Improving the speed and responsiveness of Ubuntu/GNOME.


Recommended Posts

I'm not satisfied with my Ubuntu performance, even with a tweaked system and using a light Desktop Environment like Xubuntu I notice little to no improvement in responsiveness of the interface and the general speed of the system.

My system specs are the following:

Pentium 4 1.6Ghz

Generic 768MB of DDR RAM PC2100

Western Digital 250GB Hard Drive

ATI 9700 Pro 128MB

I'm using a new up to date install of Ubuntu 7.04, I have installed the ATI restricted fglrx driver. My 3D performance works nearly the same as on Windows, Quake3 engine based games run at over 100FPS with everything on except AA and VSync. I have no issues as far as 3D.

My boot speed is also very fast and nearly identical to my Windows XP partition, around 30 seconds.

Currently I have a vanilla setup of Ubuntu/GNOME with NO compiz/beryl or any other special effects. I have the same problems under XFCE & KDE

My problems:

  • Slow rendering of windows and slight artifacts left after minimizing for approximately 0.5 seconds, for example favicon in Firefox.
  • Resizing, minimizing is a few seconds slower compared to my Windows setup.
  • Having multiple windows open overlaying each other greatly decreases the overall responsiveness of resizing, moving and minimizing windows.
  • Sluggish Firefox performance compared to Windows XP, especially in regards to scrolling.
  • Slight delay and drawing of menu and desktop icons, approximately half a second of delay.
  • High CPU usage when scrolling, minimizing, resizing and moving windows. Approximately 50-70% CPU usage.

My RAM usage on Ubuntu is very low compared to Windows XP, Ubuntu uses about 140-160MB of RAM while Windows XP uses around 170-200MB.

I tried downgrading libxll to 6_1.0.3 and forcing version, as suggested here. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x...bug/88815"" target="_blank">Sluggish rendering since xorg 7.2 update

I didn't notice any real improvement.

I have tried most of the links crimesaucer has provided me in my other threads (Thanks BTW), but I only noticed slight application startup increases and not general rendering issues that I have.

I used a lot of tips from this sidux list I found. I checked most of the tips out on Google and they seemed to be used in many different guides for speeding up your system: http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

I only used the tips that I felt comfortable with on my laptop.

However, I didn't agree with all of the Firefox about:config tips, I prefer to follow this guide: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=53650

....using the 2.0.0.5 settings from this page: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Tweaking_preferences

and also these pages:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Preferences

http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=...+at+punctuation

http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries

I found this off of digg.com: http://tvease.net/wiki/index.php?title=Twe...buntu_for_speed

and: http://www.santa-li.com/linuxonbb.html

...they basically say the same things.

This also helped a little: http://www.opendns.com/start/unix.php

and Swiftweasel: http://swiftweasel.sourceforge.net/

....also, for both of my posts, they have a setting for "vm.swappiness=0" which I didn't do because I only have 512MB ram and I figured I wouldn't mess with my swap file, because sometimes I need it.

That was a very good link, the problem is, that a few (almost half) of those are very old (for Dapper)...but there is a lot of real good info in most of those links, just make sure it's current.

What's good about a lot of those links, plus the links that I posted, is that they have the same tweaks for basically all of the settings like Broadband Internet, Swapping, and Concurrent Booting, so at least you know the info is correct, and you have more then one source of info to feel safe about these system tweaks.

Since I originally used this guide a while back (as well as a couple others that were on your page because all of them had the same info): http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

And then added these ones from your page today: http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/loc...aster-browsing/

another about Local DNS: http://www.debianadmin.com/local-dns-cache...ntu-system.html

...and this one for noatime,data=writeback and: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Improve-Per...dgy-47261.shtml

...and I finally tried prelinking, and I can say that my computer feels even faster now...and it was already fast.

I also tried various kernels and even built my own with no changes in speed what so ever. IceWeasle, Firefox and SwiftFox all work at the same speed.

==========================

HAS ANYONE ELSE EXPERIENCED SUCH PROBLEMS and IF SO, CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME!!! Sorry about the CAPS I'm just really frustrated with my poor Ubuntu performance.

The default "ATI" video driver gives me the same performance on Ubuntu except I also have poor 3D performance.

What else can I try, I think what's happening is that my video card is not rendering my desktop but my CPU is and therefore I get slowdowns and spikes. Thanks.

Hi. I have similar experience when I was using GNOME in the past. I have an old desktop PC (Pentium 2.4GHz, 512 MB RAM, 40GB HDD, ATI Radeon VE w/ X.Org built-in driver, 2 CD-RW drive).

