[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

How's this for a wild theory which im surprised no one else has suggested.

Is it not possible that this could be a regeneration of the 1st Doctors Granddaughter Susan Foreman? I believe she was left on earth after the Dalek Invasion. Without a Tardis to help the transition perhaps her regenerations are more difficult and varied hence the little girl body???

Granted if im right i've no idea how she would have avoided the time war and all the Time lords being killed without the aid of those pocket watches.

Longshot.

KeO7F.jpg

Wow, good job with this, it's hard to wrap your head around it when told but with this visual chart you get an idea of the mess time traveling can do. I know long distance relationships are hard but this is nuts.

A writer for The Sarah Jane Adventures has confirmed that the series will not continue without lead actress Elisabeth Sladen.

The actress passed away before filming could be completed on the show's fifth series, but recent reports suggested that scripts were being rewritten to explain her absence.

However, writing on his Twitter account, series writer Gareth Roberts denied the rumours, insisting "The story... re SJA is not true (sic)."

Roberts has worked on 15 episodes of the CBBC drama and has also written for parent series Doctor Who.

Prior to her death, Sladen filmed three two-part stories for the show's fifth run, including one serial written by Roberts. It is currently unclear when or if these episodes will air.

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/tv/s47/sarah-jane-adventures/news/a317726/sarah-jane-writer-denies-series-rumours.html

The official website has confirmed that The Sarah Jane Adventures will not continue without Elisabeth Sladen in response to some press rumours to the contrary. The 6 completed episodes of Series 5 will be shown, however, at a date still to be confirmed.

The BBC confirmed today that following the death of Elisabeth Sladen there are no plans to film further episodes of The Sarah Jane Adventures.

Elisabeth Sladen first played the role of Sarah Jane in Doctor Who in 1973 and following her return to the show in 2006, played the eponymous lead in the award-winning CBBC series, The Sarah Jane Adventures, from 2007 onwards.

The full statement regarding the future of the series is below:

?Contrary to press reports today we can confirm that no new episodes of The Sarah Jane Adventures will be filmed following the tragic death of actress Elisabeth Sladen in April, 2011. As a tribute to Elisabeth the six episodes that were recorded with her last year will be broadcast on CBBC at a date to be confirmed.?

Source: Doctor Who TV http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/sarah-jane-adventures-update-19405.htm#ixzz1LOv55DVc

To me, Curse of the Black Spot doesn't look that interesting. I'm not a great fan pirate shows anyway.

same it doesn't look great...it seems to me as filler but it a proper 1 week story episode which we will get now until mid season finale

Could the sixth series of Doctor Who be the last for Amy and Rory? The evidence is mounting?

It has been announced that Arthur Darvill has signed on to play Mephistopheles in the Shakespeare?s Globe?s production of Christopher Marlowe?s Doctor Faustus.

This production will be running from 18th June through to 2nd October 2011. Given that Doctor Who traditionally begins filming in the summer, Darvill would not have time to fit in all of Series 7?s shooting schedule.

As for Karen Gillan, she will be starring as Jean Shrimpton in BBC Four?s new drama, We?ll Take Manhattan. When chatting about the project Gillan said, ?When that script came along I was like, ?This is perfect for the first thing that I do after I finish Doctor Who.??

Source: Doctor Who TV http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/whos-leaving-who-19519.htm#ixzz1LaA8AQf3

Nooooooooooooo! Amy is awesome. I could do without Rory. Or River. But I'd like Amy to stay for a while :(

I'm right the opposite. I like Rory and River and Amy is beautiful and all but really annoying. She seems more so the longer she is in the series.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!