Is Linux THIS Retarded?


Recommended Posts

Last night I was printing out some envelopes to send my CV off to a dozen or more companies. I was using Windows Vista, Office 2007 and a hp psc 1355 printer/scanner/copier.

After about two successful prints, the third envelope jams in the printer. I cancel the print, and remove the blockage. I go to print again, but Vista has recognised the paper jam, and is now refusing to send any communication to the printer at all. The jam is clear ffs, I FIXED IT!!! Alas, there is NO options to tell Vista that the jam has been cleared. The only solution seems to be......restart my computer? Surely not, this is 2007, and i'm not using Windows 95 ffs!!!

I do some research, and there is indeed NO options to tell Vista that the jam is clear. It won't detect that the printer is in good working order either. At this point I was annoyed, I had lots of windows open, a few tabs in firefox (that's where I was C+P'ing the addresses from) and a few bits and bobs running that I needed. So I had to shut them all down, and restart the computer.

When the computer starts, success, it detects that the printer is normal again! So I reopen the windows and tabs etc... and carry on my printing. 5 envelopes later, the printer jams again. Simple, I clear the blockage and what the hell... Vista recognises the paper jam again, and again refuses to do sweet FA until I restart. AGAIN.

This happened every 5/6 envelope prints for the duration of my printing. I was crawling up the wall with rage. I wanted to take a baseball bat to my printer and computer tower.

So my question is, does this happen in Linux? I've been tinkering with Linux Live CD's for years, and have been actively following it's development over the years too. I think it's time for me to start dual booting and taking it from there (Y)

So, does Linux do this? Or is Linux able to print after you've cleared a paper jam without requiring a restart. I hope it does, because i'm just about ready to torch all things windows, and there MUST be another way to stress free computing. Or at least computing that isn't so retarded :(

Any help, opinions or similar experiences appreciated (Y)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/584528-is-linux-this-retarded/
Share on other sites

I think you'll find that you need to do something on the hardware to clear the jam as being registered.

I don't know how it works with HP inkjets, but we use several of their laser printers in our office. In order to clear the paper jam you either have to:

1) Open and close the top cover

2) Press the "Go" button

3) Press the Online/Offline button.

According to the user manual for the printer you just press the "Resume" button on yours to continue (the power button, just push it once)

i'm pretty sure its your printer that tells vista whether its jammed or not... you are getting mad over something that is beyond microsoft's control.

i was in the same situation a few weeks back... but my hp told me to clear the jam then press the ok button on the printer...

I tried all that, and visited the HP website for troubleshooting information. The printer was fixed and good to go, the printer display registered as much, but once Vista registered a paper jam, it was stuck with it regardless as to whether the printer was fixed or not (N)

So linux will be the same then? Once it registers the printer has a problem, it will refuse to print because of the problem, even when the problem is fixed? :(

I tried all that, and visited the HP website for troubleshooting information. The printer was fixed and good to go, the printer display registered as much, but once Vista registered a paper jam, it was stuck with it regardless as to whether the printer was fixed or not (N)

So linux will be the same then? Once it registers the printer has a problem, it will refuse to print because of the problem, even when the problem is fixed? :(

Unplugging the printer and reconnecting it to a different USB port would probably have solved the problem. I agree that it seems unnecessary, but this does sound more like the hardware is not reporting to Vista correctly, if you put it in a different USB port Vista would detect it as a new device.

+1! you just press the button on the printer, I've got the exact same model and am running with Vista.

And another thing, it should continue printing regardless of what vista says because the document would be stored in the Printers Cache.

Restarting the Spooler service might be faster than rebooting :)

But that's insane, there should be a button or something to fix it.

Hmmm I think back of my beatiful HP scanner, it had this easter egg so that it would play "song of joy" by moving the scanner head. It was the last thing the scanner did :)

I'm not sure, but it sounds like there are suggestions here that this could have been resolved at the printer, using the button.

If you wanted to test this in Linux, I am pretty sure you can boot Knoppix or Ubuntu as a LiveCD and try printing something and "force" a paper jam by holding onto the paper somewhere.

To what everyone said, tried it tried it tried it :D

You name it, it was tried, and Windows just constantly registered a paper jam regardless. Rebooting was me admitting defeat, as that was the only option left :(

What about Linux? Does it behave this way when handling printers?

