Recommended Posts

if my or any Games/Apps had 100% compatibility with Linux, I wouldn't hesitate and would switch completely in a heartbeat. :p

But there you have that magic word if.

Take my word:

Microsoft won't make great OS unless it's forced to do so and I don't see that happening anytime soon.

for me vista vista runs good and my system is just a over a year old,mind you 2GB is the sweet spot for vista.

Xtreme2damax:sounds like you do have some problems with vista,if xp worked for you then stick to what works,if vista has what you want then try it but if anything comes up that needs fixing you need to try to fix it or better yet test it,i'm still testing vista and it's getting better,if you go in without testing you will get burned.

Xtreme2damax, so you wanna explain to me why my system still runs fast and load everything fast EVEN when my settings are in power saver WHICH UNDER CLOCKS my CPU to 800MHz. My spec are as follows:

Laptop

C2D T7300 2GHz

2GB RAM

Intel X3100 graphics card (3.5 WEI)

200GB HDD

OR Anyone wanna explain WHY MY SYSTEM LOADS APPS FAST and browsing the internet with NO LAG before you guys talk more **** about vista.

Give me your system and i will show you how slow is....

Browsing Internet? I can browse Internet with no lags on Pentium III 1Ghz

i really have no idea what this test is supposed to prove. the whole point of Superfetch is to quietly pre-load applications/files that you most frequently use. that you're 'testing' it by loading 40+ programs right after you boot will obviously overload Superfetch, and goes beyond what any normal user will even attempt. you're gaming it to be a drain, and succeeding at it quite nicely.

in any normal setting Superfetch is a net positive for Vista.

Core 2 duo, 2 gig ddr2 with no games installed on XP or Vista.

Xp boots into desktop and then some slight hd activity for a sec or two.

Vista Ultimate boots into desktop in about the same time as XP yet after a few secs there is heavy hd activity for around 40 secs with Superfetch loading.

Some apps that I try to load within this heavy hd activity are sluggish compared to after.

XP is far snappier than Vista in all aspects here and they are installed on their own identical drives which are plugged/unplugged as needed.

Does it bother me - no, not really as I like both XP and Vista.

superfetch uses low priority I/O queuing that is a new feature in windows vista. it will use idle hdd bandwidth to load things into ram

superfetch does not try to immediately load two gigs of apps into ram all at the same time, it's low priority cpu usage, and low priority i/o.

and yes superfetch keeps separate profiles for the different users

my personal experience has been that any app i commonly use loads nearly instantaneous, similar to if it was just minimized.

it is not aggressive, i have no idea where people got this idea from,

here's an article about it straight from m$

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/technetma...el/default.aspx

Whenever memory becomes free-for example, when an application exits or releases memory-SuperFetch asks the Memory Manager to fetch data and code that was recently evicted. This is done at a rate of a few pages per second with Very Low priority I/Os so that the preloading does not impact the user or other active applications.

okay so this means, if YOU are using your computers resources for ANYTHING at all, superfetch takes a back seat using no HDD bandwidth at all

edit #2 in response to an earlier post: In fact, vista will load a game into ram if you play it enough, it doesn't care what is being cached, it will do everything. (yes even oblivion) this is most likely to increase your boot times of the game, the loading times will see a lesser performance boost, as superfetch does not cache stuff into your vram yet!!!!!!! BUT vista is working on it :D

Edited by shaddix
okay so this means, if YOU are using your computers resources for ANYTHING at all, superfetch takes a back seat using no HDD bandwidth at all

This is my experience as well. Although my harddrive may work a bit after startup, I seem to be able to carry on working without any noticeable performance hit. This often makes me wonder if people who complain about Vista disk thrashing are just sitting back and waiting because they see the harddrive light on their PC flashing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!