Recommended Posts

I've been trying most of the afternoon to learn and experiment with the new slipstream commandline argument. I've not found much for documentation on how it works. I've tried it on various combinations of XP, XP 64-bit, Vista, and 2003 Server (host OS and media to be updated) with no success yet. To simplify things, I'm running AutoPatcher from C:\AutoPatcher (just to be sure network drives and pushd weren't an issue) from a slipstream.bat file that says "autopatcher.exe /nolicense /slipstream:C:\Temp\WinCD", where I've copied a CD to. The size and number of files in that folder does not increase after running AutoPatcher with /slipstream so I have no idea what it's actually doing. It is doing something different with that commandline though as it's not updating my local system either. Any tips or advice? :-P

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/583023-how-to-use-slipstream-argument/
Share on other sites

i personally have no experience slipstreaming patches. all i did with the slipstream instructions for the patches was use the /integrate switch, and point it to 'share:' which is the path the user defined on the command line, like so: "Module:\patch.exe" /quiet /norestart /overwriteoem /integrate:"share:"

if it's me thats messed up the instructions, and i actually have to point them to something within the share, i'll fix it if someone can tell me how.

also, as i said in the blog post / neowin news item, only general patches have had the slipstream instructions added. if anyone knows what the instrucitons need to be for any other module in our releases, just let me know and i'll add them!

edit: perhaps it's the quotes in the instruction? anyone want to modify an apm file and test?

i personally have no experience slipstreaming patches. all i did with the slipstream instructions for the patches was use the /integrate switch, and point it to 'share:' which is the path the user defined on the command line, like so: "Module:\patch.exe" /quiet /norestart /overwriteoem /integrate:"share:"

if it's me thats messed up the instructions, and i actually have to point them to something within the share, i'll fix it if someone can tell me how.

also, as i said in the blog post / neowin news item, only general patches have had the slipstream instructions added. if anyone knows what the instrucitons need to be for any other module in our releases, just let me know and i'll add them!

edit: perhaps it's the quotes in the instruction? anyone want to modify an apm file and test?

This works:

C:\Program Files\AutoPatcher\modules\Critical\KB936021_xp_x86_enu.apm_files>WindowsXP-KB936021-x86-ENU.exe" /quiet /norestart /overwriteoem /integrate:"C:\CDImages\XPCD"

This does not:

AUTOPATCHER.EXE /SLIPSTREAM:C:\CDImages\XPCD

I added /log:C:\ to the [slipstream] section of B936021_xp_x86_enu.apm and no log file was created. When I added log:C:\ to the [installation] section of B936021_xp_x86_enu.apm, a log file was created.

Conclusion:

The /SLIPSTREAM command line switch is not recognized.

AutoPatcher 5.6.81

I noticed that autopatcher /? was not displaying the command line help screen. After uninstalling AutoPatcher, rebooting, and installing AutoPatcher, /slipstream is working.

Hmmm... I usually just install AutoPatcher to a network share or my portable drive, not %ProgramFiles%. I wasn't aware it made any registry changes or anything that would require a reboot or a reinstall for a switch to work... ?

Hmmm... I usually just install AutoPatcher to a network share or my portable drive, not %ProgramFiles%. I wasn't aware it made any registry changes or anything that would require a reboot or a reinstall for a switch to work... ?

Well, I verified that autopatcher.exe /? does indeed display a list of options from my portable drive, but just for kicks I reinstalled AutoPatcher to the default C:/Program Files/AutoPatcher directory, rebooted, verified that /? worked, and then attempted the slipstream option again. Still no difference. I can see the checkbox list comes up differently, so I can confirm the /slipstream option is doing something, but it just does not seem to be updating any files or directories ANYWHERE on my hard drive, and definitely not the path I'm pointing it to. I've tried C:\Temp\Win2K3 (the root of the CD image) and C:\Temp\Win2K3\i386, but neither folder gets any files updated. I wish it would generate an error or a detailed log or something to study, just to see what it thought it was doing...

I've done a number of installs of autopatcher after uninstall of older core version. My XP boot partition is D:\.

I have copied the autopatcher directory to the root of my G:\ drive with a separate directory for my XP CD: G:\XPCD Using the cmd G:\autopatcher\autopatcher.exe /slipstream:g:\XPCD\I386 ; once it did nothing even though went threw integration steps, and three times updated my boot partition (Thankfully I have a ghost image, and have made a restore point before each attempt)!

Something is definitely amiss with the slipstream argument.

Sure would have been nice if all of us users out here in fantasyland had been informed about the /slipstream function/possibility.

