Can someone tell the time, It's just a Wall Clock!


Recommended Posts

Isn't the answer 10. I would think the answer was 10 just by judging by the position on the face of the clock. 9 + 9/9 = 9+1=10 :woot:

He's talking about the 2 oclock one that is (9+9)/9

how it can be possible ............ it is very weired answer

It's possible because of math and order of operations?

The ! is the symbol for factorial, which means to multiply a number by each of the numbers that precede it. So 3! is 3 * 2 * 1.

aa right, interesting. Thanks

Isn't the answer 10. I would think the answer was 10 just by judging by the position on the face of the clock. 9 + 9/9 = 9+1=10 :woot:
how it can be possible ............ it is very weired answer

9+9/9, So it's 9+9 = 18, then 18/9 = 2

OMFG, My brain is hurting... How anybody could actually use this clock is just insane!

Not directed at you specifically, but overall people saying this clock is very hard to read either:

A. Never took Algebra II in high school

B. Are stupid

Because that clock is not in the least bit hard to read. All the equations are simple and taught in a regular-level Algebra II class in any high school. Furthermore you don't have to read the numbers on a clock, you already know which pointers mean which time. Like someone pointed out, a lot of analog wristwatches don't have numbers - then what?

I can't remember how he told me to read it.. but my friend has a watch, where instead of the hands and numbers there is a circuit board and six (maybe eight) red lights. And in the position of the lights it somehow tells time. I thought it was pretty neat.

You mean a binary watch?

It isn't hard to tell the time on that watch. It's simple algebra. Though, the use of only one number (9) to get numbers 1 through 12 is cool. :geek:

/geek

wow i'm officially amazed at how some people DON'T understand this :|

this is sooo easy :) stuff you learn in middle school in Brazil :| :p

7th-8th grade level knowledge in Riverside, California, USA too... at least during 1981-1983.
its not science but math.

for example: 9+9/9 = 2

Actually, mathematical operators and the rules of precedence state that 9+9/9=10.

Multiplication and division are done before addition and subtraction so the equation simplifies to 9 + (9 / 9) = 9 + 1 = 10

If you want to override precedence rules, you have to enclose things within parentheses.

So, in order to get your result of 9+9/9=2, you'd have to state the equation as (9+9)/9=2,

That reduces to 18 / 9 = 2.

cheers.

Actually, mathematical operators and the rules of precedence state that 9+9/9=10.

Multiplication and division are done before addition and subtraction so the equation simplifies to 9 + (9 / 9) = 9 + 1 = 10

If you want to override precedence rules, you have to enclose things within parentheses.

So, in order to get your result of 9+9/9=2, you'd have to state the equation as (9+9)/9=2,

That reduces to 18 / 9 = 2.

cheers.

I imagine he's referring to the way it was written on the clock, which is

9 + 9

9

which is like saying 9/9 + 9/9, which is 2.

-Spenser

I imagine he's referring to the way it was written on the clock, which is

9 + 9

9

which is like saying 9/9 + 9/9, which is 2.

-Spenser

Well that changes everything. :D Well, everything except for that whole "say what you mean" thing.

I stand corrected.

Mathmatics 101.

they are mathmatical equations that equate to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9. 10, 11, and i can't do the math on the last one :) maybe it's 12

The square root 9 is 3.

9/3 = 3.

9 + 3 = 12 :p

(unless you were kidding and I didn't get it... :()

I can't remember how he told me to read it.. but my friend has a watch, where instead of the hands and numbers there is a circuit board and six (maybe eight) red lights. And in the position of the lights it somehow tells time. I thought it was pretty neat.

That's just binary.

OK, OK, someone pointed me to this discussion and I'd better come clean.

The clock was designed for the Triple Nine Society, which is why the numbers all have exactly three nines. The "one" digit is (9/9)^9; it doesn't show well with the glare in the picture. There isn't anything really special about nine mathematically; with a little work you can do this kind of thing with just about any number. It's just because of the name of the group.

