Improving the speed and responsiveness of Ubuntu/GNOME.


Recommended Posts

I'm not satisfied with my Ubuntu performance, even with a tweaked system and using a light Desktop Environment like Xubuntu I notice little to no improvement in responsiveness of the interface and the general speed of the system.

My system specs are the following:

Pentium 4 1.6Ghz

Generic 768MB of DDR RAM PC2100

Western Digital 250GB Hard Drive

ATI 9700 Pro 128MB

I'm using a new up to date install of Ubuntu 7.04, I have installed the ATI restricted fglrx driver. My 3D performance works nearly the same as on Windows, Quake3 engine based games run at over 100FPS with everything on except AA and VSync. I have no issues as far as 3D.

My boot speed is also very fast and nearly identical to my Windows XP partition, around 30 seconds.

Currently I have a vanilla setup of Ubuntu/GNOME with NO compiz/beryl or any other special effects. I have the same problems under XFCE & KDE

My problems:

  • Slow rendering of windows and slight artifacts left after minimizing for approximately 0.5 seconds, for example favicon in Firefox.
  • Resizing, minimizing is a few seconds slower compared to my Windows setup.
  • Having multiple windows open overlaying each other greatly decreases the overall responsiveness of resizing, moving and minimizing windows.
  • Sluggish Firefox performance compared to Windows XP, especially in regards to scrolling.
  • Slight delay and drawing of menu and desktop icons, approximately half a second of delay.
  • High CPU usage when scrolling, minimizing, resizing and moving windows. Approximately 50-70% CPU usage.

My RAM usage on Ubuntu is very low compared to Windows XP, Ubuntu uses about 140-160MB of RAM while Windows XP uses around 170-200MB.

I tried downgrading libxll to 6_1.0.3 and forcing version, as suggested here. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x...bug/88815"" target="_blank">Sluggish rendering since xorg 7.2 update

I didn't notice any real improvement.

I have tried most of the links crimesaucer has provided me in my other threads (Thanks BTW), but I only noticed slight application startup increases and not general rendering issues that I have.

I used a lot of tips from this sidux list I found. I checked most of the tips out on Google and they seemed to be used in many different guides for speeding up your system: http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

I only used the tips that I felt comfortable with on my laptop.

However, I didn't agree with all of the Firefox about:config tips, I prefer to follow this guide: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=53650

....using the 2.0.0.5 settings from this page: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Tweaking_preferences

and also these pages:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Preferences

http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=...+at+punctuation

http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries

I found this off of digg.com: http://tvease.net/wiki/index.php?title=Twe...buntu_for_speed

and: http://www.santa-li.com/linuxonbb.html

...they basically say the same things.

This also helped a little: http://www.opendns.com/start/unix.php

and Swiftweasel: http://swiftweasel.sourceforge.net/

....also, for both of my posts, they have a setting for "vm.swappiness=0" which I didn't do because I only have 512MB ram and I figured I wouldn't mess with my swap file, because sometimes I need it.

That was a very good link, the problem is, that a few (almost half) of those are very old (for Dapper)...but there is a lot of real good info in most of those links, just make sure it's current.

What's good about a lot of those links, plus the links that I posted, is that they have the same tweaks for basically all of the settings like Broadband Internet, Swapping, and Concurrent Booting, so at least you know the info is correct, and you have more then one source of info to feel safe about these system tweaks.

Since I originally used this guide a while back (as well as a couple others that were on your page because all of them had the same info): http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

And then added these ones from your page today: http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/loc...aster-browsing/

another about Local DNS: http://www.debianadmin.com/local-dns-cache...ntu-system.html

...and this one for noatime,data=writeback and: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Improve-Per...dgy-47261.shtml

...and I finally tried prelinking, and I can say that my computer feels even faster now...and it was already fast.

I also tried various kernels and even built my own with no changes in speed what so ever. IceWeasle, Firefox and SwiftFox all work at the same speed.

==========================

HAS ANYONE ELSE EXPERIENCED SUCH PROBLEMS and IF SO, CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME!!! Sorry about the CAPS I'm just really frustrated with my poor Ubuntu performance.

The default "ATI" video driver gives me the same performance on Ubuntu except I also have poor 3D performance.

What else can I try, I think what's happening is that my video card is not rendering my desktop but my CPU is and therefore I get slowdowns and spikes. Thanks.

Hi. I have similar experience when I was using GNOME in the past. I have an old desktop PC (Pentium 2.4GHz, 512 MB RAM, 40GB HDD, ATI Radeon VE w/ X.Org built-in driver, 2 CD-RW drive).

The response of Firefox (Icewesel) was a bit slow when I was using GNOME (and KDE, as far as I can remember). Later I changed to Xfce (I install Debian base system and then Xfce), everything become very smooth.

