Improving the speed and responsiveness of Ubuntu/GNOME.


Recommended Posts

I'm not satisfied with my Ubuntu performance, even with a tweaked system and using a light Desktop Environment like Xubuntu I notice little to no improvement in responsiveness of the interface and the general speed of the system.

My system specs are the following:

Pentium 4 1.6Ghz

Generic 768MB of DDR RAM PC2100

Western Digital 250GB Hard Drive

ATI 9700 Pro 128MB

I'm using a new up to date install of Ubuntu 7.04, I have installed the ATI restricted fglrx driver. My 3D performance works nearly the same as on Windows, Quake3 engine based games run at over 100FPS with everything on except AA and VSync. I have no issues as far as 3D.

My boot speed is also very fast and nearly identical to my Windows XP partition, around 30 seconds.

Currently I have a vanilla setup of Ubuntu/GNOME with NO compiz/beryl or any other special effects. I have the same problems under XFCE & KDE

My problems:

  • Slow rendering of windows and slight artifacts left after minimizing for approximately 0.5 seconds, for example favicon in Firefox.
  • Resizing, minimizing is a few seconds slower compared to my Windows setup.
  • Having multiple windows open overlaying each other greatly decreases the overall responsiveness of resizing, moving and minimizing windows.
  • Sluggish Firefox performance compared to Windows XP, especially in regards to scrolling.
  • Slight delay and drawing of menu and desktop icons, approximately half a second of delay.
  • High CPU usage when scrolling, minimizing, resizing and moving windows. Approximately 50-70% CPU usage.

My RAM usage on Ubuntu is very low compared to Windows XP, Ubuntu uses about 140-160MB of RAM while Windows XP uses around 170-200MB.

I tried downgrading libxll to 6_1.0.3 and forcing version, as suggested here. - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x...bug/88815"" target="_blank">Sluggish rendering since xorg 7.2 update

I didn't notice any real improvement.

I have tried most of the links crimesaucer has provided me in my other threads (Thanks BTW), but I only noticed slight application startup increases and not general rendering issues that I have.

I used a lot of tips from this sidux list I found. I checked most of the tips out on Google and they seemed to be used in many different guides for speeding up your system: http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

I only used the tips that I felt comfortable with on my laptop.

However, I didn't agree with all of the Firefox about:config tips, I prefer to follow this guide: http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=53650

....using the 2.0.0.5 settings from this page: http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Tweaking_preferences

and also these pages:

http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Preferences

http://kb.mozillazine.org/index.php?title=...+at+punctuation

http://kb.mozillazine.org/About:config_entries

I found this off of digg.com: http://tvease.net/wiki/index.php?title=Twe...buntu_for_speed

and: http://www.santa-li.com/linuxonbb.html

...they basically say the same things.

This also helped a little: http://www.opendns.com/start/unix.php

and Swiftweasel: http://swiftweasel.sourceforge.net/

....also, for both of my posts, they have a setting for "vm.swappiness=0" which I didn't do because I only have 512MB ram and I figured I wouldn't mess with my swap file, because sometimes I need it.

That was a very good link, the problem is, that a few (almost half) of those are very old (for Dapper)...but there is a lot of real good info in most of those links, just make sure it's current.

What's good about a lot of those links, plus the links that I posted, is that they have the same tweaks for basically all of the settings like Broadband Internet, Swapping, and Concurrent Booting, so at least you know the info is correct, and you have more then one source of info to feel safe about these system tweaks.

Since I originally used this guide a while back (as well as a couple others that were on your page because all of them had the same info): http://sidux.com/PNphpBB2-viewtopic-t-3484-start-0.html

And then added these ones from your page today: http://ubuntu.wordpress.com/2006/08/02/loc...aster-browsing/

another about Local DNS: http://www.debianadmin.com/local-dns-cache...ntu-system.html

...and this one for noatime,data=writeback and: http://news.softpedia.com/news/Improve-Per...dgy-47261.shtml

...and I finally tried prelinking, and I can say that my computer feels even faster now...and it was already fast.