Anyway, I've been in the habit of installing AutoPatcher in G:\AutoPatcher and, after reading the comments above, I opened a DOS box and navigated to G:\Autopatcher and tried autopatcher /? and a list of switch options did pop up so I will confirm that it does not have to be installed in \Program Files to at least respond.

No, I have not tried to slipstream anything because there is no readily apparent way to know which items it will work on. Some kind of legend should be developed so as to indicate which updates can be /integrated or /slipstreamed.

I have been known to use the RyanVM integrator to perform this function and have noticed and commented on the fact that AutoPatcher has been known to not recognize updates integrated using RyanVM.

TheBlazingAngel,

Which of the following module catagories should be able to be slipstreamed by 5.6

Critical - Assume Yes

Non-Critical - Assume Yes

Components - ?

Add-Ons - ?

Tweaks - ?

Thank you.

PS: FYI, since I expect the "tweaks" are not slipstream-able, I started with an out-of-the-box XP-SP2 disk and then used nLite to get rid of a 100 meg of keyboard and extra languages (except english (1033) in my case) files and do some of their included tweaks, and prepare an Unattended answer file, as my new pre-slipstream "starter" XP-SP2 disk.

But Note: Up until Sept / Oct 2006, all AP Criticals & Non-Critical integrated beautifully using nLite; after that it didn't integrate all. While it always only integrated "exe" not "msi" or "components", nLite was of limited value after last September. What October 2006 patch fubared the slipstream process I could not figure out.

currently most critical, most recommended, and a few component updates have slipstream setup instructions. others will have them added if someone can tell me what the instructions should be.

the warning bar is there for everyone, you haven't done anything wrong. you can only see your own, that is unless your a staff member or have special privileges (like me in the autopatcher section) in which case you can see everyones and assign warnings and stuff to people ;)

currently most critical, most recommended, and a few component updates have slipstream setup instructions. others will have them added if someone can tell me what the instructions should be.

the warning bar is there for everyone, you haven't done anything wrong. you can only see your own, that is unless your a staff member or have special privileges (like me in the autopatcher section) in which case you can see everyones and assign warnings and stuff to people ;)

Thanks, I'll be looking for slipstream info as it develops here.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Forgive my ignorance, but the only difference I see here is that a USB-A is now a USB-C, so there are two of them. For the modern age (and I'd argue since 2020), most products would now come with USB-C as an option, if not the default. Display, charging, devices, etc on TWO connectors, sometimes all combined! So having 2 of those powerful ports is great for something this size! Meanwhile my Surface Pro (5) has a single USB-A port which I cannot even get display out to, instead relying on some Surface Connect dock which I don't have. That is a poor experience, not to mention expensive and not compatible with other devices. Thank God USB-C is mainstream!
    • wow. that color finally comes to Surface Pro. was always a little jelly when a friend had the sandstone Surface Laptop. I wonder how different this dune is from the sandstone. I'll be getting the dune version. always thought black and platinum were a little boring. I'll still have access to my blue Surface Pro 11 as it'll be a hand-me-down.
    • Looks a very subjective aren't they!? I like its simple design. I love the way Apple designs their products with function over form, minimalization, and simplicity over cluttered complex designs. Many, not all, of their products follow this trend, and the device becomes a tool rather than dominating the space. I do not however like their OS. I have never bought a Apple product, and while I'd consider the Neo for my wife, I am hoping there are better alternatives out there when her failing MacBook Pro 2017 finally stops. Fischer-Price is famously plastic, garish, and poorly made. Basically you're describing the Window Laptops the Neo competes against! This is how product design should be, and what Apple have often followed in recent years: https://tenprinciples.design/
    • Isn't that true for every codec? I remember having to buy a PCI MPEG-2 decoder card just so I could play DVDs on my computer back in the late 90s. AV1 support is still fairly new.
    • I'm no Apple fan, and have never bought an Apple product for myself. But I'd argue that where you think Apple is behind regarding an OLED display, that the vast majority of people out there wouldn't even know or care for an OLED. Apple have struck the balance well to create a price point that works, and I hope that PC manufactures, and Microsoft take notice. I'd argue that Asus will struggle to compete with the Neo BECAUSE they put in a more expensive OLED that many people won't actually notice with its deeper blacks. Most people wouldn't care either that their screen is stuck at 60Hz! When I bought a 4k monitor (future proof and for the space), my laptop could only push that out at 30Hz, and it worked fine for my needs for 1.5 years! Heck, the average human eye can't see more than 90Hz in many situations!! So while they are trying to differentiate themselves, and it may well gain them a few customers, for the most part, I think they're missing the point of what the Neo is for.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!