Try to install the ATI driver for Linux from AMD (I never tried it before), I don't know if it helps, but just a chance to improve the 3D performance.

Here are 2 videos comparing the speed of my Windows XP tweaked setup and Ubuntu 7.04 which is also very tweaked. The software used to record both uses quite a bit of CPU so this is not a 100% accurate representation of speed and responsiveness. However it's a decent idea or maybe even benchmark/indication of the problem. Also keep in mind Ubuntu doesn't have the resizing artifacts you see this is due to gtk-recordMyDesktop not recording it correctly. Both desktops are about 20-30% faster with out the recording software, but still Ubuntu is significantly slower then Windows XP!!!

Ubuntu 7.04 (Slow, sluggish and not very responsive) - http://www.mediafire.com/?agyc15ebtug (Download 7MB)

VS

Windows XP Pro (Very responsive and fast) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPhbHp7WhGg

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz). As Linux development continued over the years, it seemed that KDE was getting a bit slower. I switched to fluxbox as a window manager, and have extended the life of my computer - in terms of what I consider acceptable run speeds. I seriously doubt that I could put Vista on here and have decent performance. Remeber, Linux of today has had features added over all the years since XP, so it is going to be tough to declare what versions are 'equivalent' of each other.

I use Linux with fluxbox, because it is current (I get all the latest updates) and it runs quickly (due to using flux as a WM over KDE/Gnome/XFCE).

The distro isn't going to make the biggest difference. In fact, I believe Fedora defaults to running sendmail as a background service (which I have always despised as a default install option - stupid idea, IMO).

ATI doesn't exactly earn an A+ for Linux compatibility. Maybe it's the case that the drivers work on Linux, but aren't optimized at all. That being said, yeah, Ubuntu and such variants aren't so nice on system resources. All I can suggest is trying out different distributions to see which ones work best.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).

Another tip, which will probably give you a slight performance increase (though probably not nearly as much as doubling your ram or switching to a lightweight wm) would be to use a more slimmed down and optimized distro. My favourite distribution, Arch, comes to mind, but Gentoo and Slackware are suitable alternatives. If you'd like something more on the easy-to-use side: Vector is based on Slackware and so has all the speed and advantages but rolled into an easy to use package.

Good luck :)

I am running Linux on my main box now

Intel C2D E6300 @ 1.8ghz

1 GB Ram

Nvidia 7300GS @ 128mb

Linux flies on my system and is so damn! fast. I am running Gnome with beryl and its quite lag free. When I was running Vista, my system was really slow.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

It's definitely video driver issue. I've installed Kubuntu on my 1.6ghz laptop with s3 graphics card (the biggest sh*t of all VGA cards) and I've stunned with the speed (I've had Xfce before, and it worked less responsive)

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz)........................................

Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).
I wouldn't be so sure. I went from 1 to 2gigs and noticed barely any difference and I'm using Fluxbox too!
Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

So it is! It was auto-set by my BIOS that way. I set it to 133/33 which set the CPU to 1600MHz, and the darn thing won't boot. The display is corrupted and it can't properly POST and boot. This CPU had an issue early in life where the fan (a stupid 2-wire fan with no RPM feedback signal) stopped and the CPU shut down due to overheating. It could be that something is damaged/marginal now.

Back to 1200MHz with FSB at 100 for me, I guess. But thanks for pointing that out. And I was looking forward to 33% greater processing power... :(

Get a better CPU. Not one that old. I'm using Ubuntu with a P4 3.4 GHz CPU, 1 gig of DDR2 PC3200 RAM, and an ATI Sapphire x1650 Pro 256Meg AGP vid card (1280X1024) and it runs quite well. These parts aren't as expensive as they were. Better than Vista and I had a good score under it as well.

If you want to play games just dual boot XP for them. I now use a nLited copy of XP just for games and use Ubuntu as my primary OS. This XP just has enough left in it to play games and access the net for online games. I had at first used Transgaming under Ubuntu to play games and they plaed more than fast enough, but I got tired of configuring them for it and not all of my games worked yet under it.

BTW, what version of Wine are you using. 0.44 has some big improvements with regard to DirectX and the like.

Just to verify. You are using the accelerated video driver from the Restricted Drivers Manager in the Administrator menu?

Edited by Foub
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
    • Putin was behind Farage/Brexit and behind Trump/MAGA. Different idiot lying beasts, same fascist master. Same screwed up results for both nations.
    • For me the Final Fantasy games, Langrisser I & II, Hardspace: Shipbreaker, Horizon Forbidden West Complete Edition, Metaphor: ReFantazio and LUNAR Remastered Collection
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      465
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      217
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!