Yes, I'm the one who made it. Yes, it could have been geekier with higher math, or whatever, but I was after three nines per number, and that's what I got.

I am not going to discuss the existence or purpose of high-IQ societies.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Researchers claim Microsoft's quantum breakthrough is flawed by basic Python errors by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft's aggressive roadmap to deliver a commercial quantum supercomputer by 2029 has now hit a bit of a snag, and it's not because of a complex sub-zero dilution refrigerator, but rather because of a few lines of basic Python code. A new critique published in the scientific journal Nature argues that simple software errors effectively manufactured the breakthrough that Microsoft's foundational research claimed back in 2025 into Majorana-based topological qubits. Topological quantum computing, the path that Microsoft chose for its research, relies on creating and controlling "Majorana zero modes." These are exotic quasiparticles that theoretically offer vastly superior error resistance compared to the highly sensitive superconducting qubits currently being championed by rivals like Google and IBM. However, physically proving you have created these particles requires sifting through massive amounts of complex electrical conductance data to isolate a specific "topological gap." Because of the sheer volume of data, physicists rely heavily on custom software pipelines to process the results. This is where the Python scripts come in. Now, according to the critique, Microsoft’s data processing software contained fundamental programming errors that ultimately skewed the published results. By mishandling data arrays or deploying incorrect logic within the Python script, the software supposedly discarded "noisy" or contradictory data. Which is why it only highlighted the specific electrical measurements that supported the topological-gap claim. The researchers behind the critique argued that this makes the findings invalid, suggesting the heralded "quantum leap" was actually a false positive generated by bad code and not a product of groundbreaking physics. However, Microsoft is pushing back hard against these allegations. The Redmond giant has formally rejected the criticism, saying that it's just a minor anomaly rather than a fatal flaw. According to the company, while there may have been a minor oversight in the data parsing scripts, it does not alter the fundamental reality of their physical experiment. Just weeks ago, Microsoft unveiled the Majorana 2 quantum processor, a milestone so significant that the company boldly accelerated its timeline for a commercial quantum supercomputer from 2035 down to 2029. But the new software allegations reopen an old wound. Microsoft's quantum division faced a remarkably similar crisis when a landmark 2018 paper on Majorana particles was famously retracted in 2021 after independent physicists discovered the data had been inappropriately cropped. That historical baggage makes the current Python-related allegations particularly sensitive. If the foundational math and data processing for the 2025 breakthrough are genuinely flawed, the highly anticipated 2029 commercial timeline could easily be delayed or, worse, cancelled.
    • Because of what they have done to VMware I will never buy anything Broadcom again.
    • AMD releases hotfix for driver install issues on Windows 10 PCs by Taras Buria Earlier this week, AMD released an important graphics driver update. Version 26.6.2 brought AMD FSR 4.1 support to the previous-gen Radeon lineup, the RX 7000 series, giving users better upscaling tech that was previously locked to the newest GPUs. However, the driver turned out to be a little buggy, with users reporting installation issues on systems still running Windows 10. AMD quickly acknowledged the bug and today released a hotfix to resolve the problem. The AMD 26.6.3 Hotfix update is now available for download from the official website. Given that it is a hotfix release, it has only one change in its release notes: AMD announced the update on its official X account and added that a WHQL driver update with the necessary fixes would be released next week. Meanwhile, users can apply the hotfix or roll back to the previous driver using the official AMD Cleanup Utility. You can download AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 26.6.3 Hotfix Preview Driver from the official website here. It is compatible with all currently supported graphics cards and 64-bit Windows 10 and 11. Full release notes are available on the same page.
    • With Microsoft now listening to its core audience and acting upon received feedback, fans can finally expect a much better version of Windows 11 than what was available five years ago. Here is to five more years, Windows 11! I guess we all need a good laugh now and again...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      466
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      123
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!