[Official] Doctor Who Thread


Recommended Posts

Here's a thing:

So the doctor

(s) swapped places at some point

. And Amy

started talking about his death to .... which one?

.

She told the

real one

, he mentions it at the end that they aren't invited to

this death

(or something alone these lines), so now he knows, lol.

Here's a thing:

So the doctor

(s) swapped places at some point

. And Amy

started talking about his death to .... which one?

.

The real one, but she didn't know. Don't let the shoes fool you, that was a misdirect.

Sunday Times posted a preview in their paper:

Amy now has a baby, but she and Melody are held captive in the season finale by panto-style villainess Madame Kovarian (Frances Barber). So the Doctor recruits a posse for a battle River Song calls his ?darkest hour?. There are bewildering moments, but plenty of fun, too and an arresting denouement.

very interesting

melody pond - river song?

Sunday Times posted a preview in their paper:

Amy now has a baby, but she and Melody are held captive in the season finale by panto-style villainess Madame Kovarian (Frances Barber). So the Doctor recruits a posse for a battle River Song calls his ?darkest hour?. There are bewildering moments, but plenty of fun, too and an arresting denouement.

very interesting

melody pond - river song?

Looks like it, I've said from the begging that it was going to turn out in a somewhat similar fashion. :p

Now I am just wondering if The Doctor is going to realise it himself when he puts it together or if he is strictly told by her.

She told the

real one

, he mentions it at the end that they aren't invited to

this death

(or something alone these lines), so now he knows, lol.

Of course he knows, if he invites them all to his death in the future that means he must have found out about his upcoming death in the past

Of course he knows, if he invites them all to his death in the future that means he must have found out about his upcoming death in the past

Umm, ok,

but the point was that they didn't tell him what they were keeping a secret all this time.

Of course the future Doctor knew, he invited him in the first place, the point was that the present Doctor didn't know what they were keeping from him which was the whole point behind it, now he does know that at some point he invites them to his future death which they have already seen.

So I don't know why you are quoting me, I was answering someone else's question about whether it was the Flesh or the Doctor that she told she had seen die.

I've hearing about

Jenny

returning as a different actress... Is that planned for this episode?

There is a character by that name in the episode, but no one knows if she's the same. Could be another character who just shares the name.

There is a character by that name in the episode, but no one knows if she's the same. Could be another character who just shares the name.

its a good chance it is....advance reviews come out tomorrow so there will be the hints released so that could be hinted at

I've sorta thought the same thing since she first appeared. She kind of DOES look like an older River.

Though back in Forest of the Dead, River was 'saved'. Maybe she somehow gets restored at some point in the timeline? Not saying that Madame is River, but it's possible that River didn't actually die at that point. Maybe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!