I also tried various kernels and even built my own with no changes in speed what so ever. IceWeasle, Firefox and SwiftFox all work at the same speed.

==========================

HAS ANYONE ELSE EXPERIENCED SUCH PROBLEMS and IF SO, CAN YOU PLEASE PLEASE HELP ME!!! Sorry about the CAPS I'm just really frustrated with my poor Ubuntu performance.

The default "ATI" video driver gives me the same performance on Ubuntu except I also have poor 3D performance.

What else can I try, I think what's happening is that my video card is not rendering my desktop but my CPU is and therefore I get slowdowns and spikes. Thanks.

Hi. I have similar experience when I was using GNOME in the past. I have an old desktop PC (Pentium 2.4GHz, 512 MB RAM, 40GB HDD, ATI Radeon VE w/ X.Org built-in driver, 2 CD-RW drive).

The response of Firefox (Icewesel) was a bit slow when I was using GNOME (and KDE, as far as I can remember). Later I changed to Xfce (I install Debian base system and then Xfce), everything become very smooth.

Try to install the ATI driver for Linux from AMD (I never tried it before), I don't know if it helps, but just a chance to improve the 3D performance.

Here are 2 videos comparing the speed of my Windows XP tweaked setup and Ubuntu 7.04 which is also very tweaked. The software used to record both uses quite a bit of CPU so this is not a 100% accurate representation of speed and responsiveness. However it's a decent idea or maybe even benchmark/indication of the problem. Also keep in mind Ubuntu doesn't have the resizing artifacts you see this is due to gtk-recordMyDesktop not recording it correctly. Both desktops are about 20-30% faster with out the recording software, but still Ubuntu is significantly slower then Windows XP!!!

Ubuntu 7.04 (Slow, sluggish and not very responsive) - http://www.mediafire.com/?agyc15ebtug (Download 7MB)

VS

Windows XP Pro (Very responsive and fast) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qPhbHp7WhGg

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz). As Linux development continued over the years, it seemed that KDE was getting a bit slower. I switched to fluxbox as a window manager, and have extended the life of my computer - in terms of what I consider acceptable run speeds. I seriously doubt that I could put Vista on here and have decent performance. Remeber, Linux of today has had features added over all the years since XP, so it is going to be tough to declare what versions are 'equivalent' of each other.

I use Linux with fluxbox, because it is current (I get all the latest updates) and it runs quickly (due to using flux as a WM over KDE/Gnome/XFCE).

The distro isn't going to make the biggest difference. In fact, I believe Fedora defaults to running sendmail as a background service (which I have always despised as a default install option - stupid idea, IMO).

ATI doesn't exactly earn an A+ for Linux compatibility. Maybe it's the case that the drivers work on Linux, but aren't optimized at all. That being said, yeah, Ubuntu and such variants aren't so nice on system resources. All I can suggest is trying out different distributions to see which ones work best.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).

Another tip, which will probably give you a slight performance increase (though probably not nearly as much as doubling your ram or switching to a lightweight wm) would be to use a more slimmed down and optimized distro. My favourite distribution, Arch, comes to mind, but Gentoo and Slackware are suitable alternatives. If you'd like something more on the easy-to-use side: Vector is based on Slackware and so has all the speed and advantages but rolled into an easy to use package.

Good luck :)

I am running Linux on my main box now

Intel C2D E6300 @ 1.8ghz

1 GB Ram

Nvidia 7300GS @ 128mb

Linux flies on my system and is so damn! fast. I am running Gnome with beryl and its quite lag free. When I was running Vista, my system was really slow.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

If I had a dollar to bet I'd say it is avideo driver issue. I have an old laptop with an integrated Intel 32 MB video card and don't have the issues you report. I have always heard better performance with nVidia chipsets than ATI, but I am not 100% sure that is completely true.

It's definitely video driver issue. I've installed Kubuntu on my 1.6ghz laptop with s3 graphics card (the biggest sh*t of all VGA cards) and I've stunned with the speed (I've had Xfce before, and it worked less responsive)

I run Fedora on an old system, as well. It is an Athlon XP1900+ (runs at 1200MHz)........................................

Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

Best advice I can give you is to bump that RAM to a gig or a gig.five. You'll see some big improvements. Also you could do as mark said and use a lighter window manager (I like openbox and pekwm for example) or do both (ram and wm).
I wouldn't be so sure. I went from 1 to 2gigs and noticed barely any difference and I'm using Fluxbox too!
Hate to bump this thread but I have a 1900+ as a server and the CPU is 1600Mhz, you must have your FSB mis-configured to 100 instead of 133.

So it is! It was auto-set by my BIOS that way. I set it to 133/33 which set the CPU to 1600MHz, and the darn thing won't boot. The display is corrupted and it can't properly POST and boot. This CPU had an issue early in life where the fan (a stupid 2-wire fan with no RPM feedback signal) stopped and the CPU shut down due to overheating. It could be that something is damaged/marginal now.

Back to 1200MHz with FSB at 100 for me, I guess. But thanks for pointing that out. And I was looking forward to 33% greater processing power... :(

Get a better CPU. Not one that old. I'm using Ubuntu with a P4 3.4 GHz CPU, 1 gig of DDR2 PC3200 RAM, and an ATI Sapphire x1650 Pro 256Meg AGP vid card (1280X1024) and it runs quite well. These parts aren't as expensive as they were. Better than Vista and I had a good score under it as well.

If you want to play games just dual boot XP for them. I now use a nLited copy of XP just for games and use Ubuntu as my primary OS. This XP just has enough left in it to play games and access the net for online games. I had at first used Transgaming under Ubuntu to play games and they plaed more than fast enough, but I got tired of configuring them for it and not all of my games worked yet under it.

BTW, what version of Wine are you using. 0.44 has some big improvements with regard to DirectX and the like.

Just to verify. You are using the accelerated video driver from the Restricted Drivers Manager in the Administrator menu?