The response of Firefox (Icewesel) was a bit slow when I was using GNOME (and KDE, as far as I can remember). Later I changed to Xfce (I install Debian base system and then Xfce), everything become very smooth.

Try to install the ATI driver for Linux from AMD (I never tried it before), I don't know if it helps, but just a chance to improve the 3D performance.

Here are 2 videos comparing the speed of my Windows XP tweaked setup and Ubuntu 7.04 which is also very tweaked. The software used to record both uses quite a bit of CPU so this is not a 100% accurate representation of speed and responsiveness. However it's a decent idea or maybe even benchmark/indication of the problem. Also keep in mind Ubuntu doesn't have the resizing artifacts you see this is due to gtk-recordMyDesktop not recording it correctly. Both desktops are about 20-30% faster with out the recording software, but still Ubuntu is significantly slower then Windows XP!!!

Ubuntu 7.04 (Slow, sluggish and not very responsive) - http://www.mediafire.com/?agyc15ebtug (Download 7MB)

VS

Windows XP Pro (Very responsive and fast) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPhbHp7WhGg

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz). As Linux development continued over the years, it seemed that KDE was getting a bit slower. I switched to fluxbox as a window manager, and have extended the life of my computer - in terms of what I consider acceptable run speeds. I seriously doubt that I could put Vista on here and have decent performance. Remeber, Linux of today has had features added over all the years since XP, so it is going to be tough to declare what versions are 'equivalent' of each other.

I use Linux with fluxbox, because it is current (I get all the latest updates) and it runs quickly (due to using flux as a WM over KDE/Gnome/XFCE).

The distro isn't going to make the biggest difference. In fact, I believe Fedora defaults to running sendmail as a background service (which I have always despised as a default install option - stupid idea, IMO).

ATI doesn't exactly earn an A+ for Linux compatibility. Maybe it's the case that the drivers work on Linux, but aren't optimized at all. That being said, yeah, Ubuntu and such variants aren't so nice on system resources. All I can suggest is trying out different distributions to see which ones work best.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).

Another tip, which will probably give you a slight performance increase (though probably not nearly as much as doubling your ram or switching to a lightweight wm) would be to use a more slimmed down and optimized distro. My favourite distribution, Arch, comes to mind, but Gentoo and Slackware are suitable alternatives. If you'd like something more on the easy-to-use side: Vector is based on Slackware and so has all the speed and advantages but rolled into an easy to use package.

Good luck :)

I am running Linux on my main box now

Intel C2D E6300 @ 1.8ghz

1 GB Ram

Nvidia 7300GS @ 128mb

Linux flies on my system and is so damn! fast. I am running Gnome with beryl and its quite lag free. When I was running Vista, my system was really slow.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

It's definitely video driver issue. I've installed Kubuntu on my 1.6ghz laptop with s3 graphics card (the biggest sh*t of all VGA cards) and I've stunned with the speed (I've had Xfce before, and it worked less responsive)

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz)........................................

Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).
I wouldn't be so sure. I went from 1 to 2gigs and noticed barely any difference and I'm using Fluxbox too!
Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

So it is! It was auto-set by my BIOS that way. I set it to 133/33 which set the CPU to 1600MHz, and the darn thing won't boot. The display is corrupted and it can't properly POST and boot. This CPU had an issue early in life where the fan (a stupid 2-wire fan with no RPM feedback signal) stopped and the CPU shut down due to overheating. It could be that something is damaged/marginal now.

Back to 1200MHz with FSB at 100 for me, I guess. But thanks for pointing that out. And I was looking forward to 33% greater processing power... :(

Get a better CPU. Not one that old. I'm using Ubuntu with a P4 3.4 GHz CPU, 1 gig of DDR2 PC3200 RAM, and an ATI Sapphire x1650 Pro 256Meg AGP vid card (1280X1024) and it runs quite well. These parts aren't as expensive as they were. Better than Vista and I had a good score under it as well.

If you want to play games just dual boot XP for them. I now use a nLited copy of XP just for games and use Ubuntu as my primary OS. This XP just has enough left in it to play games and access the net for online games. I had at first used Transgaming under Ubuntu to play games and they plaed more than fast enough, but I got tired of configuring them for it and not all of my games worked yet under it.

BTW, what version of Wine are you using. 0.44 has some big improvements with regard to DirectX and the like.

Just to verify. You are using the accelerated video driver from the Restricted Drivers Manager in the Administrator menu?

Edited by Foub
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!