If your sure you've done everything that you can do then i'd suggest trying to find a diffrent driver for your printer, see if that helps.

As people have said this has nothing to do with Windows, when my canon jams i can either press OK on the printer or click OK in the popup box that tells me theres a jam.

Haven't printed in Linux, that much, but do love the error code which was documented one time which I don't know if it is still there. But it would say the Printer was on Fire.

http://www.eeggs.com/items/1037.html

To those still trying to help with the problem:

Thanks, but I really do know that Vista was the problem. It registered a paper jam, and refused to communicate with the printer until the computer was restarted. The printer was fixed as per HP's instructions, and the printer display registered it as error free. The problem here was the computers refusal to communicate with the printer. It was a windows problem.

What I REALLY want to know, is whether Linux behaves the same way. If I was to dual boot with Ubuntu say, and the printer got jammed, would ubuntu then keep registering the paper jam eternally until restart. Is there even an option in Linux that allows me to "tell it" that the printer is in fact fine and error free, and it can go right ahead and communicate with it fine?

Thanks :)

Thanks, but I really do know that Vista was the problem.

Since it doesn't happen to me, then surely it is a HP driver problem, not a Vista problem?

I suggest trying your printer in Linux if you can, since your experience may differ, unless someone with the same printer as you can comment.

Edited by Daedalus
Thanks, but I really do know that Vista was the problem

Not for me and my HP Photosmart printer.

As for your question, I've never successfully printed anything from within Linux, but last time I tried was years ago.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • If you have a TV in your living room, chances are you can probably just use the Steam Link app and play your huge PC in big picture mode, effectively giving you the Steam Machine experience to see if you'd actually like it. The good news is the Steam Machine can have it's drives upgraded. It has a USB-C 10Gbs port as well, so the 512GB drive could be quickly moved to an external enclosure and repurposed.
    • This machine could very well be a second gaming PC for their living room as a console experience. So we would have to assume their main PC exists as well; With that said, I have 10gb home network with a 2.5gigabit internet connection here so we tend to have more than enough speed to download games. However, we can't make use of the 10gb LAN using Steam's built in transfer tool because it always compresses transfers and that slows the transfer down to well below a standard gigabit port speeds, sometimes as slow as 200-300Mb/s transfers. While that's probably still faster than most internet connections anyway, if they'd fix the LAN transfer issue it'd be upto x5 faster even on a gigabit LAN, than simply dropping a 2.5gbe port on there with hopes of a few people having fast internet connections. There are solutions, work arounds, like using LANCache if you run a NAS... or simply copying the files over manually using a network share.
    • Samsung announces ultra-fast UFS 5.0 storage to supercharge mobile AI by Paul Hill Local AI models tend to run a lot more slowly than cloud services like Claude and Gemini; however, Samsung has just announced that it has developed its UFS 5.0 solution, which increases data transfer to speeds of 10.8GB/s, enabling faster storage and processing in mobile memory that has the potential to provide more optimal local AI experiences. Commenting on this development, Jangseok Choi, head of Memory Product Planning at Samsung Electronics, said: If you’ve tried local AI, you’ll know it can be quite slow, especially if using the larger parameter models. By developing this new solution, Samsung says that storage is evolving from just storing data to a core piece of infrastructure that supports AI computation, too. The Korean company said that UFS 5.0 integrates the latest embedded memory interface standard from JEDEC and achieves up to 10.8 gigabytes per second (GB/s) transfer speeds. Regarding write speeds, Samsung UFS 5.0 can reach 9.5 GB/s. Both the read and write speeds are twice as fast as those of the previous UFS 4.1 standard. Aside from being ideal for local AI, Samsung’s UFS 5.0 is more power efficient by 40% compared to UFS 4.1. Samsung achieved this by implementing innovations such as clock gating and multi-voltage technologies. UFS 5.0 is also ultra-compact at just 7.5mm x 13mm x 0.9mm; that is 16.7% smaller than UFS 4.1. The company said it will be bringing it to multiple devices in the future, including mobile, wearable, and extended reality.
    • A bit like the steamdeck, this probably isn't for you.
    • Gamers Nexus already did their review, and building your own will be faster and cheaper, so not very convincing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      496
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      209
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      99
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      86
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!