Edited by Foub
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Russia was able to invade Crimea because of those people. But my point is that I've personally heard how great it was to be "back in Russia" right afterwards - look how great it is now. I've asked you a question in another comment which you haven't answered, so I'll ask it again: is it better now without "Europrats"?
    • ZimaBoard 2 1664 Starter Kit review: it's a cool and affordable DIY NAS by Steven Parker IceWhale Technology reached out to me asking if I was interested in testing the ZimaBoard 2, and after convincing them to send me the Starter Kit, it arrived at my doorstep in May. A bit of background: it is a Shanghai-based Chinese company founded in 2020, which specializes in single-board servers and personal cloud solutions. From searching around online, user feedback on the company and ZimaOS is mostly positive, so we're off to a good start. In addition, I should probably point out that although they do not have a large portfolio of NAS devices, with just four of what they do offer, they seem to have covered everything from a relatively low-priced entry point with the ZimaBoard 2, right up to the high end, with the ZimaCube 2 Creator Pack that even includes an NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000. Anyway, as already mentioned, what we have today is the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit, and here are the full specifications: ZimaBoard 2 Model 832, 1664 CPU Intel Core N150 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.6 GHz) TDP: 6W (Base) 10W (Max) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.00 GHz) Memory 8 GB, 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (soldered) Disk Capacity 60 TB (30 TB x 2) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Storage 2 x SATA 3.0 6Gb/s Ports with Power Bootloader 32 GB, 64 GB eMMC Network 2x RJ-45 2.5 GbE PCIe 1 x PCIe 3.0 (via LPC) USB Ports 2 x USB-A 3.1 (5 Gbps) Display Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 (4K@60Hz) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Virtualization Intel® AES New Instructions Intel® Virtualization Technology (VT-x) Intel® Virtualization Technology for Directed I/O (VT-d) Size (H/W/D) 140mm x 83mm x 31mm Weight 0.4 kg (only ZimaBoard 2 device) Power 12v 5A Power Supply Warranty 1 year (Global) 2 Years (EU) OS ZimaOS v1.6.1 MSRP $339, $399 ($548.60) As you can see above, there are two variants of the ZimaBoard 2. The lesser variant has half the eMMC storage and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $60 less than the top variant we are testing today. The above pricing is only for the ZimaBoard 2. I put the MSRP of the Starter Kit next to it in brackets, although as of publishing, it is discounted to $534.50. The ZimaBoard 2 started life on Kickstarter and shipped to backers in August last year. It became available via the official website in late 2025 and Q1 2026. This hobbyist NAS contains the still relatively new N150 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, although in this case, the memory is integrated into the board itself, so it will not be possible to upgrade or expand the amount. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Twin Lake series that sits near the bottom of the N-series, designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops, and as such has a base level TDP of just 6W. As I have noted before, we are seeing another NAS with a great amount of RAM. It's important to mention that the ZimaBoard 2's memory is integrated into the base board (which is why they have two variants of it). As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. First impressions The Starter Kit came in one outer box with several packages inside it (shown above). I forgot to take pics of it because when it arrived, it wasn't clear what was inside, and I had to confirm with my contact that I received the entire Starter Kit. In the box ZimaBoard 2 ZimaBoard 2 HDD Expansion Bracket + PCIe card frame Zimaboard Mini DisplayPort Male to HDMI Female Cable 4K 60Hz Zimaboard PCIe 3.0 x4 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Adapter Card Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws Design Where to start? You'd be forgiven for mistaking it as an SSD enclosure if not for all the ports on it. It is completely made out of metal, and the top is an entire heatsink. It has a premium feel about it, but it definitely looks like a hobby device. As you will see, the completed build looks like it belongs in a server or meter closet rather than as a showpiece on someone's desk. On what I am calling the rear, there's a Mini DisplayPort (1.4), two 2.5 GbE ports, with Type A 3.1 USB ports, and then the barrel connector port. Around the front, there are two SATA6 ports with a power connector in the middle. Left side Right side One side is completely free of ports. On the other there's a slit that allows for the feed of a CPU fan cable, and a PCIe 3.0 X4 slot. Top Bottom The top is entirely made up of a heatsink except for the extended height for the I/O on the rear. Around the other side, you can find the ZIMA branding and some regulatory information stamped near the bottom. As you may see from the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, it scratches quite easily from just moving it around on my Ikea island. Teardown Before we get started, let's have a look at this thing on the inside. The steps to get to the board are as follows: Remove the four smaller Torx screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2; Remove the four larger Torx screws on the sides of the device; Carefully unstick the CMOS battery from the PCB; Remove two Phillips screws on the PCB; Lift out the