to see what other writers can do with the show next series.

Edited by Jedimark

Great episode, I think it rounded everything up nicely, and following the few specials next year don't try to start anything too big, it will be a nice clean slate for Moffat to start on.

Has to be Sally Sparrow!

careymulligan01afd8.jpg

If only!

Id sign that petition, lol.

I was so happy that Rose finally got the ending that she always wanted.... Even if we didn't find out exactly what the doctor wanted to say, I think we can guess ;)

"Lets go play scrabble?" :p

Well, I don't think it was the best episode of Doctor Who ever, but it was damn good. I thought Donna's arc was horribly sad, and in effect she did "die" as the Doctor had to do what he did. Rose, sorta got what she wanted, but really didn't. Martha and Jack, uh, maybe Torchwood, maybe not? Mickey, right on. Jackie goes back of course with Rose, so that's good. Woulda been nice to see Pete though. And Sarah Jane Smith, as always, you betcha.

Overall though, the point of the show, is that the Doctor can never, ever love someone the way the other Humans do. He can never get married and have kids, blah blah. So, he's a tragic hero, in the classical sense. He went from having his entire "family" in the TARDIS, and then 3 hours later or whatever he was all alone again. I thought it was brilliantly done actually. But I would have liked Donna to have remembered at least something at the end. Then again, they said Rose could never return, so we all know how that works out don't we?

And, yes. Bring on the Cybermen for the Christmas special!

Here's something interesting ... Osterhagen is an anagram of Earths Gone :o

Look's like I was right, in part, if they had used it that's what would have happened ...

YAY!!! Donna's gone :p

Only just watched it as my Sky+ went ###### up and didn't record properly :(

Well i enjoyed the finalle a lot. All the gang back together and that Tardis "party" with all of them inside almost make me cry.

I was thinking all week that we might see the Doctor's daughter in a Deus Ex Machina way and helping a lot with the storyline but nothing. Is shes going on on a spin off Doctor Who series? Well her father (Steven Moffat) will be taking the wheel next year and he has given us many great episodes (The girl in the fireplace, Blink). :rolleyes:

I have to say, I wasn't overly impressed with this episode, either. I hated how the whole plan was foiled with a simple control panel thing.

I also hated how they just piled in every single character they could for no real reason. I mean really, what did any of them do except hang around and go "oh no!". Why even bother with torchwood? And how many times did davros say something was his "final victory"?

Very disappointed. I'm pleased at the overall outcome of the story, but it was so anti-climatic.

...I was thinking all week that we might see the Doctor's daughter in a Deus Ex Machina way and helping a lot with the storyline but nothing. Is shes going on on a spin off Doctor Who series? Well her father (Steven Moffat) will be taking the wheel next year and he has given us many great episodes (The girl in the fireplace, Blink). :rolleyes:

Georgia Moffett's father is Peter Davidson - not Steven Moffat (who will take the wheel for the 2010 series)

More or less true then.

That was an amazing episode. The end was so sad :cry:

The only bit my source wasn't accurate on was that the doctor didn't travel back in time to save Donna's life and instead gave her her a mind wipe to save her.

I've some more spoilers on the Xmas epsiode and casting details on the 4 specials that I will share here next week after I've confirmed with my source that the details are definately correct.

:)

I thought it was alright, but I didn't like the way they broke down the boundries of Doctor Who (like Rose and the Clone Doctor fella getting together).

Shame Donna has gone though :p! It would have been better if they killed her off in a better way, so she at least had her memories.

I was all pumped for a GREAT episode, and it felt like a real cheap cop-out at the end.

And so much for "Now we can see how it's meant to be flown"... BS!

I detested this episode - the coming together felt like a fanboy's wet dream, except it didn't pay off. It was nowhere near as intelligent as it should hav been!

are you stupid how can donna tyravel back in time to sdave her mind wipe. cus if that happened she wouldnt have the knowledge of the time lord, therefore she couldnt reverse davros's electeric shooter thing, she couldnt disable all daklek weaponry and spin then out, i think it ll gets sorted out time wise, everuthing reverts back to hoow it was bt stuff liek the cybermen is an unknown becuaise...

doctor said that how it starts everywhever i.e. 1 person trying to better than selves and turning intio cybermen, bio mechanical organisms

Having finally watched the finale, I can't help but feel completely cheated. I loved the first half of Journey's End, but almost everything after Davros' plan coming undone didn't impress me. As some one said above, it feels like a huge cop-out.

I also liked Donna channeling the Doctor. Sad that she won't continue as a companion, she grew on me as the series went on.

The whole thing could have been so much better. Credit to Murray Gold though, the score for this episode was simply fantastic.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • I sort of agree with you on that. I had a telescope - a real hefty thing, although only around 500CHF - that got me so fascinated about the stars and planets. I would stare for hours, amazed that I could see the craters of the moon or the rings of Saturn in "realtime" (quotations because, y'know, speed of light and whatnot). A friend of mine has a telescope like the one mentioned in the review, and the pictures are amazing to look at. But there is something missing for me. I may as well just go to NASA's website and look through their gallery.
    • As opposed to catching bad press because it's the engine's fault? You didn't really think this through did you? lol
    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!