Recommended Posts

Hi,

Numerical order might work for most hotfixes however remember that some updates would need to be installed before others can install correctly.

You should check the dependancies of hofixes and patches to ensure that important updates are not installed out of sequence.

For example the Windows Installer 3.1 update needs to be installed before most other hotfixes, WGA needs to be installed before IE7 and WMP11 ect.

Frankly if you wanted to sort all of the WMP10 and IE hotfixes into their own sections that would be far more useful! :)

Kind Regards

Simon

what exactly does this do? does it simply modify the apm files, is it a hacked copy of autopatcher.exe, or is it your own app?

if it's either of the last two, our project manager won't be happy!

if it's the first, what exactly does it change? if it simply modifies the title fields, okay, perhaps we could do this in the main releases and have the official autopatcher.exe order everything alphabetically; if it changes the release date property, then thats not okay, the release date property determines the order of installation, which is important to preserve.

either way, i'm going to have to request that in the interest of our users, that the OP does NOT post their program. just as you shouldn't open an unknown email attachment, you shouldn't run an unknown program - i'm sure the OP has only good intentions, but you can never know!

Kimsland and theblazingangel,

The utility is standalone, i.e., independent of the Autopatcher program. What it does is change the APM files for each of the patches.

It modifies the Title so that the KB number comes first (see jpg).

It modifies the ReleaseDate so that the list is sorted by the KB Number.

You run it once on a directory of APM files.

PsiMoon314,

Good point - I was assuming that the patches themselves check for dependencies. Honestly I'm not sure how Autopatcher determines the order to install the various patches.

I did this because I recently patched a couple of computers (I run Autopatcher repeatedly until no more patches are selected) and then double checked with Windows Update which listed a number of missing patches. They were all included with Autopatcher but I had to manually select them (by KB number). I found it took too long to find the patches witth the way they were displayed.

Any way I'd love to know if doing this adversely affects how Autopatcher works!

theBlazingAngel,

Thank you for the clarification about the ReleaseDate. (Since my utility preserved the original release date I can put that back to what it was). If AP was changed so that it orders everything alphabetically that would be great!.

If given permission, I would post the source code - as it is written in Autoit3.

I was only trying to help - not cause problems - I do respect and appreciate what you and the developers of autopacher.exe have done.

-John

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!