PCB. Yes, as you can tell from the instructions, you need three different tools to remove Torx and Phillips screws (10 in total), and unhelpfully, one of the screws is located under the CMOS battery, which is stuck onto the PCB. Building Now comes the fun part. Because the ZimaSpace website does not provide any guidance on how to put the Starter Kit together. They only have guidance for connecting the CPU fan. However, they did upload a video to their YouTube channel that shows the entire process. To install the fan, first remove the four screws on the bottom of the ZimaBoard 2, then on the inside, there is a CPU FAN connector where you can attach the fan, reattach the ZimaBoard 2 frame, and feed the fan cable through the provided slit. Then remove the nearest screw on the side and attach the fan frame to the side of the device using the same screw. ZimaBard 2 screws Aligning the screws Bottom view Remember those four screws we removed to access the CPU FAN? Longer screws are provided in the box with the HDD Expansion Bracket, which is what you will now need to attach the ZimaBoard 2 to it. Helpfully, the orientation on how to attach it is made obvious when the frame can only be screwed on at the same overall length as the ZimaBoard 2. If you do it the wrong way around (which is what I did initially) one side hangs off the frame, and it becomes difficult to attach the PCIe Adapter Card cable. PCIe card frame Other side PCIe slot connector Next, it's time to attach the PCIe card frame, which is fastened with the help of 3.5-inch SATA HDD (3 screws). These are toolless screws that you can just use your fingers to fasten them with. Then it is time to connect the provided PCIe cable with the slot connector on one side of the ZimaBoard 2, feed it through the bottom of the HDD frame, and fasten it with two standoffs. Both bracket options 2280 standoffs with 2x 4TB MP44Q The PCIe 3.0 X4 card comes with a short bracket option, handy if you decide to place it inside a different NAS or rack server, but here we need the long bracket. Oddly enough, the M.2 standoffs were preinstalled into the 22110 position, but extra standoffs are included in the box, which I installed at the 2280 position for our use. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $478.99 (the lowest price for 3 months) that TEAMGROUP supplied us with Then we have the almost completed build, you just need to push the card into the PCIe slot. Unfortunately, IceWhale Technologies did not provide a screw for the PCIe card frame (this is also apparent in their own video). Here it is at several different angles, with the last pic showing the SATA Y-Cable connected to the two WD Red Plus 4TB drives. Setup and Usage Next, you connect your cables to the I/O, and the ZimaBoard 2 powers on automatically, as there is no power button on the device. Power is controlled through the Settings in ZimaOS. BIOS The ZimaBoard 2 includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2, 3], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to a SATA/USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the ZimaBoard 2 can be reached by navigating to the IP address (shown if you have a monitor connected), or you can find it using the ZIMA Client desktop application, which is essentially a Zima device finder. Initializing the ZimaBoard 2 The ZimaOS setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full above, it basically consists of setting up an account and some handy tips, and that's that! Post Setup (ZimaOS update) Upon first boot, you are alerted that there is a ZimaOS update from 1.5.0 to 1.6.1, which I applied; the full process is shown above with the changelog. ZimaBoard 2 Storage Setup Next, it is time to set up the storage. ZimaOS actually throws everything onto the eMMC flash drive; it is also the default location of AppData, which is definitely something to be wary about, as the 45GB available storage could fill up quickly. HDDs I first attempted to create a Storage Pool using the two 4TB WD Red Plus NAS drives, and got an error message: After several attempts and then looking online, I discovered it was a bug with ZimaOS where the fix was simply to reboot ZimaOS and then try again, this time I was able to create a RAID mirror using the two drives. SSDs I did the same for the SSDs, as you will see in the above gallery, when I created the second Storage Pool, it only allowed me to select available drives. ZimaBoard 2 AppData ZimaOS comes with an App Store that includes a repository of almost 400 apps, so you will be able to find most of what you'll need for a NAS (although after a quick search, I wasn't able to find a Surveillance Manager), and now comes the important part: moving the default AppData location off the 45GB eMMC and onto a larger volume: Open Settings Then Apps Then, in the Select a new location field, click on the new Storage volume you want to move it to (in my case, the Apps Storage Pool), which is the SSD RAID mirror. Confirm the Migration warning Be praised! You can also do this for Docker (which by default installs onto the 45GB eMMC flash drive) and the User database. Plex Setup Next, I tested the configuration by installing the Plex Server app from the App Store. The library folders must already exist (which I placed into the Storage Pool). Plex Server setup is straightforward and requires very little configuration. In my case, all I had to do was add the media path I just created, which you can also browse to using the folder icon in the path field. In addition, you can now map the new Media library in Windows Explorer using the Zima Client. Oddly enough, it is not possible to access the ZimaBoard 2 over the Network Neighborhood; you must map drives using the client, which is shown in the last image in the above gallery. I watched one of my Blu-Ray rips, which is Dolby Vision with Dolby Atmos, and the content played fine with no stuttering or buffering, which is what anyone needs in this scenario. ZimaBoard 2 Zima Client mobile app There's also a client for mobile. It is pretty barebones, as shown in the above gallery, for example, the Apps screen launches the WebUI for that app, and the Backup must be done manually. On opening Backup, you can select internal storage folders on your phone to backup to the ZimaBoard 2's storage, and although this is constantly scanned, the backup action itself must be manually triggered. There is an option to allow foreground backup (last image in the above gallery), but this basically means the queued backup gets triggered when you manually open the app. Benchmarking SATA PCIe 3.0 X4 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 2.5 GbE was well within acceptable ranges. Writes were generally better on the SSD RAID mirror. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 2.5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 2.5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. Thermals Top PCIe card SATA HDDs Next, I measured some hotspots while playing content on Plex. It's fair to say this will perform better than a NAS that is enclosed in a metal or plastic case, as almost everything storage-wise is exposed! Anyway, the ZimaBoard 2 did not break a sweat with Plex streaming or disk benchmarks. ZimaOS Factory Reset ZimaOS does not include a factory reset option. Instead, you have to download the ZimaOS image and flash it to the eMMC manually. The flashing process is shown in the above gallery. The steps to do so are listed below: Download the ZimaOS image here; Open BalenaEtcher (Run as Administrator) and select the image; Select your inserted USB drive (min 8 GB) Flash to it; Connect your USB drive, monitor, keyboard, USB hub (optional), mouse (optional), and network cable (recommended) to the ZimaBoard 2; Connect power and press F11 continuously; Select your USB drive starting with UEFI in the boot device menu; Press Enter on the Install ZimaOS option; Select /dev/mmcblk0 (MMC) flash drive as target; Confirm with (three times) to wipe the target disk; Wait a couple of minutes while ZimaOS installs; Remove the USB drive and confirm with a reboot; Your ZimaBoard 2 has been factory reset. However, you don't have to stick with ZimaOS, in fact the company also offers official CasaOS images, that are based on Debian; or as they say themselves, put anything you want on this "hackable single board server" it's up to you. Conclusion I had a lot of fun putting this together. I've custom-built all my own PCs and servers since the 90s, and this is the first time I have had to put a NAS together. Even if the actual base ZimaBoard 2 was already a completed build, it still feels pretty custom. I just wish that IceWhale Technology included a getting-started guide in the box for the Start Kit, which would have really completed this kit. Instead, I had to search for the official video on the YouTube channel to make sure I wasn't doing anything wrong. So who is this for? Definitely the hobbyist who is comfortable building their own PC and servers. It also has a much smaller footprint than its nearest equivalent (in terms of specs), like the Beelink Me Pro, which is another NAS I will be testing soon. Although the Beelink does not come with the PCIe 3.0 X4 expansion, the ZimaBoard 2 Starter Kit suddenly looks to be a great bargain, even if it only offers the two 3.5-inch bays over the four in the other example. It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N150 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the ZimaBoard 2 is intended for, media streaming and backup. It also looks like the IceWhale Technology staff are quite active in the official forums helping people with issues they come across with ZimaOS and the devices, peer support seems to be good as well, I was quickly able to find why I was not able to create a new Storage Pool in ZimaOS v1.6.1 even though that is quite a serious bug, hopefully it will be fixed in the next update. If you are comfortable with the command line and Docker, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. This was my first time with ZimaOS. It seems a bit barebones in comparison to the likes of Synology DSM, TOS, and UGOS, but it has a ton of apps to get you started with your home or small business NAS. Where to buy As of publishing, IceWhale Technology is running a discount of up to 5% for the Starter Kit. If you opt to get just the ZimaBoard 2 itself, it does come with a SATA Y-Cable, so you will be able to connect up to two 3.5-inch HDDs to it. ZimaBoard 2 1668 Starter Kit for $534.50 on Amazon US (was $548.60) ZimaBoard 2 832 Starter Kit for $372.88 on Amazon US (was $390.60) Zimaboard 2 1668 (16GB+64GB) for $419.90 on Amazon US Zimaboard 2 832 (8GB+32GB) for $359.90 on Amazon Disclosure: IceWhale Technology provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. Good to know The Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • It's in the Insider's group so yes it's technically beta, though these days it's hard to see much of a difference unless you opt for the most extreme beta builds, which I don't. When I moved here from the Release Preview channel I did so primarily because I wanted to see how well the restored taskbar functionality (restored from Win10, and earlier) is working and whether it was time to finally abandon SAB--and it is--working fine, so far. Not as polished as SAB, but it'll do for me.
    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      222
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!